Ask a Question related to Adobe Photoshop Elements, Design and Development.
-
Bob Chapman #1
color depth with Minolta dual scan III
I'm running Elements 2 on an XP PC. I'm scanning negatives with the Minolta Dual Scan III. I use the Dual 3 Utility to perform the scan to disk, with 16 bit color depth. When I open the resulting images in Elements, i get an error message that the image is in an unsupported color depth, would I like to convert it. It then loads the image, but it seems to be converting to 8-bit color depth (at leats that's what the little progress bar at the bottom of the screen indicates).
How do I tell if that is what is really happening? and what do i have to do to be able to load the full color information into Elements?
Thanks for any help you can offer.
Bob Chapman
Bob Chapman Guest
-
Color Depth Mapping Problems
I have a cast of 16 bit images. I want to transform them to 8 bit images and use the "Microsoft RLE" compression to output AVI movies. If I... -
bitmap color depth?
Hi, I've created a Director movie. However, I imported all of the bitmaps at 24 bits color depth instead of 8 bits. Now, the file size of my... -
AppleScript: how to set resolution and color depth?
I'm trying to write little helper scriptlets for some children's games that run at 8-bit 640x480. The script should change the display, launch the... -
Minolta Scan Dual 3 Installation problem! Please HElp me
I just got my Minolta SD3 and I can not get it to work. My computer is 500mhz WIN 98 my USB is 1.1. I keep getting the error "could not confimr... -
I just bought A Minolta Scan Dual 3!
I am waiting for it to be shipped. I will post some pictures as soon as I get working with it. Any thing I should absolutly do when I get it? Such... -
Beth Haney #2
Re: color depth with Minolta dual scan III
Ah, that's the problem with those nice scanners that will give 16 or even 48 bit scans. There's not much in the way of consumer grade digital editing software that will support it. Elements can handle 8 bit only, as far as I know. If I'm wrong, people will be lining up to tell me! Maybe someone will give a suggestion on how to make use of the additional information 16 bit provides.
Beth Haney Guest
-
Mac McDougald #3
Re: color depth with Minolta dual scan III
It's most important that the scan is sampled in 16 bit.
Saving/editing in 16 bit is much less important.
Yes, histograms "prove" that it is better, but eyes "prove" it is minimal
to no difference.
Mac
Mac McDougald Guest
-
Leen Koper #4
Re: color depth with Minolta dual scan III
Maybe a dumb question.
Although, one of my teachers told me there is no such thing as a dumb question, just only dumb answers.
Mac, would you be so kind as to explain why 16 bit sampling is important and saving/editing isn't? Doesnot sound very logical to me. Like buying a car that can drive 200 Mph and never being allowed to drive that fast.
Leen
Leen Koper Guest
-
David L. Harris #5
Re: color depth with Minolta dual scan III
In article <1de9fdf1.2@WebX.la2eafNXanI>, Bob Chapman
<bob_chapm@msn.com> wrote:
That depends on the resolution you save them at. If it is 2840 ppi,> Fortunately, disk is cheap, so saving two copies (8-bit and 16-bit) is not a
> big deal these days, while I wait for improving software!
then the file size can be around 70 MB, and not many of those will fit
on a CD.
David L. Harris Guest



Reply With Quote

