Professional Web Applications Themes

Dynamic range - Photography

The question about the dynamic range of film vs. digital comes up regularly. There is an interesting article about this, for the serious reader, by Kodak researchers. The reference is "Extending the Color Gamut and Dynamic Range of a sRGB Image Uisng a Residual Image", K. E. Spauldin, G. J. Woolfe, and R. L. Joshi, Color Research and Application, Vol. 28, Noi. 4, 251-266 (2003). There is a less technical summary at [url]http://www.kodak.com/US/en/corp/researchDevelopment/technologyFeatures/eri.shtml[/url]. Briefly, the authors point out that both digital images as taken, and film images in the form of negative, have more dynamic range and color gamut than ...

  1. #1

    Default Dynamic range

    The question about the dynamic range of film vs. digital comes up regularly. There is an interesting article about this, for the serious reader, by Kodak researchers. The reference is "Extending the Color Gamut and Dynamic Range of a sRGB Image Uisng a Residual Image", K. E. Spauldin, G. J. Woolfe, and R. L. Joshi, Color Research and Application, Vol. 28, Noi. 4, 251-266 (2003). There is a less technical summary at [url]http://www.kodak.com/US/en/corp/researchDevelopment/technologyFeatures/eri.shtml[/url].

    Briefly, the authors point out that both digital images as taken, and film images in the form of negative, have more dynamic range and color gamut than can be represented in a print or a monitor. The extra dynamic range can be utilized in conventional printing by dodging, and in digital printing by ogous methods.

    Storing digital images in conventional formats loses some of the information. The authors describe a way to capture the information not in a .jpg file, for example, and save it as attached exif, so that the information can later be used. The method is used in some of Kodak's pro-level digicams.
    Marvin Margoshes Guest

  2. #2

    Default Re: Dynamic range

    Word has it that on Tue, 9 Sep 2003 09:50:46 -0400, in this august
    forum, "Marvin Margoshes" <physnospamchemcloud9.net> said:
    >The question about the dynamic range of film vs. digital comes up regularly. There is an interesting article about this, for the serious reader, by Kodak researchers. The reference is "Extending the Color Gamut and Dynamic Range of a sRGB Image Uisng a Residual Image", K. E. Spauldin, G. J. Woolfe, and R. L. Joshi, Color Research and Application, Vol. 28, Noi. 4, 251-266 (2003). There is a less technical summary at [url]http://www.kodak.com/US/en/corp/researchDevelopment/technologyFeatures/eri.shtml[/url].
    Excellent! Thanks for the link, it'll come in handy when I'm explaining
    to people why I shoot in RAW format instead of JPEG format.
    >Briefly, the authors point out that both digital images as taken, and film images in the form of negative, have more dynamic range and color gamut than can be represented in a print or a monitor.
    Exactly as I said in recent thread on the topic in this (RPD) newsgroup.

    --
    W
    . | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because
    \|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est
    ---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------
    Lionel Guest

  3. #3

    Default Re: Dynamic range

    This subject is complicated by the problem that there are really two
    kinds of dynamic range in digital photography.

    The first we could call small signal dynamic range, and is basically
    signal to noise ratio. Film photography has a very high value for this
    kind of dynamic range (at least for most films). The other is the large
    signal ysis, basically the ratio of the largest possible signal to
    the lowest possible signal. Both film and digital has this kind of
    dynamic range. However, if the noise is too high in a digital system,
    this large signal dynamic range is meaningless. Yet that is generally
    the type of dynamic range we discuss in film systems.
    > Marvin Margoshes wrote:
    >
    > The question about the dynamic range of film vs. digital comes up
    > regularly. There is an interesting article about this, for the
    > serious reader, by Kodak researchers. The reference is "Extending the
    > Color Gamut and Dynamic Range of a sRGB Image Uisng a Residual Image",
    > K. E. Spauldin, G. J. Woolfe, and R. L. Joshi, Color Research and
    > Application, Vol. 28, Noi. 4, 251-266 (2003). There is a less
    > technical summary at
    > [url]http://www.kodak.com/US/en/corp/researchDevelopment/technologyFeatures/eri.shtml[/url].
    >
    > Briefly, the authors point out that both digital images as taken, and
    > film images in the form of negative, have more dynamic range and
    > color gamut than can be represented in a print or a monitor. The
    > extra dynamic range can be utilized in conventional printing by
    > dodging, and in digital printing by ogous methods.
    >
    > Storing digital images in conventional formats loses some of the
    > information. The authors describe a way to capture the information
    > not in a .jpg file, for example, and save it as attached exif, so that
    > the information can later be used. The method is used in some of
    > Kodak's pro-level digicams.
    --
    Don Stauffer in Minnesota
    [email]staufferusfamily.net[/email]
    webpage- [url]http://www.usfamily.net/web/stauffer[/url]
    Don Stauffer Guest

  4. #4

    Default Re: Dynamic range


    "Don Stauffer" <net> wrote in message
    news:net... 

    The conventional definition of dynamic range, in all electronics fields I
    know of, is the difference between the smallest signal distinguisable form
    noise and the maximum signal below saturation. The signal-to-noise ratio
    (S/N) is a different parameter. It is best not to confuse apples and
    oranges.
     [/ref]
    http://www.kodak.com/US/en/corp/researchDevelopment/technologyFeatures/eri.shtml. 
    >
    > --
    > Don Stauffer in Minnesota
    > net
    > webpage- http://www.usfamily.net/web/stauffer[/ref]


    Marvin Guest

Similar Threads

  1. Dynamic port range on OS X and older Mac OSes
    By Bev A. Kupf in forum Mac Networking
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: September 2nd, 02:09 PM
  2. Replies: 1
    Last Post: August 2nd, 08:17 PM
  3. Replies: 1
    Last Post: August 2nd, 08:00 PM
  4. #24909 [NEW]: rand function with range always returns low value of range
    By a0 at hush dot com in forum PHP Development
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: August 1st, 07:37 PM
  5. What is the range of dynamic port in AIX 5L?
    By George Baltz in forum AIX
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: July 24th, 01:33 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139