Ask a Question related to ASP.NET General, Design and Development.

  1. #1

    Default Re: Frames Vs. iFrame

    IFrame is only supported by internet explorer. It's great as long as no
    other browsers need access to your application.

    Sincerely,

    --
    S. Justin Gengo, MCP
    Web Developer

    Free code library at:
    [url]www.aboutfortunate.com[/url]

    "Out of chaos comes order."
    Nietzche


    "IntraRELY" <IntraRELY@yahoo.com> wrote in message
    news:%23UcmjTSXDHA.1888@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
    > I have used HTML frames in the pas for static HTML site. I am developing
    an
    > ASP.NET web application and I wanted to host the menu in a frame so the
    > client only downloads the content, not the menu which doesnt change. Is
    > iFrame the best method to accomplish this?
    >
    > TIA,
    >
    > Steve Wofford
    > [url]www.IntraRELY.com[/url]
    >
    >

    S. Justin Gengo Guest

  2. Similar Questions and Discussions

    1. iFrame
      Is there an easy way to create an iFrame in Dreamweaver MX?
    2. iframes or regular frames? Framesets or iframe?
      Hi, I built out my site like this: I've got one html page called 'main' with an iframe and the main naviagation. all of my other pages load...
    3. [JS] iFrame.
      God morning... I need to resize a iframe based in your content, but when a try it, i receive a error message Access Denied. Anybody know how...
    4. post to iframe
      Hi, Just wondering how (or if it's possible) to post from my page to another .asp page within an iframe? Hopefully that question make sense? I...
    5. <IFRAME>
      Hi all. I'm having to use <IFRAME> for a scrolling area for a client 'cos they don't want any Flash on the site. They want the scrollbar to be...
  3. #2

    Default Re: Frames Vs. iFrame

    Not true. Netscape works fine using IFrame. As a matter of fact combinations
    of User Controls and IFrames make for very efficient design.



    "George Durzi" <gdurzi@nospam_hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:eDJjHtSXDHA.1680@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
    > Have you thought of a User Control (ascx)?
    >
    > "S. Justin Gengo" <sjgengo@aboutfortunate.com> wrote in message
    > news:ex9A1bSXDHA.1640@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
    > > IFrame is only supported by internet explorer. It's great as long as no
    > > other browsers need access to your application.
    > >
    > > Sincerely,
    > >
    > > --
    > > S. Justin Gengo, MCP
    > > Web Developer
    > >
    > > Free code library at:
    > > [url]www.aboutfortunate.com[/url]
    > >
    > > "Out of chaos comes order."
    > > Nietzche
    > >
    > >
    > > "IntraRELY" <IntraRELY@yahoo.com> wrote in message
    > > news:%23UcmjTSXDHA.1888@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
    > > > I have used HTML frames in the pas for static HTML site. I am
    developing
    > > an
    > > > ASP.NET web application and I wanted to host the menu in a frame so
    the
    > > > client only downloads the content, not the menu which doesnt change.
    Is
    > > > iFrame the best method to accomplish this?
    > > >
    > > > TIA,
    > > >
    > > > Steve Wofford
    > > > [url]www.IntraRELY.com[/url]
    > > >
    > > >
    > >
    > >
    >
    >

    Seaside Guest

  4. #3

    Default Re: Frames Vs. iFrame

    Hi Steve

    Here a link about ASP.NET Menu
    <[url]http://www.asp.net/ControlGallery/ControlDetail.aspx?Control=124&tabindex=2[/url]
    >
    Hope this is helpful.

    Best regards,
    Lewis

    This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.


    --------------------
    | From: "IntraRELY" <IntraRELY@yahoo.com>
    | References: <#UcmjTSXDHA.1888@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl>
    <ex9A1bSXDHA.1640@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl>
    <eDJjHtSXDHA.1680@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl>
    <OgMJbxSXDHA.652@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl>
    <eKgmjDUXDHA.2204@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl>
    | Subject: Re: Frames Vs. iFrame
    | Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 17:29:57 -0700
    | Lines: 90
    | X-Priority: 3
    | X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    | X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
    | X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
    | Message-ID: <OViNBOUXDHA.2640@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl>
    | Newsgroups: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet
    | NNTP-Posting-Host: wsip-68-106-74-63.oc.oc.cox.net 68.106.74.63
    | Path: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTN GP09.phx.gbl
    | Xref: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet:165985
    | X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet
    |
    | Thanks for the input. User Controls are new to me. I tried the I frame for
    | my ASP.Net Menu and was a bad way to do it. As I stated the application
    will
    | consist of a Menu, that I want to look and function similar to
    | microsoft.com, however I dont want to reload the whole page, rather just
    the
    | conent. Unless someone can advise otherwise. The content will be datagrids
    | and forms. If there is anything you can add thanks.
    |
    | Steve Wofford
    | [url]www.IntraRELY.com[/url]
    |
    |
    | "Mikael Engdahl" <mikael-l@engdahl.no.spam.com> wrote in message
    | news:eKgmjDUXDHA.2204@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
    | > Not true. Iframes are bad because it totally breakes the
    | > semantics of the page, besides, they are deprecated in
    | > W3C standards.
    | >
    | > User Controls is no doubt the best solution here.
    | >
    | >
    | >
    | > Seaside wrote:
    | >
    | > > Not true. Netscape works fine using IFrame. As a matter of fact
    | combinations
    | > > of User Controls and IFrames make for very efficient design.
    | > >
    | > >
    | > >
    | > > "George Durzi" <gdurzi@nospam_hotmail.com> wrote in message
    | > > news:eDJjHtSXDHA.1680@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
    | > >
    | > >>Have you thought of a User Control (ascx)?
    | > >>
    | > >>"S. Justin Gengo" <sjgengo@aboutfortunate.com> wrote in message
    | > >>news:ex9A1bSXDHA.1640@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
    | > >>
    | > >>>IFrame is only supported by internet explorer. It's great as long as
    no
    | > >>>other browsers need access to your application.
    | > >>>
    | > >>>Sincerely,
    | > >>>
    | > >>>--
    | > >>>S. Justin Gengo, MCP
    | > >>>Web Developer
    | > >>>
    | > >>>Free code library at:
    | > >>>[url]www.aboutfortunate.com[/url]
    | > >>>
    | > >>>"Out of chaos comes order."
    | > >>> Nietzche
    | > >>>
    | > >>>
    | > >>>"IntraRELY" <IntraRELY@yahoo.com> wrote in message
    | > >>>news:%23UcmjTSXDHA.1888@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl. ..
    | > >>>
    | > >>>>I have used HTML frames in the pas for static HTML site. I am
    | > >
    | > > developing
    | > >
    | > >>>an
    | > >>>
    | > >>>>ASP.NET web application and I wanted to host the menu in a frame so
    | > >
    | > > the
    | > >
    | > >>>>client only downloads the content, not the menu which doesnt change.
    | > >
    | > > Is
    | > >
    | > >>>>iFrame the best method to accomplish this?
    | > >>>>
    | > >>>>TIA,
    | > >>>>
    | > >>>>Steve Wofford
    | > >>>>[url]www.IntraRELY.com[/url]
    | > >>>>
    | > >>>>
    | > >>>
    | > >>>
    | > >>
    | > >
    | > >
    | >
    | >
    | > --
    | > Mikael Engdahl
    | >
    |
    |
    |

    Lewis Wang [MSFT] Guest

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139