Professional Web Applications Themes

Frames Vs. iFrame - ASP.NET General

IFrame is only supported by internet explorer. It's great as long as no other browsers need access to your application. Sincerely, -- S. Justin Gengo, MCP Web Developer Free code library at: [url]www.aboutfortunate.com[/url] "Out of chaos comes order." Nietzche "IntraRELY" <IntraRELY> wrote in message news:%23UcmjTSXDHA.1888TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... > I have used HTML frames in the pas for static HTML site. I am developing an > ASP.NET web application and I wanted to host the menu in a frame so the > client only downloads the content, not the menu which doesnt change. Is > iFrame the best method to accomplish this? > ...

  1. #1

    Default Re: Frames Vs. iFrame

    IFrame is only supported by internet explorer. It's great as long as no
    other browsers need access to your application.

    Sincerely,

    --
    S. Justin Gengo, MCP
    Web Developer

    Free code library at:
    [url]www.aboutfortunate.com[/url]

    "Out of chaos comes order."
    Nietzche


    "IntraRELY" <IntraRELY> wrote in message
    news:%23UcmjTSXDHA.1888TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
    > I have used HTML frames in the pas for static HTML site. I am developing
    an
    > ASP.NET web application and I wanted to host the menu in a frame so the
    > client only downloads the content, not the menu which doesnt change. Is
    > iFrame the best method to accomplish this?
    >
    > TIA,
    >
    > Steve Wofford
    > [url]www.IntraRELY.com[/url]
    >
    >

    S. Justin Gengo Guest

  2. #2

    Default Re: Frames Vs. iFrame

    Not true. Netscape works fine using IFrame. As a matter of fact combinations
    of User Controls and IFrames make for very efficient design.



    "George Durzi" <gdurzinospam_hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:eDJjHtSXDHA.1680tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
    > Have you thought of a User Control (ascx)?
    >
    > "S. Justin Gengo" <sjgengoaboutfortunate.com> wrote in message
    > news:ex9A1bSXDHA.1640TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
    > > IFrame is only supported by internet explorer. It's great as long as no
    > > other browsers need access to your application.
    > >
    > > Sincerely,
    > >
    > > --
    > > S. Justin Gengo, MCP
    > > Web Developer
    > >
    > > Free code library at:
    > > [url]www.aboutfortunate.com[/url]
    > >
    > > "Out of chaos comes order."
    > > Nietzche
    > >
    > >
    > > "IntraRELY" <IntraRELY> wrote in message
    > > news:%23UcmjTSXDHA.1888TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
    > > > I have used HTML frames in the pas for static HTML site. I am
    developing
    > > an
    > > > ASP.NET web application and I wanted to host the menu in a frame so
    the
    > > > client only downloads the content, not the menu which doesnt change.
    Is
    > > > iFrame the best method to accomplish this?
    > > >
    > > > TIA,
    > > >
    > > > Steve Wofford
    > > > [url]www.IntraRELY.com[/url]
    > > >
    > > >
    > >
    > >
    >
    >

    Seaside Guest

  3. #3

    Default Re: Frames Vs. iFrame

    Hi Steve

    Here a link about ASP.NET Menu
    <[url]http://www.asp.net/ControlGallery/ControlDetail.aspx?Control=124&tabindex=2[/url]
    >
    Hope this is helpful.

    Best regards,
    Lewis

    This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.


    --------------------
    | From: "IntraRELY" <IntraRELY>
    | References: <#UcmjTSXDHA.1888TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl>
    <ex9A1bSXDHA.1640TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl>
    <eDJjHtSXDHA.1680tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl>
    <OgMJbxSXDHA.652tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl>
    <eKgmjDUXDHA.2204TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl>
    | Subject: Re: Frames Vs. iFrame
    | Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 17:29:57 -0700
    | Lines: 90
    | X-Priority: 3
    | X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    | X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
    | X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
    | Message-ID: <OViNBOUXDHA.2640TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl>
    | Newsgroups: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet
    | NNTP-Posting-Host: wsip-68-106-74-63.oc.oc.cox.net 68.106.74.63
    | Path: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTN GP09.phx.gbl
    | Xref: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet:165985
    | X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet
    |
    | Thanks for the input. User Controls are new to me. I tried the I frame for
    | my ASP.Net Menu and was a bad way to do it. As I stated the application
    will
    | consist of a Menu, that I want to look and function similar to
    | microsoft.com, however I dont want to reload the whole page, rather just
    the
    | conent. Unless someone can advise otherwise. The content will be datagrids
    | and forms. If there is anything you can add thanks.
    |
    | Steve Wofford
    | [url]www.IntraRELY.com[/url]
    |
    |
    | "Mikael Engdahl" <mikael-lengdahl.no.spam.com> wrote in message
    | news:eKgmjDUXDHA.2204TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
    | > Not true. Iframes are bad because it totally breakes the
    | > semantics of the page, besides, they are deprecated in
    | > W3C standards.
    | >
    | > User Controls is no doubt the best solution here.
    | >
    | >
    | >
    | > Seaside wrote:
    | >
    | > > Not true. Netscape works fine using IFrame. As a matter of fact
    | combinations
    | > > of User Controls and IFrames make for very efficient design.
    | > >
    | > >
    | > >
    | > > "George Durzi" <gdurzinospam_hotmail.com> wrote in message
    | > > news:eDJjHtSXDHA.1680tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
    | > >
    | > >>Have you thought of a User Control (ascx)?
    | > >>
    | > >>"S. Justin Gengo" <sjgengoaboutfortunate.com> wrote in message
    | > >>news:ex9A1bSXDHA.1640TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
    | > >>
    | > >>>IFrame is only supported by internet explorer. It's great as long as
    no
    | > >>>other browsers need access to your application.
    | > >>>
    | > >>>Sincerely,
    | > >>>
    | > >>>--
    | > >>>S. Justin Gengo, MCP
    | > >>>Web Developer
    | > >>>
    | > >>>Free code library at:
    | > >>>[url]www.aboutfortunate.com[/url]
    | > >>>
    | > >>>"Out of chaos comes order."
    | > >>> Nietzche
    | > >>>
    | > >>>
    | > >>>"IntraRELY" <IntraRELY> wrote in message
    | > >>>news:%23UcmjTSXDHA.1888TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl. ..
    | > >>>
    | > >>>>I have used HTML frames in the pas for static HTML site. I am
    | > >
    | > > developing
    | > >
    | > >>>an
    | > >>>
    | > >>>>ASP.NET web application and I wanted to host the menu in a frame so
    | > >
    | > > the
    | > >
    | > >>>>client only downloads the content, not the menu which doesnt change.
    | > >
    | > > Is
    | > >
    | > >>>>iFrame the best method to accomplish this?
    | > >>>>
    | > >>>>TIA,
    | > >>>>
    | > >>>>Steve Wofford
    | > >>>>[url]www.IntraRELY.com[/url]
    | > >>>>
    | > >>>>
    | > >>>
    | > >>>
    | > >>
    | > >
    | > >
    | >
    | >
    | > --
    | > Mikael Engdahl
    | >
    |
    |
    |

    Lewis Wang [MSFT] Guest

  4. #4

    Default Re: Frames Vs. iFrame

    Hi Steve,

    I don't see any content in your reply.

    I understand the ASP .NET menu mentioned in my previous post is not free.
    So, if the issue is not resolved, just let me know. Thanks.

    Best regards,
    Lewis

    This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
    --------------------
    | From: "IntraRELY" <com>
    | References: <#phx.gbl>
    <phx.gbl>
    <phx.gbl>
    <phx.gbl>
    <phx.gbl>
    | Subject: Re: Frames Vs. iFrame
    | Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 09:15:47 -0700
    | Lines: 80
    | X-Priority: 3
    | X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    | X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
    | X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
    | Message-ID: <O#phx.gbl>
    | Newsgroups: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet
    | NNTP-Posting-Host: wsip-68-106-74-63.oc.oc.cox.net 68.106.74.63
    | Path: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!tk2msftn gp13.phx.gbl
    | Xref: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet:166166
    | X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet
    |
    |
    | "Mikael Engdahl" <no.spam.com> wrote in message
    | news:phx.gbl...
    | > Not true. Iframes are bad because it totally breakes the
    | > semantics of the page, besides, they are deprecated in
    | > W3C standards.
    | >
    | > User Controls is no doubt the best solution here.
    | >
    | >
    | >
    | > Seaside wrote:
    | >
    | > > Not true. Netscape works fine using IFrame. As a matter of fact
    | combinations
    | > > of User Controls and IFrames make for very efficient design.
    | > >
    | > >
    | > >
    | > > "George Durzi" <com> wrote in message
    | > > news:phx.gbl...
    | > >
    | > >>Have you thought of a User Control (ascx)?
    | > >>
    | > >>"S. Justin Gengo" <com> wrote in message
    | > >>news:phx.gbl...
    | > >>
    | > >>>IFrame is only supported by internet explorer. It's great as long as
    no
    | > >>>other browsers need access to your application.
    | > >>>
    | > >>>Sincerely,
    | > >>>
    | > >>>--
    | > >>>S. Justin Gengo, MCP
    | > >>>Web Developer
    | > >>>
    | > >>>Free code library at:
    | > >>>www.aboutfortunate.com
    | > >>>
    | > >>>"Out of chaos comes order."
    | > >>> Nietzche
    | > >>>
    | > >>>
    | > >>>"IntraRELY" <com> wrote in message
    | > >>>news:%phx.gbl...
    | > >>>
    | > >>>>I have used HTML frames in the pas for static HTML site. I am
    | > >
    | > > developing
    | > >
    | > >>>an
    | > >>>
    | > >>>>ASP.NET web application and I wanted to host the menu in a frame so
    | > >
    | > > the
    | > >
    | > >>>>client only downloads the content, not the menu which doesnt change.
    | > >
    | > > Is
    | > >
    | > >>>>iFrame the best method to accomplish this?
    | > >>>>
    | > >>>>TIA,
    | > >>>>
    | > >>>>Steve Wofford
    | > >>>>www.IntraRELY.com
    | > >>>>
    | > >>>>
    | > >>>
    | > >>>
    | > >>
    | > >
    | > >
    | >
    | >
    | > --
    | > Mikael Engdahl
    | >
    |
    |
    |

    Lewis Guest

  5. #5

    Default Re: Frames Vs. iFrame

    Thanks Lewis,

    I am going to use iFrames to hold the datagrids and other various database
    bound components. The ASPNet Menu is sitting on the default page and
    refreshing the data. I took a look at MS CRM, which my application is very
    similar to and they used what looks like a combination of Frames and
    IFrames. So I think I made the right decision. User controls, although can
    be cached, still presented not truely reusing as a Frame/IFrame only uses
    one instance of the object over and over and is what I am aiming for.

    Thanks for you help,

    Steve Wofford
    www.IntraRELY.com

    "Lewis Wang [MSFT]" <microsoft.com> wrote in message
    news:%phx.gbl... 
    rights. 
    microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet:166166 
    as 
    so 
    change. 


    IntraRELY Guest

  6. #6

    Default Re: Frames Vs. iFrame

    Hi Steve,

    Thank you for the update. I'm very glad that the information is helpful.

    Best regards,
    Lewis

    This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

    --------------------
    | From: "IntraRELY" <com>
    | References: <#phx.gbl>
    <phx.gbl>
    <phx.gbl>
    <phx.gbl>
    <phx.gbl>
    <O#phx.gbl>
    <#phx.gbl>
    | Subject: Re: Frames Vs. iFrame
    | Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 10:30:26 -0700
    | Lines: 139
    | X-Priority: 3
    | X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    | X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
    | X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
    | Message-ID: <#9QXd$phx.gbl>
    | Newsgroups: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet
    | NNTP-Posting-Host: wsip-68-106-74-63.oc.oc.cox.net 68.106.74.63
    | Path: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTN GP10.phx.gbl
    | Xref: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet:167573
    | X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet
    |
    | Thanks Lewis,
    |
    | I am going to use iFrames to hold the datagrids and other various database
    | bound components. The ASPNet Menu is sitting on the default page and
    | refreshing the data. I took a look at MS CRM, which my application is very
    | similar to and they used what looks like a combination of Frames and
    | IFrames. So I think I made the right decision. User controls, although can
    | be cached, still presented not truely reusing as a Frame/IFrame only uses
    | one instance of the object over and over and is what I am aiming for.
    |
    | Thanks for you help,
    |
    | Steve Wofford
    | www.IntraRELY.com
    |
    | "Lewis Wang [MSFT]" <microsoft.com> wrote in message
    | news:%phx.gbl...
    | > Hi Steve,
    | >
    | > I don't see any content in your reply.
    | >
    | > I understand the ASP .NET menu mentioned in my previous post is not
    free.
    | > So, if the issue is not resolved, just let me know. Thanks.
    | >
    | > Best regards,
    | > Lewis
    | >
    | > This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
    | rights.
    | > --------------------
    | > | From: "IntraRELY" <com>
    | > | References: <#phx.gbl>
    | > <phx.gbl>
    | > <phx.gbl>
    | > <phx.gbl>
    | > <phx.gbl>
    | > | Subject: Re: Frames Vs. iFrame
    | > | Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 09:15:47 -0700
    | > | Lines: 80
    | > | X-Priority: 3
    | > | X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    | > | X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
    | > | X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
    | > | Message-ID: <O#phx.gbl>
    | > | Newsgroups: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet
    | > | NNTP-Posting-Host: wsip-68-106-74-63.oc.oc.cox.net 68.106.74.63
    | > | Path: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!tk2msftn gp13.phx.gbl
    | > | Xref: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl
    | microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet:166166
    | > | X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet
    | > |
    | > |
    | > | "Mikael Engdahl" <no.spam.com> wrote in message
    | > | news:phx.gbl...
    | > | > Not true. Iframes are bad because it totally breakes the
    | > | > semantics of the page, besides, they are deprecated in
    | > | > W3C standards.
    | > | >
    | > | > User Controls is no doubt the best solution here.
    | > | >
    | > | >
    | > | >
    | > | > Seaside wrote:
    | > | >
    | > | > > Not true. Netscape works fine using IFrame. As a matter of fact
    | > | combinations
    | > | > > of User Controls and IFrames make for very efficient design.
    | > | > >
    | > | > >
    | > | > >
    | > | > > "George Durzi" <com> wrote in message
    | > | > > news:phx.gbl...
    | > | > >
    | > | > >>Have you thought of a User Control (ascx)?
    | > | > >>
    | > | > >>"S. Justin Gengo" <com> wrote in message
    | > | > >>news:phx.gbl...
    | > | > >>
    | > | > >>>IFrame is only supported by internet explorer. It's great as long
    | as
    | > no
    | > | > >>>other browsers need access to your application.
    | > | > >>>
    | > | > >>>Sincerely,
    | > | > >>>
    | > | > >>>--
    | > | > >>>S. Justin Gengo, MCP
    | > | > >>>Web Developer
    | > | > >>>
    | > | > >>>Free code library at:
    | > | > >>>www.aboutfortunate.com
    | > | > >>>
    | > | > >>>"Out of chaos comes order."
    | > | > >>> Nietzche
    | > | > >>>
    | > | > >>>
    | > | > >>>"IntraRELY" <com> wrote in message
    | > | > >>>news:%phx.gbl...
    | > | > >>>
    | > | > >>>>I have used HTML frames in the pas for static HTML site. I am
    | > | > >
    | > | > > developing
    | > | > >
    | > | > >>>an
    | > | > >>>
    | > | > >>>>ASP.NET web application and I wanted to host the menu in a frame
    | so
    | > | > >
    | > | > > the
    | > | > >
    | > | > >>>>client only downloads the content, not the menu which doesnt
    | change.
    | > | > >
    | > | > > Is
    | > | > >
    | > | > >>>>iFrame the best method to accomplish this?
    | > | > >>>>
    | > | > >>>>TIA,
    | > | > >>>>
    | > | > >>>>Steve Wofford
    | > | > >>>>www.IntraRELY.com
    | > | > >>>>
    | > | > >>>>
    | > | > >>>
    | > | > >>>
    | > | > >>
    | > | > >
    | > | > >
    | > | >
    | > | >
    | > | > --
    | > | > Mikael Engdahl
    | > | >
    | > |
    | > |
    | > |
    | >
    |
    |
    |

    Lewis Guest

Similar Threads

  1. iFrame
    By Brad in forum HTML & CSS
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: May 2nd, 05:42 PM
  2. iframes or regular frames? Framesets or iframe?
    By piecoO in forum Macromedia Dynamic HTML
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: May 28th, 01:41 AM
  3. IFrame not working
    By shenry in forum Coldfusion - Advanced Techniques
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: February 17th, 03:11 PM
  4. [JS] iFrame.
    By João Cândido de Souza Neto in forum Macromedia Dynamic HTML
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: August 22nd, 09:45 AM
  5. <IFRAME>
    By jimPKP in forum Macromedia Dynamic HTML
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: August 30th, 05:49 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139