Ask a Question related to FileMaker, Design and Development.
-
Coby Beck #1
hiding <no access> records
Hi,
I have used Groups, Access, and Passwords to hide some records from some
users based on a field value. However, when I open a layout as a particular
user I am faced with a slew of <no access> values for records that fail the
test. I would like just to have these records appear to be non-existent.
ie Joe the cow farmer should log in and see only cattle in the liveslock
layout, even when he searches for sheep.
What is the usual way to accomplish this surely standard task?
TIA
--
Coby Beck
(remove #\Space "coby 101 @ big pond . com")
Coby Beck Guest
-
random records from Access?
Hi I'm using a Windows 2003 server an access database, with ODBC connection Is there anywhere I can find info about displaying all records in... -
Updating Access 2000 Records in .NET
Hi, I need some help. I have a on button click event that goes through a survey and reads the items they choose and then updates the current... -
Hiding records
I know that you can OMIT records temporarily. But they pop back in as soon as you SHOW ALL RECORDS or run a script that does so. Is there a way... -
Access 97 listbox limited to 64k records.
Andrew If you're stuffing that much data into a listbox, have you considered making a subform/continuous form? -- Rob ... -
Hiding Access Forms
Does anyone know of a method for hiding a form in mdb that cannot be unhiden. I need to execute certain checks and set various setting after a... -
Marcel #2
Re: hiding <no access> records
Hi Coby,
Yes, I encountered the same. I still use groups, access privilliges and
password but I also introduced a group field in every table if necessary and
use group relations to perform always a GotoRelatedRecord[] from scripts or
buttons. In this way I hide other records for other users that doesn't
belong to the group. And if a user might fall back into all records there is
always <no access>.
I must say I find it heavy stuff in the beginning but as the project makes
progress and the concept becomes clear its easy.
Marcel
"Coby Beck" <cbeck@mercury.bc.ca> schreef in bericht
news:bf7sjc$2sbf$1@otis.netspace.net.au...particular> Hi,
>
> I have used Groups, Access, and Passwords to hide some records from some
> users based on a field value. However, when I open a layout as athe> user I am faced with a slew of <no access> values for records that fail> test. I would like just to have these records appear to be non-existent.
> ie Joe the cow farmer should log in and see only cattle in the liveslock
> layout, even when he searches for sheep.
>
> What is the usual way to accomplish this surely standard task?
>
> TIA
>
> --
> Coby Beck
> (remove #\Space "coby 101 @ big pond . com")
>
>
Marcel Guest
-
Coby Beck #3
Re: hiding <no access> records
"Marcel" <m.kollenaar@slo.nl> wrote in message
news:bf8gbl$c65mn$1@ID-34238.news.uni-berlin.de...and> Hi Coby,
>
> Yes, I encountered the same. I still use groups, access privilliges and
> password but I also introduced a group field in every table if necessaryor> use group relations to perform always a GotoRelatedRecord[] from scriptsis> buttons. In this way I hide other records for other users that doesn't
> belong to the group. And if a user might fall back into all records thereCould you expand on this a bit? I take it from the lack of other responses> always <no access>.
>
> I must say I find it heavy stuff in the beginning but as the project makes
> progress and the concept becomes clear its easy.
that I definitely need a bit more elbow grease to accomplish this task...
I already have a division code in every table containing information I want
selectively displayed. So here is my plan (probably executed by any
non-newbie as fast as I can describe it..)
- Use scripts in the menu to open layouts rather than have
layouts directly available
- Use a function to match Status(CurrentLogin) to the proper
division code
- Each script will use PerformFind on the Code field to limit
the data in the found set.
- the <no access> will be a heavy handed last defense.
Is there a way to catch any user searches and further constrain the found
set?
Is the above a reasonable plan?
--
Coby Beck
(remove #\Space "coby 101 @ big pond . com")
non-existent.> "Coby Beck" <cbeck@mercury.bc.ca> schreef in bericht
> news:bf7sjc$2sbf$1@otis.netspace.net.au...> particular> > Hi,
> >
> > I have used Groups, Access, and Passwords to hide some records from some
> > users based on a field value. However, when I open a layout as a> the> > user I am faced with a slew of <no access> values for records that fail> > test. I would like just to have these records appear to be>> > ie Joe the cow farmer should log in and see only cattle in the liveslock
> > layout, even when he searches for sheep.
> >
> > What is the usual way to accomplish this surely standard task?
> >
> > TIA
> >
> > --
> > Coby Beck
> > (remove #\Space "coby 101 @ big pond . com")
> >
> >
>
Coby Beck Guest
-
Unregistered #4
hiding <no access> records
If you want to just hide the words "no access", conditional format of
not IsValid(Self)
and match to background color will do the trick.Unregistered Guest



Reply With Quote

