Flash Media Server vs Flash Remoting

Ask a Question related to Macromedia Flash Flashcom, Design and Development.

  1. #1

    Default Flash Media Server vs Flash Remoting

    I was wondering what are the pros and cons of moving our text based broadcast
    service from Flash Remoting to Flash Media server. Right now we have the client
    flash file retrieve messages via the Flashservice Gateway installed by
    Coldfusion 7. As of this moment we do not see the need for audio or video
    interaction. Also it is a broadcast system so we send messages to our clients,
    the do not send messages back. A one way chat if you will.

    Of course cost is a factor, but outside of cost, how much of a benefit would
    it be? Or would it be overkill so to speak.
    Is the server load reduced or greater? Is it better for the client system? How
    is bandwidth affected? This topic has come up a few times... but I would like
    to ask the pros for thier suggestions.

    Thanks in advance for your comments.
    Johnny

    SincityViper Guest

  2. Similar Questions and Discussions

    1. Flash Remoting on WebLogic App Server
      Hi! Ok, I have an application on my location machine that works great; no problems. I created a .WAR file of this application and installed it on...
    2. Flash Media Server 2 vs. Flash Comm 1.5 MX
      Ok our company has a license for Flash Communication Server 1.5 for 500 max connections and 10 mbps. How does this new Flash Media Server 2...
    3. Flash communication server VS Flash Media server
      Hi guys! In flash communication server, you could had up to 2500 users with a single Professional Edition, but with Flash Media Server, it's only...
    4. Flash Com. Server and it's Remoting
      Hi all! I am using the following remoting code: var nc = new NetConnection; nc.connect("http://localhost/flashservices/gateway.aspx"); ...
    5. Does Flash Communication server include Flash remoting ?
      We plan to use Flash communication server and flash remoting. Now the most simple question, does the com-server already include flash remoting ? ...
  3. #2

    Default Re: Flash Media Server vs Flash Remoting

    I suppose you'd save a little bandwidth going with FMS since there would be no
    need for constant polling of the server, but in the end i don't think the
    difference in bandwidth usage would justify the investment of FMS. The only
    real benefit I see is that the stateful connection to FMS reduces latency
    between updates (as opposed to polling the remoting server every few seconds).

    If you like the idea of a stateful connnection to the server, I would think a
    better option would be either Flex Data services or an XML socket server. FMS
    really is overkill for something like the application you described.

    JayCharles Guest

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139