Ask a Question related to Macromedia Freehand, Design and Development.
-
darrel #1
FH10 + OSX = Pure Crap?
I have the MX studio at work (Win2K) and at home (OSX - Jaguar). I haven't
used FH much at home...only at work lately.
On Win2K it certainly has it's fair share of incredibly annoying bugs and
quirks that were never fixed. However, last night I actually tried to use
FH10 for a period of time on my Mac and it was pure hell! Cursors wouldn't
change (Had to do everything with the text cursor) I couldn't select text. I
couldn't enter new leading values and have them 'stick'. Redrawing was utter
crap. Performance painful.
Ugh.
Good-bye Freehand. I am no longer recommending it to anyone on either
platform.
-Darrel
darrel Guest
-
HELP! Fh10 not recognizing archived fh10 files....?
I am running FH10 on Windows 2000 professional, and I am trying to open a FH10 file that I have saved on a CD. I put it on my hard drive and tried to... -
FIX THIS PIECE OF CRAP NOW!!!!
Dear Macromedia, I am begging you to PLEASE fix this piece of crap called Freehand. I have wasted time and money trying to distort and output a... -
Mac FH10 to PC FH10 problems
I've read all the posts I could find on this but still no luck: Ad agency guys use Mac Freehand 10 to create print art. We wanna use these... -
Spam and crap
As much as I enjoy visiting this newsgroup I have reluctantly decided that until whoever is in charge of it gets a grip on themsleves and stops all... -
Opening fh10 mac files in windows fh10 ???????
scottrking wrote: FreeHand files are cross-platform. For use on Windows, make sure the files have the .fh10 extension to the filename. Add it... -
darrel #2
Re: Re:FH10 + OSX = Pure Crap?
> Try FHMX on your Mac with OSX, in spite of its many continuing problems,
MM lost me when they asked for me to pay for their bug fixes. Sorry, I just> it runs considerably better than FH10 did on any platform or OS.
can't. I think I'm going to look more seriously at StoneDesign's offerings
this time.
I did use MX on the PC in trial mode. It certainly fixed some of the major
problems I had. FH10 should never have been released and MM should never
have expected customers to pay for their bug fixes. I got my new company to
buy me the entire MX studio and then I had to ask them to buy FHMX because
the software they bough the first time wasn't any good. Make me look like a
genius.
But we've been through all this before. ;o)
-Darrel
darrel Guest
-
Bill #3
Re: Re:FH10 + OSX = Pure Crap?
On Fri, 1 Aug 2003 21:25:57 +0000 (UTC), Pappy <rlambert@carsondellosa.com>
wrote:
Especially that 'Free Upgrades for Lifes' feature. Almost makes me wish I> I have heard of Stone before, but never went to look at their stuff.
> Wow, the feature list and the pricing are pretty impressive.
was a Mac user.
--
Bill
Bill Guest
-
Paul Harris #4
Re: FH10 + OSX = Pure Crap?
In article <bgeat0$li4$1@forums.macromedia.com>, Pappy
<rlambert@carsondellosa.com> wrote:
> Overall, FHMX is better than FH10 but not quite as good as FH9 in
> performance, stability, and all around useability. Download the trial
> version and give it a go.
Pappy:
How well does exporting in PDF format work in MMX? I could never get
this working right in FH10, and that was one of my major frustrations
with the program.
Regards,
Paul Harris
Paul Harris Guest



Reply With Quote

