Ask a Question related to Ruby, Design and Development.
-
Berger, Daniel #1
64-bit Ruby on Solaris - solved
All,
<snippage>> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng [mailto:hgs@dmu.ac.uk]
Indeed.> gcc-3.3.2 has a number of fixes for the sparc platform
> Hugh
The solution ultimately seems to be: upgrade to gcc 3.3.2, because it
worked after I did that. In addition I set CC to 'gcc -m64
-mcpu=ultrasparc', but left CFLAGS and LDFLAGS unset. Oh, and use Sun's
ld, not GNU's.
Hugh, to answer your earlier question, I had made sure to point to
/usr/ccs first in my path. I was just griping in general about the ld
hell I've entered by building some thing's with binutils, and others
with Sun's utils.
Guy, thank you very much for putting up with me while I stumbled through
this!
Now, to benchmark!
Regards,
Dan
Berger, Daniel Guest
-
Question: C2 Security Configuration for general Unix and Solaris/Trusted Solaris (Auditing)
Erlend Leganger wrote: > Just FYI, I know that within NATO, you can get C2 certification by using an > evaluated verison of Solaris (the latest is... -
64-bit Ruby on Solaris?
Hi all, Solaris 9 gcc 3.3.1 Ruby 1.8.1 p2 Sunblade 100, UltraSparc IIe As usual, I'm playing with things I don't truly understand. Anyway,... -
[ANN] ruby-freedb, ruby-serialport, ruby-mp3info moved to Rubyforge
http://ruby-freedb.rubyforge.org/ http://ruby-serialport.rubyforge.org/ http://ruby-mp3info.rubyforge.org/ bye! --... -
errors compiling Ruby under Solaris
Hi, At Wed, 27 Aug 2003 10:35:57 +0900, Kurt M. Dresner wrote: I have no clue about Solaris system headers, what are there around that line?... -
How to build a distributable Solaris binary for Ruby 1.8?
Hello all: I apologize if I have missed any other posts that addressed this. For our company's internal use I have always used the GCC compiler... -
Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng #2
Re: 64-bit Ruby on Solaris - solved
On Mon, 3 Nov 2003, Berger, Daniel wrote:
I'm fairly sure I didn't mention that! I did ask which version of> Hugh, to answer your earlier question, I had made sure to point to
> /usr/ccs first in my path. I was just griping in general about the ld
binutils and GCC you were trying with when you got the failures.
My experience is that building gnu things with gnu tools generally> hell I've entered by building some thing's with binutils, and others
> with Sun's utils.
works better, but this is not always desirable. And sometimes it
feels endless :-).
[...]Hugh> Regards,
>
> Dan
>
Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng Guest



Reply With Quote

