Document Imaging and Management

Ask a Question related to Mac Applications & Software, Design and Development.

  1. #1

    Default Document Imaging and Management

    Hi there,

    I've been unsuccessful with my Googling so i'm hoping some of you may be
    able to give me some pointers. I'm looking for document imaging software
    for MacOS X. Previously I used Microsoft Office XP Document Imaging so
    i'm looking for something like that or Scansoft's PaperPort application.

    Any suggestions?

    Thanks,

    Paul C


    Paul Curren Guest

  2. Similar Questions and Discussions

    1. Document Management
      We have six ID users who all touch documents at different times. I need a document management system or manual process that will allow me to...
    2. Document management using Web service
      Hi Is there any document management that microsoft provides? A large organization need a tool that gets information and can generate documents...
    3. [PHP] Document Management App
      You may want to look at Verity's products http://downloadcenter.verity.com/dlc/index.jsp -----Original Message----- From: Jay Blanchard Sent:...
    4. Document Management App
      Howdy & Good Afternoon! I am about to run off to a project's development group meeting (the general audience kind, requestors and developers) and...
    5. document imaging
      I am trying to use Microsoft Document Imaging.... when the pages are scanned, it cuts off the left 1/3 of the page and makes it all black. How can...
  3. #2

    Default Re: Document Imaging and Management

    In article <3F1D0936.4070706@cisco.com>,
    Paul Curren <pcurren@cisco.com> wrote:
    > I've been unsuccessful with my Googling so i'm hoping some of you may be
    > able to give me some pointers. I'm looking for document imaging software
    > for MacOS X. Previously I used Microsoft Office XP Document Imaging so
    > i'm looking for something like that or Scansoft's PaperPort application.
    >
    > Any suggestions?
    Clean up scanned images in GraphicConverter, then save as PDF and manage
    with Acrobat. Acrobat 5 was garbage, but 6 is about halfway decent.

    --
    Linc Davis

    The reply address is valid but will expire within 48 hours.
    Linc Davis Guest

  4. #3

    Default Re: Document Imaging and Management

    I've been coming to a conclusion similar to that.

    To be able to properly search across the PDF files I guess i'd need
    something to OCR the scans before outputting to PDF files (otherwise it
    would just be a PDF containing images of each page). Any suggestions for
    that?

    While this is all manageable it's just a shame there's no Mac
    application that does each document in a single step - on the PC it was
    a "fire and forget" process which was nice.

    Cheers,

    Paul C


    Linc Davis wrote:
    >In article <3F1D0936.4070706@cisco.com>,
    > Paul Curren <pcurren@cisco.com> wrote:
    >
    >
    >
    >>I've been unsuccessful with my Googling so i'm hoping some of you may be
    >>able to give me some pointers. I'm looking for document imaging software
    >>for MacOS X. Previously I used Microsoft Office XP Document Imaging so
    >>i'm looking for something like that or Scansoft's PaperPort application.
    >>
    >>Any suggestions?
    >>
    >>
    >
    >Clean up scanned images in GraphicConverter, then save as PDF and manage
    >with Acrobat. Acrobat 5 was garbage, but 6 is about halfway decent.
    >
    >
    >
    Paul Curren Guest

  5. #4

    Default Re: Document Imaging and Management


    "Paul Curren" <pcurren@cisco.com> wrote in message
    news:3F1E5AA7.6060606@cisco.com...
    > To be able to properly search across the PDF files I guess i'd need
    > something to OCR the scans before outputting to PDF files (otherwise it
    > would just be a PDF containing images of each page). Any suggestions for
    > that?
    Not tried the Mac version, but on the PC Acrobat could do that with a
    (freely) downloadable plug-in. Might want to check the Adobe site.


    Cheers,
    Ian


    Ian McCall Guest

  6. #5

    Default Re: Document Imaging and Management

    In article <ld-temp-f7xd-944559.21564822072003@text.giganews.com>,
    Linc Davis <ld-temp-f7xd@pobox.com> wrote:
    > In article <3F1D0936.4070706@cisco.com>,
    > Paul Curren <pcurren@cisco.com> wrote:
    >
    > > I've been unsuccessful with my Googling so i'm hoping some of you may be
    > > able to give me some pointers. I'm looking for document imaging software
    > > for MacOS X. Previously I used Microsoft Office XP Document Imaging so
    > > i'm looking for something like that or Scansoft's PaperPort application.
    I was a huge PaperPort addict in OS 9. Now in OS X I use OmniPage Pro X,
    which will scan, OCR if you want, and save as PDF. I don't know how
    accurate it is compared to Document Imaging, but that is what I find is
    the best on the Mac.

    --
    Chicago, IL
    Remove "GO" to reply.
    Phil Lefebvre Guest

  7. #6

    Default Re: Document Imaging and Management

    Thanks...i'm having a quick scan of OmniPage on the website at the moment.

    I think it's pretty similar to what came bundled with my scanner
    (ReadIris 7) so i'll give it a shot before deciding whether I need to
    shell out for OminPage.

    Paul C

    Phil Lefebvre wrote:
    >In article <ld-temp-f7xd-944559.21564822072003@text.giganews.com>,
    > Linc Davis <ld-temp-f7xd@pobox.com> wrote:
    >
    >
    >
    >>In article <3F1D0936.4070706@cisco.com>,
    >> Paul Curren <pcurren@cisco.com> wrote:
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>>I've been unsuccessful with my Googling so i'm hoping some of you may be
    >>>able to give me some pointers. I'm looking for document imaging software
    >>>for MacOS X. Previously I used Microsoft Office XP Document Imaging so
    >>>i'm looking for something like that or Scansoft's PaperPort application.
    >>>
    >>>
    >
    >I was a huge PaperPort addict in OS 9. Now in OS X I use OmniPage Pro X,
    >which will scan, OCR if you want, and save as PDF. I don't know how
    >accurate it is compared to Document Imaging, but that is what I find is
    >the best on the Mac.
    >
    >
    >
    Paul Curren Guest

  8. #7

    Default Re: Document Imaging and Management

    In article <3F1FFEB4.1060309@cisco.com>,
    Paul Curren <pcurren@cisco.com> wrote:
    > Thanks...i'm having a quick scan of OmniPage on the website at the moment.
    >
    > I think it's pretty similar to what came bundled with my scanner
    > (ReadIris 7) so i'll give it a shot before deciding whether I need to
    > shell out for OminPage.
    Before paying for Omnipage, consider that it's now owned by Scansoft.
    They're not Mac developers. They buy the rights to Mac software that
    would otherwise be abandoned, and have neither the ability nor the
    inclination to maintain it. That's what they did with PaperPort as well
    as Omnipage. When Omnipage breaks under a future version of the Mac OS,
    expect no help from them. I don't use OCR much, but in Acrobat 6 it's
    about as good as OCR ever is, and if you're going to manage PDF archives
    you need Acrobat anyway. I'm not an advocate for it; there just isn't
    anything else.

    --
    Linc Davis

    The reply address is valid but will expire within 48 hours.
    Linc Davis Guest

  9. #8

    Default Re: Document Imaging and Management

    Thanks again for peoples input. Just by way of conclusion for the
    moment, here's what i'm doing...

    I've discovered that the PDF format seems to support a feature where by
    an image and text can be layered within the one document i.e. I can scan
    a page and have an exact representation of that page image as the visual
    display within the PDF. However, in a layer beneath, the PDF seems to
    hold the text of the scan (i've OCR'd it previously). If you do textual
    searches within the PDF it performs this search on the text layer, and
    makes a pretty good attempt at mapping the selection box onto the
    displayed document image on the visual layer.

    I'm not sure of the technicalities of how this is done, but in usage
    that's what it appears to be doing.

    ReadIris Pro 7 appears to understand (or make use of this feature of PDF
    files) and so creates these documents automatically from the scanner.

    The version of PDF documents created by ReadIris Pro 7 are compatible
    with MacOS 10.2 Finder to the extent that you can search their contents
    directly.Therefore, all my document archiving needs are currently met, I
    have exact representations of all my documents as PDF files, with the
    capability to search amongst the contents of the documents.

    The only slight glitch is that PDF won't support 1 bit (black and white)
    images for it's display layer - meaning that the scanning time is
    greater than it would have to be, and the resultant PDF's are larger
    than they need be.

    I dare say at somepoint in the future I may find this "half-assed"
    solution a bit limiting, and then I may well need to consider the
    Acrobat recommendation, but for now this seems to do the business.

    Cheers,

    Paul C



    Linc Davis wrote:
    >In article <3F1FFEB4.1060309@cisco.com>,
    > Paul Curren <pcurren@cisco.com> wrote:
    >
    >
    >
    >>Thanks...i'm having a quick scan of OmniPage on the website at the moment.
    >>
    >>I think it's pretty similar to what came bundled with my scanner
    >>(ReadIris 7) so i'll give it a shot before deciding whether I need to
    >>shell out for OminPage.
    >>
    >>
    >
    >Before paying for Omnipage, consider that it's now owned by Scansoft.
    >They're not Mac developers. They buy the rights to Mac software that
    >would otherwise be abandoned, and have neither the ability nor the
    >inclination to maintain it. That's what they did with PaperPort as well
    >as Omnipage. When Omnipage breaks under a future version of the Mac OS,
    >expect no help from them. I don't use OCR much, but in Acrobat 6 it's
    >about as good as OCR ever is, and if you're going to manage PDF archives
    >you need Acrobat anyway. I'm not an advocate for it; there just isn't
    >anything else.
    >
    >
    >
    Paul Curren Guest

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139