Ask a Question related to Coldfusion Database Access, Design and Development.
-
biggreenegg #1
CF5 vs CF6.1 Sybase slow
I am having a performance problem with a query that was written for CF5 and has
been migrated to CF6.1. The database server is Sybase Adaptive Server 12.5.
SELECT
field_1
,field_2
,field_3
,field_4
,field_5
,field_6
,field_7
FROM
Table_1
WHERE
field_1 = 501
CF5 time=0ms
CF6.1 time=219ms
If I drop field_7 from the SELECT
SELECT
field_1
,field_2
,field_3
,field_4
,field_5
,field_6
FROM
Table_1
WHERE
field_1 = 501
CF5 time=0ms
CF6.1 time=0ms
Why?
biggreenegg Guest
-
#36516 [Com]: Sybase library names have changed in Sybase 15.x
ID: 36516 Comment by: jmherod at sbcglobal dot net Reported By: sean at digitalworkshop dot net Status: No... -
SLOW DOWN..Why is my Photoshop CS Super Slow in PANTHER?
G5 DUAL 2GHZ .. 1 GB RAM .. PHOTOSHOP CS .. PANTHER/JAGUAR ........................................................... I've had my DUAL G5 since... -
Q: DBD::Sybase vs Solaris
Hi, this is the old question about how to get DBD::Sybase to function on Solaris 5.8, (and _yes_ I've read the README and searched the web). I've... -
Sybase::DBD
When I run make test while compiling Sybase::DBD I get the following error when the test routing is running a place module: gandalf:# make test... -
AIX 4.3.2 and PTF .... and Sybase 11.5
Hi all. I got all PTF from IBM to upgrade to 4.3.3 and 11th pathch level I would understand if I can have problem with Sybase RDBMS installed... -
NicTunney #2
Re: CF5 vs CF6.1 Sybase slow
Are you caching queries? What datatype is field7?
NicTunney Guest
-
biggreenegg #3
Re: CF5 vs CF6.1 Sybase slow
No caching. Datatype does not seem to be a factor. I have tried numbers and
characters with the same result. I have also put the table in a MS-Access
database and the time for CF5 and CF6.1 are the same. I have applied CF6.1
Updater and updated the macromedia_drivers.jar to 3.4.
I believe the problem lies with the Sybase JDBC classes.
biggreenegg Guest



Reply With Quote

