Ask a Question related to Mac Networking, Design and Development.
-
Devi Jankowicz #1
Excessive spam
Ever since I stupidly answered a 'free offer' advert that came along with the
Norton Utilities registration site, I have been flooded with e-mailed spam
adverts. I use my filters, of course, but it's up to 150 a day and getting
worse.
There used to be a special-purpose service (rather like the Mailing
Preference Service for non-electronic postal services) where one could,
supposedly, enter one's details to get one's name _genuinely_ removed from
the marketers' mailing lists. I used it once and it seemed to work, but have
lost the details.
Can any kind soul remind me of the URL please?
Kind regards,
Devi Jankowicz
Devi Jankowicz Guest
-
What's the down-side of excessive resolution?
I've read that too high resolution in your layouts is bad for image quality. Can anyone explain why this is? For instance - the client sends me an... -
Excessive Deadlocking, can anyone help me out?
I'm getting this error: "Error Executing Database Query. Transaction (Process ID 63) was deadlocked on lock resources with another process and... -
SPAM
My daughter is having a problem with spam on her computer. She has Windows XP Home running. I suggested she "stop" "messenger" service by going... -
excessive comments (was: RDoc and i18n)<Pine.LNX.4.44.0310230647410.23172-100000@ool-4355dfae.dyn.optonline.net>
Hi -- On Thu, 23 Oct 2003, Austin Ziegler wrote: But if it's a *really* simple method, in the sense that its name says everything that needs... -
Excessive Memory on Normal dB
I have created a dB that appears to be normal in all aspects. It has 1400 fields, 900+ Scripts and NO DATA INPUT or Photographs. (Not Yet... -
Whytoi #2
Re: Excessive spam
In article
<0001HW.BB849498001C1575F0080600@news.cache.cable. ntlworld.com>, Devi
Jankowicz <animus@ntlworld.com> wrote:
Forget it. I wouldn't trust any of them.> Ever since I stupidly answered a 'free offer' advert that came along with the
> Norton Utilities registration site, I have been flooded with e-mailed spam
> adverts. I use my filters, of course, but it's up to 150 a day and getting
> worse.
> There used to be a special-purpose service (rather like the Mailing
> Preference Service for non-electronic postal services) where one could,
> supposedly, enter one's details to get one's name _genuinely_ removed from
> the marketers' mailing lists. I used it once and it seemed to work, but have
> lost the details.
> Can any kind soul remind me of the URL please?
Options are,
1. Server side filter.
2. Change your email address.
3. Live with it and filter on client side.
Whytoi Guest
-
Howard S Shubs #3
Re: Excessive spam
In article
<0001HW.BB849498001C1575F0080600@news.cache.cable. ntlworld.com>,
Devi Jankowicz <animus@ntlworld.com> wrote:
No such thing in this world. That'd only work for spammers who cared> Can any kind soul remind me of the URL please?
about the people on their lists. Since that's a null set, all you'd be
doing is giving them your information again.
--
Today, on Paper-view: Pulp Fiction!
Howard S Shubs Guest
-
George Williams #4
Re: Excessive spam
Devi Jankowicz wrote:
It would be like sending letters to all the local burglars> There used to be a special-purpose service (rather like the Mailing
> Preference Service for non-electronic postal services) where one could,
> supposedly, enter one's details to get one's name _genuinely_ removed from
> the marketers' mailing lists.
with your address and times you're absent, then asking them
not to steal your jewellery.
George Williams Guest
-
John Baxter #5
Re: Excessive spam
In article
<0001HW.BB849498001C1575F0080600@news.cache.cable. ntlworld.com>,
Devi Jankowicz <animus@ntlworld.com> wrote:
If you actually want to do more than changing your address...> Ever since I stupidly answered a 'free offer' advert that came along with the
> Norton Utilities registration site, I have been flooded with e-mailed spam
> adverts. I use my filters, of course, but it's up to 150 a day and getting
> worse.
> There used to be a special-purpose service (rather like the Mailing
> Preference Service for non-electronic postal services) where one could,
> supposedly, enter one's details to get one's name _genuinely_ removed from
> the marketers' mailing lists. I used it once and it seemed to work, but have
> lost the details.
> Can any kind soul remind me of the URL please?
Start, I think, by looking through
[url]http://www.symantec.com/legal/privacy.html[/url]
Near the bottom is a means of updating your information...update the
email address to a throw-away address you create for the purpose.
See if the flood to your regular address abates (it won't go away). It
will take a while...these are computers, so they're slow. ;-)
If the flood doesn't abate, try the addresses at the very bottom of the
page noted above. Look up Symantec in Standard & Poors or whereever,
and address your (calmly written, with substanting facts) paper letter
to the CEO. CC: the message to a paper mail contact you find within
Trust-e by following the link at the top (CC it by email if necessary).
I use a different and trackable address for every vendor I register a
product with. I haven't received any outpouring of email from my
registration of Windows Norton SystemWorks (I did every available
opt-out, as usual). For problem addresses, I have my ISP silently dump
any mail to the address on the floor...a venerable maker of PDAs can no
longer send me mail at my registered address as a result of the handy
tracking.
(Note...one of the drop-on-the-floor addresses is the email address
appearing in this message.)
--John
--
Email to above address discarded by provider's server. Don't bother sending.
John Baxter Guest
-
Devi Jankowicz #6
Re: Excessive spam
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003 22:20:36 +0100, James Meiss wrote
(in message <jdm-F22A88.15203610092003@peabody.colorado.edu>):
Dear James,> In article
> <0001HW.BB849498001C1575F0080600@news.cache.cable. ntlworld.com>,
> Devi Jankowicz <animus@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>>> Ever since I stupidly answered a 'free offer' advert that came along with
>> the
>> Norton Utilities registration site, I have been flooded with e-mailed spam
>> adverts. I use my filters, of course, but it's up to 150 a day and getting
>> worse.
>> There used to be a special-purpose service (rather like the Mailing
>> Preference Service for non-electronic postal services) where one could,
>> supposedly, enter one's details to get one's name _genuinely_ removed from
>> the marketers' mailing lists. I used it once and it seemed to work, but
>> have
>> lost the details.
>> Can any kind soul remind me of the URL please?
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Devi Jankowicz
>>
> The Direct Marketing association claims to do this. No idea if it
> works...I actually tried it (against my better judgement), but haven't
> noticed any difference. Of course most spam is from scumbags who would
> ignore this list.
>
> See <http://www.dmaconsumers.org/consumers/optoutform_emps.shtml>
>
>
Many thanks: this is the address I had in mind.
Kind regards,
Devi
Devi Jankowicz Guest
-
Devi Jankowicz #7
Re: Excessive spam
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003 22:47:34 +0100, John Baxter wrote
(in message <news.collectivize-B8B318.14473310092003@corp.supernews.com>):
<snip>> In article
> <0001HW.BB849498001C1575F0080600@news.cache.cable. ntlworld.com>,
> Devi Jankowicz <animus@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>>> Ever since I stupidly answered a 'free offer' advert that came along with
>> the
>> Norton Utilities registration site, I have been flooded with e-mailed spam
>> adverts. I use my filters, of course, but it's up to 150 a day and getting
>> worse.
>> There used to be a special-purpose service (rather like the Mailing
>> Preference Service for non-electronic postal services) where one could,
>> supposedly, enter one's details to get one's name _genuinely_ removed from
>> the marketers' mailing lists. I used it once and it seemed to work, but
>> have
>> lost the details.
>> Can any kind soul remind me of the URL please?
> If you actually want to do more than changing your address...
>
> Start, I think, by looking through
> [url]http://www.symantec.com/legal/privacy.html[/url]
>
> Near the bottom is a means of updating your information...update theThanks you for taking the time, John; I shall certainly try this.> --John
>
>
Kind regards,
Devi
Devi Jankowicz Guest
-
John Baxter #8
Re: Excessive spam
In article
<0001HW.BB8567F20009124DF0101600@news.cache.cable. ntlworld.com>,
Devi Jankowicz <animus@ntlworld.com> wrote:
One would expect Symantec and their "carefully selected partners" to> On Wed, 10 Sep 2003 22:47:34 +0100, John Baxter wrote
> (in message <news.collectivize-B8B318.14473310092003@corp.supernews.com>):
>> <snip>> > In article
> > <0001HW.BB849498001C1575F0080600@news.cache.cable. ntlworld.com>,
> > Devi Jankowicz <animus@ntlworld.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> Ever since I stupidly answered a 'free offer' advert that came along with
> >> the
> >> Norton Utilities registration site, I have been flooded with e-mailed spam
> >> adverts. I use my filters, of course, but it's up to 150 a day and getting
> >> worse.
> >> There used to be a special-purpose service (rather like the Mailing
> >> Preference Service for non-electronic postal services) where one could,
> >> supposedly, enter one's details to get one's name _genuinely_ removed from
> >> the marketers' mailing lists. I used it once and it seemed to work, but
> >> have
> >> lost the details.
> >> Can any kind soul remind me of the URL please?
> > If you actually want to do more than changing your address...
> >
> > Start, I think, by looking through
> > [url]http://www.symantec.com/legal/privacy.html[/url]
> >
> > Near the bottom is a means of updating your information...update the>> > --John
> >
> >
> Thanks you for taking the time, John; I shall certainly try this.
>
honor the DMA list. One might, of course, be wrong.
You might want to avoid trying the DMA direct to Symantec solutions at
the same time, so you can tell which one works if the flow actually does
reduce.
--John
--
Email to above address discarded by provider's server. Don't bother sending.
John Baxter Guest



Reply With Quote

