Are GUI Tools reliable?

Ask a Question related to IBM DB2, Design and Development.

  1. #1

    Default Are GUI Tools reliable?

    This has been something that has been on my mind for a long time. It
    seems that the GUI tools (Control Center, Command Center, Development
    Center, etc) on Windows are flakey and prone to locking up. This has
    included going to servers that run AIX, Linux, Dynix and Windows. I
    have experienced this since V6 but just shifted over to doing my work
    from command line, instead. I can't even find anybody at IBM that
    actually uses the GUI tools for their normal work environment) I am
    now in and environment where we are shifting from SQL Server (which
    has very good GUI tools) to DB2. My developers are complaining
    bitterly.

    Is my perception in sync with what your experience. If they do work
    reliably for you, did you have to do anything special to get them
    stable? Have you replaced them with 3rd party tools? If so what
    tools did you choose?

    thanks

    Jack
    Jack Guest

  2. Similar Questions and Discussions

    1. CF SCHEDULER NOT RELIABLE
      I am using CFMX 6.1, and have a simple scheduled task that runs every minute. 90% of the time it executes ok, but the other 10% it never executes....
    2. Is <cfdocument> reliable?
      I just upgraded to CF MX 7 and have been testing <cfdocument>. I have a potential new client that I am trying to sell them on CFML specificly for...
    3. Reliable onmouseout in IE
      Been pounding my head a bit over mouse out events in IE. I need a general solution to the following sort of situation. Designer has an element...
    4. Article : Security Tools Part -- 2 (.Net FrameWork Tools Series)
      Hey Group, Yesterday we created our own certificate installed the certificate in the certificate store and even created a key container for the...
    5. is rcp reliable
      dear aix gurus, i'm on the way to copy big amounts of data from an aix 4.3.3 to an 5.2 box with rcp. i use rcp -p -r /source_dir/....
  3. #2

    Default Re: Are GUI Tools reliable?

    > I am
    > now in and environment where we are shifting from SQL Server (which
    > has very good GUI tools) to DB2. My developers are complaining
    > bitterly.
    That's a big step backwards ( talking about the GUI not the database )

    The GUI tools are very bad. I don't understand why IBM is not improving
    them. But there are better products on the market.

    Maybe you should try : [url]http://www.quest.com/[/url]

    --
    =====================

    Grts, Pascal Loonen


    Pascal Loonen Guest

  4. #3

    Default Re: Are GUI Tools reliable?

    I know of the issues on v7. Does anyone have specific complaints on v8?

    Jack wrote:
    > This has been something that has been on my mind for a long time. It
    > seems that the GUI tools (Control Center, Command Center, Development
    > Center, etc) on Windows are flakey and prone to locking up. This has
    > included going to servers that run AIX, Linux, Dynix and Windows. I
    > have experienced this since V6 but just shifted over to doing my work
    > from command line, instead. I can't even find anybody at IBM that
    > actually uses the GUI tools for their normal work environment) I am
    > now in and environment where we are shifting from SQL Server (which
    > has very good GUI tools) to DB2. My developers are complaining
    > bitterly.
    >
    > Is my perception in sync with what your experience. If they do work
    > reliably for you, did you have to do anything special to get them
    > stable? Have you replaced them with 3rd party tools? If so what
    > tools did you choose?
    >
    > thanks
    >
    > Jack
    Blair Adamache Guest

  5. #4

    Default Re: Are GUI Tools reliable?

    I'd be interested in seeing some examples where the syntax generated
    doesn't work when running remotely.
    As for the speed, how much memory do you have on your machine?

    Fred Prose wrote:
    > In an environment where the GUI tool resides on the same box as the
    > instance (ie. a Windows server) the tools are acceptable - but not
    > great. If your connection is client to server, learn the command
    > line. Half the time the Control Center doesn't even generate the
    > correct syntax!
    >
    > I was hoping that went we went from 7.2 to 8.1 (with fix packs) that
    > things would get better. They didn't. And frankly, I don't have the
    > patience to wait on the thing - it's too slow.
    Richard Page Guest

  6. #5

    Default Re: Are GUI Tools reliable?

    [email]jbaker@marketron.com[/email] (Jack) wrote in message news:<13f72d37.0308190527.34cf3cf1@posting.google. com>...
    > This has been something that has been on my mind for a long time. It
    > seems that the GUI tools (Control Center, Command Center, Development
    > Center, etc) on Windows are flakey and prone to locking up. This has
    > included going to servers that run AIX, Linux, Dynix and Windows. I
    > have experienced this since V6 but just shifted over to doing my work
    > from command line, instead. I can't even find anybody at IBM that
    > actually uses the GUI tools for their normal work environment) I am
    > now in and environment where we are shifting from SQL Server (which
    > has very good GUI tools) to DB2. My developers are complaining
    > bitterly.
    >
    > Is my perception in sync with what your experience. If they do work
    > reliably for you, did you have to do anything special to get them
    > stable? Have you replaced them with 3rd party tools? If so what
    > tools did you choose?
    >
    > thanks
    >
    > Jack
    I'm looking for a good GUI as well. Something like phpMyAdmin would be
    great. Basically, I want to manipulate my data without having to learn
    DB2's version of SQL. Point to field, enter data, click - its done.

    The control center only seems to go so far (like making the table, but
    not being able to manipulate the data).

    Anyone?
    Xyerp Guest

  7. #6

    Default Re: Are GUI Tools reliable?


    "Xyerp" <Xyerp@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:3d7bc779.0309150408.7c6ea3f7@posting.google.c om...
    > [email]jbaker@marketron.com[/email] (Jack) wrote in message
    news:<13f72d37.0308190527.34cf3cf1@posting.google. com>...
    > > This has been something that has been on my mind for a long time. It
    > > seems that the GUI tools (Control Center, Command Center, Development
    > > Center, etc) on Windows are flakey and prone to locking up. This has
    > > included going to servers that run AIX, Linux, Dynix and Windows. I
    > > have experienced this since V6 but just shifted over to doing my work
    > > from command line, instead. I can't even find anybody at IBM that
    > > actually uses the GUI tools for their normal work environment) I am
    > > now in and environment where we are shifting from SQL Server (which
    > > has very good GUI tools) to DB2. My developers are complaining
    > > bitterly.
    > >
    > > Is my perception in sync with what your experience. If they do work
    > > reliably for you, did you have to do anything special to get them
    > > stable? Have you replaced them with 3rd party tools? If so what
    > > tools did you choose?
    > >
    > > thanks
    > >
    > > Jack
    >
    > I'm looking for a good GUI as well. Something like phpMyAdmin would be
    > great. Basically, I want to manipulate my data without having to learn
    > DB2's version of SQL. Point to field, enter data, click - its done.
    >
    > The control center only seems to go so far (like making the table, but
    > not being able to manipulate the data).
    >
    > Anyone?
    The IBM GUI is written in Java which seems to be part of the problem (or
    most of the problem). I have seen similar problems with other Java GUI's.
    The GUI does seem to get a little bit better with each release, but is no
    match for a native GUI.

    The decision to use Java probably sounded good to IBM when they decided to
    use it (portability across platforms), but somehow Java just does not seem
    to work well as a GUI.


    Mark A Guest

  8. #7

    Default Re: Are GUI Tools reliable?

    For alternatives I have found Quest Central for DB2 extremely fast, bug free
    and easy on the system memory that the db2 gui tools. The personal edition
    is also free.
    The website is [url]www.quest.com[/url] .
    Viswanath
    "Mark A" <ma@switchboard.net> wrote in message
    news:vak9b.21$5f6.14347@news.uswest.net...
    >
    > "Xyerp" <Xyerp@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    > news:3d7bc779.0309150408.7c6ea3f7@posting.google.c om...
    > > [email]jbaker@marketron.com[/email] (Jack) wrote in message
    > news:<13f72d37.0308190527.34cf3cf1@posting.google. com>...
    > > > This has been something that has been on my mind for a long time. It
    > > > seems that the GUI tools (Control Center, Command Center, Development
    > > > Center, etc) on Windows are flakey and prone to locking up. This has
    > > > included going to servers that run AIX, Linux, Dynix and Windows. I
    > > > have experienced this since V6 but just shifted over to doing my work
    > > > from command line, instead. I can't even find anybody at IBM that
    > > > actually uses the GUI tools for their normal work environment) I am
    > > > now in and environment where we are shifting from SQL Server (which
    > > > has very good GUI tools) to DB2. My developers are complaining
    > > > bitterly.
    > > >
    > > > Is my perception in sync with what your experience. If they do work
    > > > reliably for you, did you have to do anything special to get them
    > > > stable? Have you replaced them with 3rd party tools? If so what
    > > > tools did you choose?
    > > >
    > > > thanks
    > > >
    > > > Jack
    > >
    > > I'm looking for a good GUI as well. Something like phpMyAdmin would be
    > > great. Basically, I want to manipulate my data without having to learn
    > > DB2's version of SQL. Point to field, enter data, click - its done.
    > >
    > > The control center only seems to go so far (like making the table, but
    > > not being able to manipulate the data).
    > >
    > > Anyone?
    >
    > The IBM GUI is written in Java which seems to be part of the problem (or
    > most of the problem). I have seen similar problems with other Java GUI's.
    > The GUI does seem to get a little bit better with each release, but is no
    > match for a native GUI.
    >
    > The decision to use Java probably sounded good to IBM when they decided to
    > use it (portability across platforms), but somehow Java just does not seem
    > to work well as a GUI.
    >
    >

    Viswanath Nandigam Guest

  9. #8

    Default Re: Are GUI Tools reliable?

    "Viswanath Nandigam" <vnandigam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:bk7kre$3l5$1@news1.ucsd.edu...
    > For alternatives I have found Quest Central for DB2 extremely fast, bug
    free
    > and easy on the system memory that the db2 gui tools. The personal edition
    > is also free.
    I think that it has an expiration date on it, so it is not free.


    Mark A Guest

  10. #9

    Default Re: Are GUI Tools reliable?

    "Mark A" <ma@switchboard.net> wrote in message news:<vak9b.21$5f6.14347@news.uswest.net>...
    > "Xyerp" <Xyerp@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    > news:3d7bc779.0309150408.7c6ea3f7@posting.google.c om...
    > > [email]jbaker@marketron.com[/email] (Jack) wrote in message
    > news:<13f72d37.0308190527.34cf3cf1@posting.google. com>...
    > > > This has been something that has been on my mind for a long time. It
    > > > seems that the GUI tools (Control Center, Command Center, Development
    > > > Center, etc) on Windows are flakey and prone to locking up. This has
    > > > included going to servers that run AIX, Linux, Dynix and Windows. I
    > > > have experienced this since V6 but just shifted over to doing my work
    > > > from command line, instead. I can't even find anybody at IBM that
    > > > actually uses the GUI tools for their normal work environment) I am
    > > > now in and environment where we are shifting from SQL Server (which
    > > > has very good GUI tools) to DB2. My developers are complaining
    > > > bitterly.
    > > >
    > > > Is my perception in sync with what your experience. If they do work
    > > > reliably for you, did you have to do anything special to get them
    > > > stable? Have you replaced them with 3rd party tools? If so what
    > > > tools did you choose?
    > > >
    > > > thanks
    > > >
    > > > Jack
    > >
    > > I'm looking for a good GUI as well. Something like phpMyAdmin would be
    > > great. Basically, I want to manipulate my data without having to learn
    > > DB2's version of SQL. Point to field, enter data, click - its done.
    > >
    > > The control center only seems to go so far (like making the table, but
    > > not being able to manipulate the data).
    > >
    > > Anyone?
    >
    > The IBM GUI is written in Java which seems to be part of the problem (or
    > most of the problem). I have seen similar problems with other Java GUI's.
    > The GUI does seem to get a little bit better with each release, but is no
    > match for a native GUI.
    >
    > The decision to use Java probably sounded good to IBM when they decided to
    > use it (portability across platforms), but somehow Java just does not seem
    > to work well as a GUI.
    Maybe IBM should port there java GUI to java with SWT(native windowing
    library for Java available on most platforms) like Eclipse... Once
    Eclipse gets going it is extremly snappy and realiable... Looks great
    too!

    Scott
    spshealy@yahoo.com Guest

  11. #10

    Default Re: Are GUI Tools reliable?

    > Is anyone using candle as monitoring tool for UDB? Any experiences?

    Michaela

    [email]spshealy@yahoo.com[/email] wrote in message news:<4cdf286e.0309170607.3881d099@posting.google. com>...
    > "Mark A" <ma@switchboard.net> wrote in message news:<vak9b.21$5f6.14347@news.uswest.net>...
    > > "Xyerp" <Xyerp@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    > > news:3d7bc779.0309150408.7c6ea3f7@posting.google.c om...
    > > > [email]jbaker@marketron.com[/email] (Jack) wrote in message
    > news:<13f72d37.0308190527.34cf3cf1@posting.google. com>...
    > > > > This has been something that has been on my mind for a long time. It
    > > > > seems that the GUI tools (Control Center, Command Center, Development
    > > > > Center, etc) on Windows are flakey and prone to locking up. This has
    > > > > included going to servers that run AIX, Linux, Dynix and Windows. I
    > > > > have experienced this since V6 but just shifted over to doing my work
    > > > > from command line, instead. I can't even find anybody at IBM that
    > > > > actually uses the GUI tools for their normal work environment) I am
    > > > > now in and environment where we are shifting from SQL Server (which
    > > > > has very good GUI tools) to DB2. My developers are complaining
    > > > > bitterly.
    > > > >
    > > > > Is my perception in sync with what your experience. If they do work
    > > > > reliably for you, did you have to do anything special to get them
    > > > > stable? Have you replaced them with 3rd party tools? If so what
    > > > > tools did you choose?
    > > > >
    > > > > thanks
    > > > >
    > > > > Jack
    > > >
    > > > I'm looking for a good GUI as well. Something like phpMyAdmin would be
    > > > great. Basically, I want to manipulate my data without having to learn
    > > > DB2's version of SQL. Point to field, enter data, click - its done.
    > > >
    > > > The control center only seems to go so far (like making the table, but
    > > > not being able to manipulate the data).
    > > >
    > > > Anyone?
    > >
    > > The IBM GUI is written in Java which seems to be part of the problem (or
    > > most of the problem). I have seen similar problems with other Java GUI's.
    > > The GUI does seem to get a little bit better with each release, but is no
    > > match for a native GUI.
    > >
    > > The decision to use Java probably sounded good to IBM when they decided to
    > > use it (portability across platforms), but somehow Java just does not seem
    > > to work well as a GUI.
    >
    > Maybe IBM should port there java GUI to java with SWT(native windowing
    > library for Java available on most platforms) like Eclipse... Once
    > Eclipse gets going it is extremly snappy and realiable... Looks great
    > too!
    >
    > Scott
    mbmiko Guest

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139