customising external .js files

[mark | r]

can you use asp to customise external js files e.g.

<script src="fred.js"></script>

where fred gets the page id and changes an image in the .js file to suit?

mark

[Tom B]

What I would do, is have a function in fred.js that accepts a parameter

For example in fred.js

function Start(aString)
{
alert(aString);
}

then in your "asp" code...

<%
Dim sString
sString="'Hello'"
%>

<script src="fred.js"></script>
<script language=Javascript>
Start(<%=sString%>)
</script>

which would result in
<script src="fred.js"></script>
<script language=Javascript>
Start('Hello')
</script>


"mark | r" <mark@nmd.freeuk.com> wrote in message
news:3f5e0376$0$261$cc9e4d1f@news.dial.pipex.com.. .

> can you use asp to customise external js files e.g.
>
> <script src="fred.js"></script>
>
> where fred gets the page id and changes an image in the .js file to suit?
>
> mark
>
>

[mark | r]

wjat i mean is can the contents of a .js file be built?

mark

[Ray at]

<script src="fred.ASP">

Use that, and then in fred.asp, response.write your client-side code as
needed.

Ray at work

"mark | r" <mark@nmd.freeuk.com> wrote in message
news:3f5e112e$0$265$cc9e4d1f@news.dial.pipex.com.. .

> wjat i mean is can the contents of a .js file be built?
>
> mark
>
>

[Chris Barber]

I suppose you could ask ... why? If it's dynamic then what's the point of it
being a src="" since there is no point in caching it.

Generalise your scripts enough to be cacheable and then put the dynamic
stuff direct into the html page?

Do you have a specific aim in mind for this since it's not clear what the
context or final intention is?

Chris.


"mark | r" <mark@nmd.freeuk.com> wrote in message
news:3f5e112e$0$265$cc9e4d1f@news.dial.pipex.com.. .
wjat i mean is can the contents of a .js file be built?

mark

[Dave Anderson]

"Chris Barber" wrote:

>
> I suppose you could ask ... why? If it's dynamic then what's
> the point of it being a src="" since there is no point in
> caching it.

One reason comes to mind. I believe it has been explored in
ms.public.scripting.jscript as a means for hiding source code from prying
eyes. I don't recall the consensus on its effectiveness, however.


--
Dave Anderson

Unsolicited commercial email will be read at a cost of $500 per message. Use
of this email address implies consent to these terms. Please do not contact
me directly or ask me to contact you directly for assistance. If your
question is worth asking, it's worth posting.

[mark | r]

its an include to hide a non accessible element from a text browser.

mark

"Dave Anderson" <GTSPXOESSGOQ@spammotel.com> wrote in message
news:OvAp5YwdDHA.2432@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...

> "Chris Barber" wrote:

> >
> > I suppose you could ask ... why? If it's dynamic then what's
> > the point of it being a src="" since there is no point in
> > caching it.

>
> One reason comes to mind. I believe it has been explored in
> ms.public.scripting.jscript as a means for hiding source code from prying
> eyes. I don't recall the consensus on its effectiveness, however.
>
>
> --
> Dave Anderson
>
> Unsolicited commercial email will be read at a cost of $500 per message.

Use

> of this email address implies consent to these terms. Please do not

contact

> me directly or ask me to contact you directly for assistance. If your
> question is worth asking, it's worth posting.
>
>