2.6.test02 fails to compile...riscom8.o

Ask a Question related to Debian, Design and Development.

  1. #1

    Default 2.6.test02 fails to compile...riscom8.o

    I've installed a debian woody system with a gnome2.2 backport. Basically
    it's a fresh install. I wanted to compile 2.6-test02 and created a
    config from config-2.4.18-686-smp config and enabling the 2.6 features
    by hand.

    When I run make-kpkg kernel-image I fails around riscom8.o. I tried
    several settings and downgraded to gcc-2.95, no help.

    tail from the make output:
    drivers/char/riscom8.c: In function `do_riscom_bh':
    drivers/char/riscom8.c:1662: warning: implicit declaration of function
    `run_task_queue'
    drivers/char/riscom8.c:1662: `tq_riscom' undeclared (first use in this
    function)drivers/char/riscom8.c: In function `rc_init_drivers':
    drivers/char/riscom8.c:1713: warning: implicit declaration of function
    `init_bh'drivers/char/riscom8.c:1713: `RISCOM8_BH' undeclared (first use
    in this function)
    drivers/char/riscom8.c: In function `rc_release_drivers':
    drivers/char/riscom8.c:1756: warning: implicit declaration of function
    `remove_bh'
    drivers/char/riscom8.c:1756: `RISCOM8_BH' undeclared (first use in this
    function)
    drivers/char/riscom8.c:1752: warning: `flags' might be used
    uninitialized in this function
    drivers/char/riscom8.c: At top level:
    drivers/char/riscom8.c:84: warning: `DECLARE_TASK_QUEUE' declared
    `static' but never defined
    make[3]: *** [drivers/char/riscom8.o] Error 1
    make[2]: *** [drivers/char] Error 2
    make[1]: *** [drivers] Error 2
    make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.6.0-test2'
    make: *** [stamp-build] Error 2

    What's wrong???

    Arnaud.



    --
    To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email]debian-user-request@lists.debian.org[/email]
    with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email]listmaster@lists.debian.org[/email]
    A. Loonstra Guest

  2. Similar Questions and Discussions

    1. #40343 [NEW]: compile with --with-tidy fails
      From: php dot user at jeremy dot smallinfinity dot net Operating system: Mac OS X 10.4.8 PHP version: 5.2.0 PHP Bug Type: ...
    2. #26127 [Opn->Bgs]: IMAP compile fails!
      ID: 26127 Updated by: sniper@php.net Reported By: herps at raqtweak dot com -Status: Open +Status: ...
    3. #26127 [NEW]: IMAP compile fails!
      From: herps at raqtweak dot com Operating system: Sun Cobalt RAQ4 PHP version: 4.3.4 PHP Bug Type: IMAP related Bug...
    4. #23330 [Com]: Compile fails
      ID: 23330 Comment by: 98181011 at 263 dot sina dot com Reported By: news105 at guidoni dot com Status: Closed...
    5. [PHP-DEV] Compile fails on OSX 10.3
      Hi! I'm running OSX 10.3 ( Panther ) and the snaps fails to compile. I got the Panther seed at the WWDC earlier this year, and there are=20 newer...
  3. #2

    Default Re: 2.6.test02 fails to compile...riscom8.o

    On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 11:05:47PM +0200, A. Loonstra wrote:
    > I've installed a debian woody system with a gnome2.2 backport. Basically
    > it's a fresh install. I wanted to compile 2.6-test02 and created a
    > config from config-2.4.18-686-smp config and enabling the 2.6 features
    > by hand.
    You probably don't want to do this on woody. At least procps and
    e2fsprogs are too old. Additionally module-init-tools is not available
    (at leaast, not as part of the official distribution).
    >
    > What's wrong???
    >
    It *is* a beta kernel, and a fairly early one, at that. It's quite
    possible that the driver you're trying to compile is buggy.

    Documentation for reporting kernel bugs is available at
    [url]http://www.kernel.org/[/url]

    noah

    --
    __________________________________________________ _____
    | The economy is looking bad, let's start another war.
    | --Dead Kennedys
    | PGP Public Key: [url]http://web.morgul.net/~frodo/mail.html[/url]

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
    Comment: For info see [url]http://www.gnupg.org[/url]

    iD8DBQE/LoWQYrVLjBFATsMRAo0vAJwILcDj05TlxH0i09UhtvFVgbKveg CfQ75c
    pcU90x6EBoDuqZ3uzoG7qnU=
    =QNB9
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    Noah L. Meyerhans Guest

  4. #3

    Default Re: 2.6.test02 fails to compile...riscom8.o

    On Monday 04 August 2003 4:05 pm, A. Loonstra wrote:
    > I've installed a debian woody system with a gnome2.2 backport. Basically
    > it's a fresh install. I wanted to compile 2.6-test02 and created a
    > config from config-2.4.18-686-smp config and enabling the 2.6 features
    > by hand.
    >
    > When I run make-kpkg kernel-image I fails around riscom8.o.
    It fails to compile a lot of modules, If you do not need them just deselect
    them and keep going... then, if you need one of the, bad luck... My
    impression is that most of those modules are old stuff you may not need.

    I compiled this kernel, and works pretty well in my machine, except for some
    bugs with apm/acpi; like they sayd, is a beta version... but let me tell you
    this, it is faster!!!, you can notize the difference playing some games like
    quake2 or the like... not that I play them oftem, what a waste of time!, I
    just do it for benchmarking purposes ;-).


    --
    To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email]debian-user-request@lists.debian.org[/email]
    with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email]listmaster@lists.debian.org[/email]
    Marino Fernandez Guest

  5. #4

    Default Re: 2.6.test02 fails to compile...riscom8.o

    El Mon, 04 Aug 2003 23:05:47 +0200 "A. Loonstra" <arnaud@nospam.sphaero.org> escribió:
    > When I run make-kpkg kernel-image I fails around riscom8.o. I tried
    > several settings and downgraded to gcc-2.95, no help.
    Know bug: [url]http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153[/url]

    The driver hasn't been ported (still) to new interfaces ;(


    --
    To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email]debian-user-request@lists.debian.org[/email]
    with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email]listmaster@lists.debian.org[/email]
    aradorlinux@yahoo.es Guest

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139