Ask a Question related to Photography, Design and Development.

  1. #1

    Default f1.2 vs. f1.4

    Hi, I've been looking for a good 50mm or 85mm portrait lens and have noticed
    the huge cost difference between the f1.2 and f1.4. Is there that much
    difference?


    Brian Guest

  2. #2

    Default Re: f1.2 vs. f1.4

    > Hi, I've been looking for a good 50mm or 85mm portrait lens and have noticed
    > the huge cost difference between the f1.2 and f1.4. Is there that much
    > difference?
    No.
    Randall Ainsworth Guest

  3. #3

    Default Re: f1.2 vs. f1.4

    On Fri, 05 Sep 2003 23:35:52 GMT, "Brian" <schoolcbSPAM@earthlink.net>
    wrote:
    >Hi, I've been looking for a good 50mm or 85mm portrait lens and have noticed
    >the huge cost difference between the f1.2 and f1.4. Is there that much
    >difference?
    It is half a stop. Usually that would make a difference only in
    situations with pretty low light. I would recommend the 1.4 unless
    you shoot in very low light.

    Jan Philips Guest

  4. #4

    Default Re: f1.2 vs. f1.4

    is it 1/2 a stop? don't know for sure, but questioning.

    my guess is that the money difference is not just paying for the faster
    f-stop. probably better construction/glass. also, does the 1.2 have macro
    features?

    David

    "Jan Philips" <judmccr@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
    news:4ojilvcemdj6l5i9vld2qmn08bfbm36md1@4ax.com...
    > On Fri, 05 Sep 2003 23:35:52 GMT, "Brian" <schoolcbSPAM@earthlink.net>
    > wrote:
    >
    > >Hi, I've been looking for a good 50mm or 85mm portrait lens and have
    noticed
    > >the huge cost difference between the f1.2 and f1.4. Is there that much
    > >difference?
    >
    > It is half a stop. Usually that would make a difference only in
    > situations with pretty low light. I would recommend the 1.4 unless
    > you shoot in very low light.
    >

    David Guest

  5. #5

    Default Re: f1.2 vs. f1.4

    On Sat, 6 Sep 2003 08:51:54 -0400, "David"
    <dkbowmanspamisreallyannoying@cox.net> wrote:
    >is it 1/2 a stop? don't know for sure, but questioning.
    Yes, approximately. f/1.414 is a full stop slower than f/1 and
    f/1.189 is half stop slower than f/1 and half stop faster than
    f/1.414.

    Jan Philips Guest

  6. #6

    Default Re: f1.2 vs. f1.4

    Depends on your application. For when I shoot sports indoors yes
    there is a difference as I am wide open at times to be able to capture
    the action. FOr portraits no the 1.4 is fine. Heack a F4 is fine as
    you are using strobes anyway.

    Kev


    On Fri, 05 Sep 2003 23:35:52 GMT, "Brian" <schoolcbSPAM@earthlink.net>
    wrote:
    >Hi, I've been looking for a good 50mm or 85mm portrait lens and have noticed
    >the huge cost difference between the f1.2 and f1.4. Is there that much
    >difference?
    >
    Kev Guest

  7. #7

    Default Re: f1.2 vs. f1.4

    > Depends on your application. For when I shoot sports indoors yes
    > there is a difference as I am wide open at times to be able to capture
    > the action. FOr portraits no the 1.4 is fine. Heack a F4 is fine as
    > you are using strobes anyway.
    You're not going to see an appreciable difference in low light
    situations. It's not even half a stop.
    Randall Ainsworth Guest

  8. #8

    Default Re: f1.2 vs. f1.4

    On Fri, 05 Sep 2003 23:35:52 GMT, "Brian" <schoolcbSPAM@earthlink.net>
    wrote:
    >Hi, I've been looking for a good 50mm or 85mm portrait lens and have noticed
    >the huge cost difference between the f1.2 and f1.4. Is there that much
    >difference?

    Assumming you're talking about 35mm cameras here...

    50mm really isn't a "portrait lens". It's just the "standard" lense.
    85mm is a great focal length for portraits...and most brands offer
    their 85mm in f1.2 and f1.8. For the average person, I'd say the f1.8
    would be more than sufficient. Unless you are doing this for a living
    and are making good money, I doubt you'd want to spend the extra money
    for the faster lens. Yes, it'd be great to have that little bit
    larger aperture in some situations, but there's a good chance you'd
    never use it fully open.

    Slingblade Guest

  9. #9

    Default Re: f1.2 vs. f1.4

    On Sat, 06 Sep 2003 11:12:17 -0700, Randall Ainsworth
    <rag@nospam.techline.com> wrote:
    > You're not going to see an appreciable difference in low light
    >situations. It's not even half a stop.
    Comparing exactly f/1.2 to exactly f/1.4; f/1.2 is 0.4478 stop faster,
    but in practice the 1.2 and 1.4 are rounded off. Half stop faster
    than f/1.4 is called f/1.2.

    Jan Philips Guest

  10. #10

    Default f1.2 vs. f1.4

    Comparing exactly f/1.2 to exactly f/1.4; f/1.2 is 0.4478 stop faster,
    but in practice the 1.2 and 1.4 are rounded off. Half stop faster
    than f/1.4 is called f/1.2.[/QUOTE]

    I believe it is 1/3 stop.
    The stop can be aslo defined as the area of opened aperture, and the area is propotion (to the power of 2) to the diameter of a circle. 1.4 ^2 /1.2 ^ 2 = 1.36 .
    so, it is about 1/3 stop.
    Frank Guest

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139