Formal Language Semantics

Ask a Question related to Ruby, Design and Development.

  1. #1

    Default Formal Language Semantics

    Does anyone know where I can get the formal language semantics for Ruby
    (assuming such a thing exists)?

    Thank you,
    Christopher Aycock
    Oxford University Computing Lab



    Christopher C.Aycock Guest

  2. Similar Questions and Discussions

    1. A formal request.
      I would like to formally address an issue regarding Adobe's support of the Linux platform. As a professional, I have been using Linux for years....
    2. SQL Query Against Normal Formal Tables
      In my database, I have a table of event/activity listings (in a table called "listing" for example) that are displayed on a web site. Each listing...
    3. How to import symbols and semantics from one namespace into another
      Hi, this question has to do with importing names from one package into another. In my case, both packages reside in the same file, and I simply want...
    4. flock() semantics?
      Hi all, I'm writing an app which uses a flat file to store a *short* list of simple key/value pairs. However having read the flock() man page,...
    5. module_function semantics
      Hi all! I'm trying to understand some code in the stdlib (drb/drb.rb, to be particular). Is there any difference between: module Foo ...
  3. #2

    Default Re: Formal Language Semantics

    Hi,

    In message "Formal Language Semantics"
    on 03/10/21, Christopher C.Aycock <christopher.aycock@christ-church.oxford.ac.uk> writes:

    |Does anyone know where I can get the formal language semantics for Ruby
    |(assuming such a thing exists)?

    Unfortunately no. I am too casual person to be formal.

    matz.

    Yukihiro Matsumoto Guest

  4. #3

    Default Re: Formal Language Semantics

    Hello Matz,

    Thanks for your response; at least I can stop looking now. :)

    Anyway, the reason I wanted the semantics is that I'm creating a
    "Parallel Ruby" as part of my dissertation. The goal is to be like High
    Performance Fortran, only with a much better base language and much
    cleaner extensions. I was just hoping to find all the information I can
    about the design of the Ruby system.

    Thank you,
    Chris

    On Tuesday, October 21, 2003, at 12:17 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
    > Hi,
    >
    > In message "Formal Language Semantics"
    > on 03/10/21, Christopher C.Aycock
    > <christopher.aycock@christ-church.oxford.ac.uk> writes:
    >
    > |Does anyone know where I can get the formal language semantics for
    > Ruby
    > |(assuming such a thing exists)?
    >
    > Unfortunately no. I am too casual person to be formal.
    >
    > matz.
    >
    >

    Christopher C.Aycock Guest

  5. #4

    Default Re: Formal Language Semantics

    On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 11:23:22PM +0900, Christopher C. Aycock wrote:
    > Hello Matz,
    >
    > Thanks for your response; at least I can stop looking now. :)
    >
    > Anyway, the reason I wanted the semantics is that I'm creating a
    > "Parallel Ruby" as part of my dissertation. The goal is to be like High
    Any possibility we might be able to see that someday?
    This sounds very interesting.
    > Performance Fortran, only with a much better base language and much
    > cleaner extensions. I was just hoping to find all the information I can
    > about the design of the Ruby system.
    --
    _ _
    | |__ __ _| |_ ___ _ __ ___ __ _ _ __
    | '_ \ / _` | __/ __| '_ ` _ \ / _` | '_ \
    | |_) | (_| | |_\__ \ | | | | | (_| | | | |
    |_.__/ \__,_|\__|___/_| |_| |_|\__,_|_| |_|
    Running Debian GNU/Linux Sid (unstable)
    batsman dot geo at yahoo dot com

    <dark> Turns out that grep returns error code 1 when there are no matches.
    I KNEW that. Why did it take me half an hour?
    -- Seen on #Debian

    Mauricio Fernández Guest

  6. #5

    Default Re: Formal Language Semantics

    In article <6BBA6A24-03D2-11D8-8BBD-0003936520E6@chch.ox.ac.uk>,
    Christopher C.Aycock <christopher.aycock@christ-church.oxford.ac.uk> wrote:
    >Hello Matz,
    >
    >Thanks for your response; at least I can stop looking now. :)
    >
    >Anyway, the reason I wanted the semantics is that I'm creating a
    >"Parallel Ruby" as part of my dissertation. The goal is to be like High
    >Performance Fortran, only with a much better base language and much
    >cleaner extensions.
    Interesting, can you tell us more?

    Phil
    Phil Tomson Guest

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139