Are duplicate graphics thrown away?

Ask a Question related to Adobe Acrobat Macintosh, Design and Development.

  1. #1

    Default Are duplicate graphics thrown away?

    Hi,

    I am working on a project that requires the pdf to be 8 MB or smaller for the client and its employees to download from a website and print on their personal printer. I am working in InDesign CS2.

    It contains many screen shots and I made a test document with 45 pages of 2 up screen shots by just using 2 of the same images over and over, the imported screenshots were about 400K each. When I made this test pdf, it was 8MB.

    Now, when I actually put in the screen shots that are to be used in the real job the pdf is about 11MB with all the same settings I had been using, and the screenshots are even smaller in file size (170K). Plus there are maybe only 15 pages of 2 up screenshots.

    This doesnt make sense to me at all. Any insight would be greatly appreciated.
    Christine_Edwards@adobeforums.com Guest

  2. Similar Questions and Discussions

    1. #40024 [NEW]: Able to thrown an Exception in a Destructor
      From: php at girsbrain dot org Operating system: Windows XP SP 2 PHP version: 5.2.0 PHP Bug Type: Class/Object related Bug...
    2. error A License Exception has been thrown
      :D I have been experiencing the same License Exception problem myself, with a new installation of Coldfusion 6.1. Enterprise Edition. As...
    3. A License Exception has been thrown.
      A License Exception has been thrown. You tried to access the developer edition from a disallowed IP (220.89.252.50). The developer edition can only...
    4. I'm getting the following exception thrown
      The underlying connection was closed: The server unexpectedly refused to keep the connection alive. Which is interesting in that this exception...
    5. DOMExceptions not thrown when I expect them to
      When I execute the folowing in PHP5 <?php  $xml = <<<XML <page>  <test>Dit is een test<test> </page> XML;    $dom = new DomDocument();
  3. #2

    Default Re: Are duplicate graphics thrown away?

    Under certain situations, duplicate images are detected and all
    removed except one. This can happen if you do a SAVE AS with fast web
    view selected. It isn't guaranteed to happen.

    I don't know what you mean by "and the screenshots are even smaller in
    file size". The size needed in the PDF has almost no connection to the
    original file size. It depends on the original size in pixels, and
    how well compression works.

    My advice is to
    1. Use only TIFF for screen shots (BMP is ok, but never, never JPEG)
    2. Use settings to create the PDF using only Flate.
    3. Keep the screen shots simple so they can compress well. I recently
    found I could get a screen shot of Acrobat down to about 20% of its
    original size by removing the Acrobat toolbars, for instance. Make
    them as small in pixels as you can while showing the detail you need.
    If you have areas of background make sure they are uniform, etc.

    Aandi Inston
    Aandi_Inston@adobeforums.com Guest

  4. #3

    Default Re: Are duplicate graphics thrown away?

    Christine, there is an odd aspect to Acrobat that many do not realize and catches them off guard (me included when they start to learn the ins and outs of Acrobat.

    As you edit in Acrobat, Acrobat does not remove material until you do a Save As... This means your project will continue to balloon in size after each of your edit sessions, this includes your first export from InDesign. Do a simple test comparison: export your PDF from InDesign, keep that version and then do a Save As... to a different file name, then compare sizes, the Acrobat PDF should be smaller sometimes a lot smaller.

    Your option in Save As... is to save as the the same name with a Replace or a new version of different name, whatever works best for you.

    Also, don't forget the PDF Optimizer for squeezing a bit more juice out of your PDFs.
    Garrett_Cobarr@adobeforums.com Guest

  5. #4

    Default Re: Are duplicate graphics thrown away?

    Aandi, I was very curious about this statement..."My advice is to
    1. Use only TIFF for screen shots (BMP is ok, but never, never JPEG)"

    TIFFs are typically substantially larger than even Maximum setting JPEGs because they contain so much more information. Does Acrobat/PDF handle these differently? Making for a smaller image file somehow?

    This would be a very valuable tip since it is kind of counter intuitive...
    Garrett_Cobarr@adobeforums.com Guest

  6. #5

    Default Re: Are duplicate graphics thrown away?

    Sorry Aandi forgot 2 things: Is your statement only apply to just screen shots? And in Mac OS X screenshots are delivered as PDFs how would you create a TIFF except by a conversion?
    Garrett_Cobarr@adobeforums.com Guest

  7. #6

    Default Re: Are duplicate graphics thrown away?

    >TIFFs are typically substantially larger than even Maximum setting JPEGs because they contain so much more information.
    Actually, they arguably contain exactly the same amount of
    information, in terms of number of pixels.

    There's two parts to this advice

    1. JPEG files are designed for photographs and only photographs (the
    "P" in JPEG). They introduce damage to the original data, in such a
    way that in a photo you don't see it. Screen shots look ugly and
    fuzzy. Also they compress less well if you then use Flate.

    2. The graphic will in any case be decompressed first and then
    recompressed when making the PDF. So the original graphic size is of
    no interest at all.

    Counterintuitive it is.

    Use LZW compression in your TIFF files if you want. It won't damage
    them, and will make them smaller. It won't affect the PDF size.

    Aandi Inston
    Aandi_Inston@adobeforums.com Guest

  8. #7

    Default Re: Are duplicate graphics thrown away?

    >Sorry Aandi forgot 2 things: Is your statement only apply to just screen shots?

    Yes. Very specifically.
    >And in Mac OS X screenshots are delivered as PDFs how would you create a TIFF except by a conversion?
    1. I get them as TIFF (Mac OS X.3).
    2. Using a PDF is OK if it was made without JPEG compression.


    Aandi Inston
    Aandi_Inston@adobeforums.com Guest

  9. #8

    Default Re: Are duplicate graphics thrown away?

    aandi, I am in 10.3.9 using the simple keystroke Command-Shift-3 for my screenshots. Are you using a third party app or have I (quite likely) overlooked a setting for screenshots in the OS itself?

    I just get PDFs.
    Garrett_Cobarr@adobeforums.com Guest

  10. #9

    Default Re: Are duplicate graphics thrown away?

    I haven't heard of Cmd+Shift+3 (though I've read about it now, and I
    vaguely remember using something like that in Mac OS 9). I use the
    Grab utility that comes with Mac OS X. I've tested this and the PDF
    files it makes use ZIP (Flate) compression which is OK.

    In general, though, take care with PDF unless you know the exact kind
    of compression used. TIFF is safe so long as it wasn't JPEG
    compressed.

    One other thing: if you have screen shots as JPEG, you CANNOT UNDO THE
    DAMAGE by saving as TIFF. You have to start again.

    Aandi Inston
    Aandi_Inston@adobeforums.com Guest

  11. #10

    Default Re: Are duplicate graphics thrown away?

    Very informative thread. Aandi, would you mind a paragraph or two on "Flate"? I see the term in the Optimizer options but haven't the slightest what it refers to. (Conjures up notions of passing wind, which I'm sure are not on the mark).

    It is a form of compression?

    Thanks.
    Doug_Katz@adobeforums.com Guest

  12. #11

    Default Re: Are duplicate graphics thrown away?

    Doug,

    See <http://www.prepressure.com/techno/compressionflate.htm>

    Mike
    MikeKazlow@adobeforums.com Guest

  13. #12

    Default Re: Are duplicate graphics thrown away?

    Excellent. Thanks Mike. That site says Acrobat is the only product using Flate/Deflate. Interesting.

    And I AM right that we access this compression option through Optimizer? In other words, Acrobat doesn't "auto-Flate" a PDF, right?
    Doug_Katz@adobeforums.com Guest

  14. #13

    Default Re: Are duplicate graphics thrown away?

    > That site says Acrobat is the only product using Flate/Deflate. Interesting.

    And wrong. Flate is now widely used as a compression format for TIFF
    as well as for PDF.
    >
    >And I AM right that we access this compression option through Optimizer? In other words, Acrobat doesn't "auto-Flate" a PDF, right?
    No, this is the normal compression used. Check your Distiller options,
    which may refer to it as "ZIP".


    Aandi Inston
    Aandi_Inston@adobeforums.com Guest

  15. #14

    Default Re: Are duplicate graphics thrown away?

    OK. Thanks, Aandi. I'm smarter now.
    Doug_Katz@adobeforums.com Guest

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139