Duck Type System? ( was: stereotyping...er...way too long:)

Ask a Question related to Ruby, Design and Development.

  1. #1

    Default Re: Duck Type System? ( was: stereotyping...er...way too long:)

    > The title almost came across as "Duck Tape System." Here everyone
    knows
    > that any problem not solvable with duck tape isn't worth solving :-)
    Actually it's "duct tape". People just tend to elide the two T's.
    Taping ducks together has never really caught on...

    - Warren Brown



    Warren Brown Guest

  2. Similar Questions and Discussions

    1. Object of type 'System.String' cannot be converted to type 'System
      I'm trying to get a control from metabuilders.com dual list)to work under ASP.NET 2.0. It worked find under 1.1 and then when i migrated my...
    2. Partial Euphoric Type Checking (Super Duck!?)
      > > you see we have a problem here. it doesn't matter what methods are My view is that neither testing for the presence of a method with a...
    3. Duck Type System? ( was: stereotyping...er...way too long
      Speaking of funny..... I just HAD to respond to this... our Japanese (and other-worldly) cohorts might not understand this, but here in the U.S....
    4. Duck Type System? ( was: stereotyping...er...way too long :)
      a wrote: a good improvement to #respond_to? no doubt, and easily implemented. but duck_signiture would actually insepect a method to...
    5. testing argument type and duck typing, newbie question
      Hi, I have a method taking one argument that can be an integer or a string. How do I test the argument to know if it's a string or an integer?...
  3. #2

    Default Re: Duck Type System? ( was: stereotyping...er...way too long:)

    Warren Brown wrote:
    >>The title almost came across as "Duck Tape System." Here everyone
    >
    > knows
    >
    >>that any problem not solvable with duck tape isn't worth solving
    :-)
    >
    >
    > Actually it's "duct tape". People just tend to elide the two
    T's.
    > Taping ducks together has never really caught on...

    Not true.

    "The original use was to keep the moisture out of the ammunition
    cases. Because it was waterproof, people referred to the tape as
    “Duck
    Tape.” " (From:
    [url]http://www.octanecreative.com/ducttape/DT101/index.html[/url],
    [url]http://www.octanecreative.com/ducttape/duckvsduct.html[/url])





    __________________________________
    Do you Yahoo!?
    Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard
    [url]http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree[/url]

    Michael Campbell Guest

  4. #3

    Default Re: Duck Type System? ( was: stereotyping...er...way too long:)

    --------------020704070101000701060809
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

    No wonder they are always quacking.

    Warren Brown wrote:
    >>The title almost came across as "Duck Tape System." Here everyone
    >>
    >>
    >knows
    >
    >
    >>that any problem not solvable with duck tape isn't worth solving :-)
    >>
    >>
    >
    > Actually it's "duct tape". People just tend to elide the two T's.
    >Taping ducks together has never really caught on...
    >
    > - Warren Brown
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >.
    >
    >
    >

    --
    Seth Kurtzberg
    CTO
    Scottsdale Research and Network Operations Center
    ISEC.us
    [email]seth@isec.us[/email]


    --------------020704070101000701060809--


    Seth Kurtzberg Guest

  5. #4

    Default Re: Duck Type System? ( was: stereotyping...er...way too long:)

    > Actually it's "duct tape". People just tend to elide the two T's.
    > Taping ducks together has never really caught on...
    >
    It was Duck tape before it was Duct tape, because the military used it
    to waterproof their ammunition cases.

    [url]http://www.octanecreative.com/ducttape/duckvsduct.html[/url]

    *chases after some ducks to tape together*


    Gregory Millam Guest

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139