Is Contribute CS3 Right?

[CJXJ]

We have a subscriber newsletter produced in PDF form. The package has Acrobat
8.0 Pro elements, including available security settings. Since the file opens
in Reader or Acrobat, the end user can save it and distribute for free. To
stop this, we're considering Contribute CS3 as a means for embedding the PDF
material in HTML at the Website. These questions pertain to security that
Contribute might provide:

1) Will the document still open as a PDF in Reader or Acrobat (thus able to
save as a file)?

2) If embedded as HTML, is this a one-page entry and URL for the full document
(14 PDF pages)?

3) If on one URL/page, is the image quality anywhere near that of the PDF
opened in Reader or Acrobat?

4) If on one page, does the scrolling down function look as good as PDF? If
screen zoom is employed, does the image quality look fairly much like the PDF
resolution?

4) Would the screen print function provide only a low-resolution HTML type of
printout?

5) All of this is to prevent the end user from saving a PDF to the hard or
storage drive. Is there a simpler solution in Acrobat 8.0 Pro? (Hiding the
Reader/Acrobat tool bar is not a thorough solution.) We really like the
graphic impact of PDF rendering, however, we cannot afford to lose the material
through end user saves and mass pass-through.

Thanks for your assistance, we truly appreciate tried answers...More than
willing to invest in Contribute CS3 if that is the best solution...

[ThinkInk]

Why don't you download the trial and try it out for yourself...?