Ask a Question related to FreeBSD, Design and Development.
-
Chris Knipe #1
high latency
Hi,
I have 4 FreeBSD Servers connected to a Cisco 2950 all doing inter-VLAN
routing. Everything is working right, but one server is getting absurdly
high latency through the VLANs.
problem box:
root@wsmd-core01:/home/cknipe# ping 198.19.0.1
PING 198.19.0.1 (198.19.0.1): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 198.19.0.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=1020.571 ms
64 bytes from 198.19.0.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=1114.468 ms
64 bytes from 198.19.0.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=934.580 ms
64 bytes from 198.19.0.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=814.296 ms
64 bytes from 198.19.0.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=682.657 ms
64 bytes from 198.19.0.1: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=1173.596 ms
64 bytes from 198.19.0.1: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=1212.085 ms
64 bytes from 198.19.0.1: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=1021.996 ms
64 bytes from 198.19.0.1: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=826.783 ms
64 bytes from 198.19.0.1: icmp_seq=10 ttl=64 time=372.565 ms
^C
--- 198.19.0.1 ping statistics ---
12 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 16% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 372.565/917.360/1212.085/241.657 ms
second box:
root@efanious:~# ping 198.19.0.1
PING 198.19.0.1 (198.19.0.1): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 198.19.0.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=1.847 ms
64 bytes from 198.19.0.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=1.484 ms
64 bytes from 198.19.0.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=1.478 ms
64 bytes from 198.19.0.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=1.564 ms
64 bytes from 198.19.0.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=1.913 ms
64 bytes from 198.19.0.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=3.057 ms
64 bytes from 198.19.0.1: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=1.839 ms
64 bytes from 198.19.0.1: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=1.526 ms
64 bytes from 198.19.0.1: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=2.791 ms
64 bytes from 198.19.0.1: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=1.522 ms
^C
--- 198.19.0.1 ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 1.478/1.902/3.057/0.537 ms
The other's ping basically the same (1.4ms -> 4ms).
Now, the problematic box is running a RealTek card, netstat -bin reports no
input / output errors. The interface on the Cisco 2950 also doesn't report
any problems or errors on the interface. Does anyone have some
recommendations? I'm thinking of just switching the NIC out, but I'd rather
want to make sure first that is actually the problem.
--
Chris.
Chris Knipe Guest
-
Latency problems
I am having one problem with my online FMS application (card game). When I access it with one internet provider it works great, latency 20ms, but... -
Ping latency and FMS
Yes... heavy latency will slow your streams down. I would guess that the problem has to do with the network, rather than the server(s). Can you... -
Reducing Live Latency?
Does anyone have any good strategies on reducing the latency of live broadcasts? For example, if I have 2 video conference windows going, whats the... -
High run queue, high idle cpu percentage
Hey - I have a werid situation: vmstat shows high r (always r>0, sometimes r>10), but id > 90%. The rest of the values are nominal. Any... -
high latency in dial up circuits
I am getting high latency on my dialup to ISP while using internal toshiba software modem.about 250 ms. However when I used external modem of DLINK... -
Peter Risdon #2
Re: high latency
On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 11:52 +0200, Chris Knipe wrote:
[...]> Hi,
>
> I have 4 FreeBSD Servers connected to a Cisco 2950 all doing inter-VLAN
> routing. Everything is working right, but one server is getting absurdly
> high latency through the VLANs.
Ugh. You don't say which one, but I just cured a prob with nfs by> Now, the problematic box is running a RealTek card,
replacing a brand new Realtek card with an old digital NIC that was
lying around. Not for the first time, I vow never to use Realtek cards
again.
Peter.
Peter Risdon Guest
-
Chris Knipe #3
Re: Re: high latency
>> Hi,
Yup. Switched the card and problem solved. I use RealTek mainly because I>>>
>> I have 4 FreeBSD Servers connected to a Cisco 2950 all doing inter-VLAN
>> routing. Everything is working right, but one server is getting absurdly
>> high latency through the VLANs.
> [...]
>>>> Now, the problematic box is running a RealTek card,
> Ugh. You don't say which one, but I just cured a prob with nfs by
> replacing a brand new Realtek card with an old digital NIC that was
> lying around. Not for the first time, I vow never to use Realtek cards
> again.
have heard that they have the best support for VLANs with large packets
inside those VLANs.
Oh well, we'll be running only cisco on the networking side pretty soon,
then there wont be a use for VLANs on the servers :)
Thanks
--
chris.
Chris Knipe Guest
-
Ted Mittelstaedt #4
RE: high latency
Realteks seem to have a problem detecting and setting up for the correct> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email]owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org[/email]
> [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Peter Risdon
> Sent: Monday, February 21, 2005 3:31 AM
> To: Chris Knipe
> Cc: [email]freebsd-questions@freebsd.org[/email]
> Subject: Re: high latency
>
>
> On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 11:52 +0200, Chris Knipe wrote:> inter-VLAN> > Hi,
> >
> > I have 4 FreeBSD Servers connected to a Cisco 2950 all doing> getting absurdly> > routing. Everything is working right, but one server is>> > high latency through the VLANs.
> [...]
>>> > Now, the problematic box is running a RealTek card,
> Ugh. You don't say which one, but I just cured a prob with nfs by
> replacing a brand new Realtek card with an old digital NIC that was
> lying around. Not for the first time, I vow never to use Realtek cards
> again.
>
speed/duplex. (The 10/100 versions, that is) If you leave them in AUTO
negotiation mode they only work right if connected to a 10/100 switch.
Otherwise if you have problems they work fine if you hard code the
speed/duplex in the /etc/rc.conf file.
Ted
Ted Mittelstaedt Guest
-
Peter Risdon #5
RE: high latency
On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 03:48 -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
I still feel an aversion to the rl cards, but thanks very much for the>> >
> > On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 11:52 +0200, Chris Knipe wrote:> > inter-VLAN> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have 4 FreeBSD Servers connected to a Cisco 2950 all doing> > getting absurdly> > > routing. Everything is working right, but one server is> >> > > high latency through the VLANs.
> > [...]
> >> >> > > Now, the problematic box is running a RealTek card,
> > Ugh. You don't say which one, but I just cured a prob with nfs by
> > replacing a brand new Realtek card with an old digital NIC that was
> > lying around. Not for the first time, I vow never to use Realtek cards
> > again.
> >
> Realteks seem to have a problem detecting and setting up for the correct
> speed/duplex. (The 10/100 versions, that is) If you leave them in AUTO
> negotiation mode they only work right if connected to a 10/100 switch.
> Otherwise if you have problems they work fine if you hard code the
> speed/duplex in the /etc/rc.conf file.
tip.
Peter.
Peter Risdon Guest
-
Skylar Thompson #6
Re: high latency
Peter Risdon wrote:
Not for naught is this comment in the source for the FreeBSD driver:>On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 11:52 +0200, Chris Knipe wrote:
>
>>>>Hi,
>>
>>I have 4 FreeBSD Servers connected to a Cisco 2950 all doing inter-VLAN
>>routing. Everything is working right, but one server is getting absurdly
>>high latency through the VLANs.
>>
>>
>[...]
>
>
>>>>Now, the problematic box is running a RealTek card,
>>
>>
>Ugh. You don't say which one, but I just cured a prob with nfs by
>replacing a brand new Realtek card with an old digital NIC that was
>lying around. Not for the first time, I vow never to use Realtek cards
>again.
>
>
The RealTek 8139 PCI NIC redefines the meaning of 'low end.'
I've had nothing but bad luck from them.
--
-- Skylar Thompson (skylar@cs.earlham.edu)
-- [url]http://www.cs.earlham.edu/~skylar/[/url]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - [url]http://enigmail.mozdev.org[/url]
iD8DBQFCGn6zsc4yyULgN4YRArN9AJsFupryxDA5PzW2eotPEz sgKO0zLACgqg2Y
zCMOG/104i+Ao+dyeIdxnWo=
=Tx41
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Skylar Thompson Guest



Reply With Quote

