CF5 vs CF6.1 Sybase slow

Ask a Question related to Coldfusion Database Access, Design and Development.

  1. #1

    Default CF5 vs CF6.1 Sybase slow

    I am having a performance problem with a query that was written for CF5 and has
    been migrated to CF6.1. The database server is Sybase Adaptive Server 12.5.

    SELECT
    field_1
    ,field_2
    ,field_3
    ,field_4
    ,field_5
    ,field_6
    ,field_7
    FROM
    Table_1
    WHERE
    field_1 = 501

    CF5 time=0ms
    CF6.1 time=219ms

    If I drop field_7 from the SELECT

    SELECT
    field_1
    ,field_2
    ,field_3
    ,field_4
    ,field_5
    ,field_6
    FROM
    Table_1
    WHERE
    field_1 = 501

    CF5 time=0ms
    CF6.1 time=0ms

    Why?


    biggreenegg Guest

  2. Similar Questions and Discussions

    1. #36516 [Com]: Sybase library names have changed in Sybase 15.x
      ID: 36516 Comment by: jmherod at sbcglobal dot net Reported By: sean at digitalworkshop dot net Status: No...
    2. SLOW DOWN..Why is my Photoshop CS Super Slow in PANTHER?
      G5 DUAL 2GHZ .. 1 GB RAM .. PHOTOSHOP CS .. PANTHER/JAGUAR ........................................................... I've had my DUAL G5 since...
    3. Q: DBD::Sybase vs Solaris
      Hi, this is the old question about how to get DBD::Sybase to function on Solaris 5.8, (and _yes_ I've read the README and searched the web). I've...
    4. Sybase::DBD
      When I run make test while compiling Sybase::DBD I get the following error when the test routing is running a place module: gandalf:# make test...
    5. AIX 4.3.2 and PTF .... and Sybase 11.5
      Hi all. I got all PTF from IBM to upgrade to 4.3.3 and 11th pathch level I would understand if I can have problem with Sybase RDBMS installed...
  3. #2

    Default Re: CF5 vs CF6.1 Sybase slow

    Are you caching queries? What datatype is field7?
    NicTunney Guest

  4. #3

    Default Re: CF5 vs CF6.1 Sybase slow

    No caching. Datatype does not seem to be a factor. I have tried numbers and
    characters with the same result. I have also put the table in a MS-Access
    database and the time for CF5 and CF6.1 are the same. I have applied CF6.1
    Updater and updated the macromedia_drivers.jar to 3.4.

    I believe the problem lies with the Sybase JDBC classes.

    biggreenegg Guest

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139