include" file" vs. "virtual" in .asp

[eb-go]

what is the diff between "virtual" and "file" when using include script?
and or should i be using "asp include" if an asp page vs. "script include"?

(dreamweaver mx)

[Murray *TMM*]

[url]http://www.bignosebird.com/sdocs/include.shtml[/url]

HTML includes work fine, provided your host has enabled them.

--
Murray --- ICQ 71997575
Team Macromedia Volunteer for Dreamweaver
(If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
==================
[url]http://www.dreamweavermx-templates.com[/url] - Template Triage!
[url]http://www.projectseven.com/go[/url] - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
[url]http://www.dwfaq.com[/url] - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
[url]http://www.macromedia.com/support/search/[/url] - Macromedia (MM) Technotes
==================

"eb-go" <webforumsuser@macromedia.com> wrote in message
news:di1bhp$ooa$1@forums.macromedia.com...

> what is the diff between "virtual" and "file" when using include script?
> and or should i be using "asp include" if an asp page vs. "script
> include"?
>
> (dreamweaver mx)
>
>
>
>

[eb-go]

yeah, but which one, virtual or file and why for which?
thanks.
e