Challenge-response mail filters considered harmful (by spammers)

Ask a Question related to Debian, Design and Development.

  1. #1

    Default Re: Challenge-response mail filters considered harmful (by spammers)


    There is SO much misunderstanding (and disinformation) about CR systems here.


    Let's say I was going to mail a business. Here's what would happen:


    The address that I mailed to would go into the temporary part my passlist
    automatically, and any mail from that address for the next 7 days would be
    accepted. Likely, all I would get is an auto-response from that address.


    The sig would look like this:

    --
    Please include this signature in any response to this mail. Thank You.

    03030328485746362539765473632263748596943754959696 9685747


    The first 6 characters are the date, UTC, making it easy to expire the password
    in a week, with a different one going out with each mail.

    Since including the initial mail in the reply is standard practice in the
    business world, and with most individuals for that matter, there is nothing
    remotely unusual or discomfiting about the request.

    I do the same with any individuals I initiate contact with. No one has ever
    said a word about it, except perhaps to ask what it is about.


    The procmail recipe, for my fellow hackers out there, is simplicity itself:


    :0 B:
    * .*030303284857463625397654736322637485969437549596 969685747
    inbox

    This also goes in the temporary section of my passlist.



    To generate the number you can do:

    echo "`date -u +%m%d%y`"$RANDOM""$RANDOM""$RANDOM""$RANDOM""$RAND OM""$RANDOM"\
    "$RANDOM""$RANDOM""$RANDOM""$RANDOM""$RANDOM"" | sed 's/\(^.\{55\}\)\(.*\)/\1\
    /' > file


    (if anyone can clean that up for me, I'd appreciate it.)




    See? Who is inconvenienced? Can a spammer beat that? NO.


    Alan



    --
    For Linux/Bash users: Eliminate spam with the Mailbox-Sentry-Program.
    See: [url]http://tinyurl.com/inpd[/url] for the scripts and docs.



    --
    To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email]debian-user-request@lists.debian.org[/email]
    with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email]listmaster@lists.debian.org[/email]
    Alan Connor Guest

  2. Similar Questions and Discussions

    1. OT NT challenge response
      I am pretty sure I know the answer to this, but I wanted to ask just to make sure. Our server is Windows 2003 IIS6 with CFMX 7.0 All desktops run...
    2. NT Challenge response without popup
      Hi, I have one page visible to the public which is my loginform. The username and password entered here I check against my LDAP server if they...
    3. Suggestions for Filters in Mail ? [OS-X]
      With everyone getting hammered by the current Denial-of-Service virus, I was wondering what people were using to filter out some of the spam they...
    4. Challenge-response mail filters considered harmful
      > From dfokkema@ileos.nl Sun Aug 3 12:04:08 2003 Any decent CR program auto-matically passlists anyone that they send a message to.
    5. Discussion of Challenge/Response
      Because this topic is getting somewhat out of hand, and is being discussed in various threads, I thought I would try and consolidate it, if only to...
  3. #2

    Default Re: Challenge-response mail filters considered harmful (by spammers)


    --
    For Linux/Bash users: Eliminate spam with the Mailbox-Sentry-Program.
    See: [url]http://tinyurl.com/inpd[/url] for the scripts and docs.



    In my last post on this subject, I made a mistake.


    When I send a mail to a business (etc.) the address to which it was sent
    is entered into my passlist, but expires after the receipt of one mail
    from that address, to allow for auto-responses.

    Any further mail from that address would have to have the sig with the
    long string in it, or it would be gzipped up in my quarantine directory
    for 3 days and an auto-response sent out to it. (this has never happened).



    Cheerio,


    Alan


    --
    To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email]debian-user-request@lists.debian.org[/email]
    with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email]listmaster@lists.debian.org[/email]
    Alan Connor Guest

  4. #3

    Default Re: Challenge-response mail filters considered harmful (by spammers)

    Alan Connor <alanconnor@earthlink.net> writes:
    > The sig would look like this:
    >
    > --
    > Please include this signature in any response to this mail. Thank You.
    >
    > 03030328485746362539765473632263748596943754959696 9685747
    That would be a bad implementation. First, that's not a valid
    signature delimiter. Second, if it were, many MUAs strip off
    signatures automatically in quoted replies.

    --
    Alan Shutko <ats@acm.org> - I am the rocks.
    To Split, or not to Split: that is the question.-Amoeba


    --
    To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email]debian-user-request@lists.debian.org[/email]
    with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email]listmaster@lists.debian.org[/email]
    Alan Shutko Guest

  5. #4

    Default Re: Challenge-response mail filters considered harmful (by spammers)

    On Sun, 2003-08-03 at 18:38, Alan Shutko wrote:
    > Alan Connor <alanconnor@earthlink.net> writes:
    >
    > > The sig would look like this:
    > >
    > > --
    > > Please include this signature in any response to this mail. Thank You.
    > >
    > > 03030328485746362539765473632263748596943754959696 9685747
    >
    > That would be a bad implementation. First, that's not a valid
    > signature delimiter. Second, if it were, many MUAs strip off
    > signatures automatically in quoted replies.
    For example: Evolution.

    --
    +-----------------------------------------------------------------+
    | Ron Johnson, Jr. Home: [email]ron.l.johnson@cox.net[/email] |
    | Jefferson, LA USA |
    | |
    | "I'm not a vegetarian because I love animals, I'm a vegetarian |
    | because I hate vegetables!" |
    | unknown |
    +-----------------------------------------------------------------+



    --
    To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email]debian-user-request@lists.debian.org[/email]
    with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email]listmaster@lists.debian.org[/email]
    Ron Johnson Guest

  6. #5

    Default Re: Challenge-response mail filters considered harmful (by spammers)

    On Sun, 03 Aug 2003 18:38:03 -0500
    Alan Shutko <ats@acm.org> wrote:
    > That would be a bad implementation. First, that's not a valid
    > signature delimiter. Second, if it were, many MUAs strip off
    > signatures automatically in quoted replies.
    Not to mention that if the MUA doesn't do it the user should for proper
    nettiquette.

    --
    Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
    PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
    | -- Lenny Nero - Strange Days
    -------------------------------+---------------------------------------------

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

    iD8DBQE/LeLtel/srYtumcURAnHkAJ9OZ3VTUwlagBEz/OkRHLTqR3AioACg4BEI
    RWnnwzy/aakbntg1tZlHPLM=
    =lLNc
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    Steve Lamb Guest

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139