Ask a Question related to Windows Server, Design and Development.
-
Michael Kennedy [UB] #1
Builtin Firewall Blocks Localhost Access (Even Open Ports)
Hi,
I am configuring a Windows 2003 Standard Edition Server and for reasons not
worth going into we have to use some sort of software firewall. Currently
this is a combination of the built-in Windows firewall (from the advance
properties of the network connection) and IPSec to further filter the access
to the open ports in the firewall.
But there is a weird problem. I keep getting messages like this in my
firewall log:
2004-06-29 14:54:47 DROP TCP 127.0.0.1 192.168.0.64 3666 4026 40 R
3232056443 3232056443 0 - - -
2004-06-29 14:54:50 DROP TCP 127.0.0.1 192.168.0.64 3666 4026 40 R
3232056443 3232056443 0 - - -
2004-06-29 14:54:56 DROP TCP 127.0.0.1 192.168.0.64 3666 4026 40 R
3232056443 3232056443 0 - - -
2004-06-29 14:55:02 DROP TCP 127.0.0.1 192.168.0.64 3628 4026 40 R
3216250718 3216250718 0 - - -
where 192.168.0.64 has been substituted for the actual IP of the server.
First of all, why is the firewall blocking access to localhost? Secondly,
even after I have opened those ports in the firewall, they still show up as
blocked in the firewall log for localhost (127.0.0.1).
Please help if you have any ideas or comments.
Also, I am trying to get NetBIOS file sharing to work for this server
configuration. I have opened the ports that I can determine are necessary by
looking at the blocked traffic in the firewall log. And this works OK for a
short time, then the connection to the file shares seem to hang for a long
time (1-5 minutes?) for no apparent reason. Anyone else got this to work?
Thanks in advance,
Michael
Michael Kennedy [UB] Guest
-
Which ports to open?
I have made ports 19998 and 19997 available to the ODBC Server but I still can't create a database in the Administrator. If I turn off TCP/IP port... -
sockstat -4 not showing all open ports for apache2
I just installed apache 2 and was trying to see if port 80 was open by doing a sockstat -4 but I couldn't see the port so I thought it didn't... -
Open Ports on Windows 2003
What are ports 1025,1026,1027,2381,2518,2519,and 2520 used for in Windows 2003? When I do a port scan, these ports are open, but I don't know why... -
Using blocks in C (with File.open)
Hi: I have written some code in Ruby to parse a file and yield items inside the file. It looks something like this: def each(file)_... -
Personal Firewall; What ports should stay open?
I have a McAfree personal firewall and I think that in order to get Windows Updates and stuff of that nature I need to open up a port to allow the... -
S. Pidgorny #2
Re: Builtin Firewall Blocks Localhost Access (Even Open Ports)
Inline:
"Michael Kennedy [UB]" <mkennedy@REMOVETHIS.unitedbinary.com> wrote in
message news:ORkxzTiXEHA.3120@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
not> I am configuring a Windows 2003 Standard Edition Server and for reasonsaccess> worth going into we have to use some sort of software firewall. Currently
> this is a combination of the built-in Windows firewall (from the advance
> properties of the network connection) and IPSec to further filter theUsing both? unnecessary overkill.> to the open ports in the firewall.
> But there is a weird problem. I keep getting messages like this in my
> firewall log:If i get the log format right, the 127.0.0.1 is the source, not destination.> 2004-06-29 14:54:56 DROP TCP 127.0.0.1 192.168.0.64 3666 4026 40 R
> 3232056443 3232056443 0 - - -
> 2004-06-29 14:55:02 DROP TCP 127.0.0.1 192.168.0.64 3628 4026 40 R
> 3216250718 3216250718 0 - - -
>
> where 192.168.0.64 has been substituted for the actual IP of the server.
> First of all, why is the firewall blocking access to localhost?
Whatever the source is, the firewall blocks traffic to the external Ip, as
it should do. The source IP might be spoofed, ot you have a process on your
computer trying to access port 4026 on it - see if there is something
listening on that port.
as> Secondly,
> even after I have opened those ports in the firewall, they still show upMeaning port 4026? Anyway, you should NOT open ports unless you know what> blocked in the firewall log for localhost (127.0.0.1).
kind of traffic is expected to come.
by> Please help if you have any ideas or comments.
>
> Also, I am trying to get NetBIOS file sharing to work for this server
> configuration. I have opened the ports that I can determine are necessarya> looking at the blocked traffic in the firewall log. And this works OK forYes, I did. The delay is because of NetBIOS name resolution, more> short time, then the connection to the file shares seem to hang for a long
> time (1-5 minutes?) for no apparent reason. Anyone else got this to work?
precisely - lack thereof. Use fully-qualified domain name (like
mycomputer.mydomain.net) to map to the resources, make sure DNS is in place.
More importantly, use CIFS direct hosting (port 445) for file sharing - more
secure and faster: you don't have to use NetBIOS nowadays.
--
Svyatoslav Pidgorny, MVP, MCSE
-= F1 is the key =-
S. Pidgorny Guest



Reply With Quote

