On 2003-12-31, David Schwartz <com> wrote:
> No, that's not true. I'm suspecting you don't understand how Nagle
Could be. From reading different specs I have the impression that this
algorithm attempts to avoid sending multiple small datagrams by holding
up the first one in hope that there'll be some more data to come. So if
in my program I say 'send(s, buf, 10, 0)' then this data shall be held
up for a short while, just in case if I do another 'send'. Please
correct me if I'm wrong.