Ask a Question related to Ruby, Design and Development.
-
Christopher C.Aycock #1
Formal Language Semantics
Does anyone know where I can get the formal language semantics for Ruby
(assuming such a thing exists)?
Thank you,
Christopher Aycock
Oxford University Computing Lab
Christopher C.Aycock Guest
-
A formal request.
I would like to formally address an issue regarding Adobe's support of the Linux platform. As a professional, I have been using Linux for years.... -
SQL Query Against Normal Formal Tables
In my database, I have a table of event/activity listings (in a table called "listing" for example) that are displayed on a web site. Each listing... -
How to import symbols and semantics from one namespace into another
Hi, this question has to do with importing names from one package into another. In my case, both packages reside in the same file, and I simply want... -
flock() semantics?
Hi all, I'm writing an app which uses a flat file to store a *short* list of simple key/value pairs. However having read the flock() man page,... -
module_function semantics
Hi all! I'm trying to understand some code in the stdlib (drb/drb.rb, to be particular). Is there any difference between: module Foo ... -
Yukihiro Matsumoto #2
Re: Formal Language Semantics
Hi,
In message "Formal Language Semantics"
on 03/10/21, Christopher C.Aycock <christopher.aycock@christ-church.oxford.ac.uk> writes:
|Does anyone know where I can get the formal language semantics for Ruby
|(assuming such a thing exists)?
Unfortunately no. I am too casual person to be formal.
matz.
Yukihiro Matsumoto Guest
-
Christopher C.Aycock #3
Re: Formal Language Semantics
Hello Matz,
Thanks for your response; at least I can stop looking now. :)
Anyway, the reason I wanted the semantics is that I'm creating a
"Parallel Ruby" as part of my dissertation. The goal is to be like High
Performance Fortran, only with a much better base language and much
cleaner extensions. I was just hoping to find all the information I can
about the design of the Ruby system.
Thank you,
Chris
On Tuesday, October 21, 2003, at 12:17 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In message "Formal Language Semantics"
> on 03/10/21, Christopher C.Aycock
> <christopher.aycock@christ-church.oxford.ac.uk> writes:
>
> |Does anyone know where I can get the formal language semantics for
> Ruby
> |(assuming such a thing exists)?
>
> Unfortunately no. I am too casual person to be formal.
>
> matz.
>
>
Christopher C.Aycock Guest
-
Mauricio Fernández #4
Re: Formal Language Semantics
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 11:23:22PM +0900, Christopher C. Aycock wrote:
Any possibility we might be able to see that someday?> Hello Matz,
>
> Thanks for your response; at least I can stop looking now. :)
>
> Anyway, the reason I wanted the semantics is that I'm creating a
> "Parallel Ruby" as part of my dissertation. The goal is to be like High
This sounds very interesting.
--> Performance Fortran, only with a much better base language and much
> cleaner extensions. I was just hoping to find all the information I can
> about the design of the Ruby system.
_ _
| |__ __ _| |_ ___ _ __ ___ __ _ _ __
| '_ \ / _` | __/ __| '_ ` _ \ / _` | '_ \
| |_) | (_| | |_\__ \ | | | | | (_| | | | |
|_.__/ \__,_|\__|___/_| |_| |_|\__,_|_| |_|
Running Debian GNU/Linux Sid (unstable)
batsman dot geo at yahoo dot com
<dark> Turns out that grep returns error code 1 when there are no matches.
I KNEW that. Why did it take me half an hour?
-- Seen on #Debian
Mauricio Fernández Guest
-
Phil Tomson #5
Re: Formal Language Semantics
In article <6BBA6A24-03D2-11D8-8BBD-0003936520E6@chch.ox.ac.uk>,
Christopher C.Aycock <christopher.aycock@christ-church.oxford.ac.uk> wrote:Interesting, can you tell us more?>Hello Matz,
>
>Thanks for your response; at least I can stop looking now. :)
>
>Anyway, the reason I wanted the semantics is that I'm creating a
>"Parallel Ruby" as part of my dissertation. The goal is to be like High
>Performance Fortran, only with a much better base language and much
>cleaner extensions.
Phil
Phil Tomson Guest



Reply With Quote

