Jpeg size bug in ID 4.0.3?

Ask a Question related to Adobe Indesign Macintosh, Design and Development.

  1. #1

    Default Re: Jpeg size bug in ID 4.0.3?



    This new behavior is a very real problem




    I still haven't understood what the problem actually is.

    InDesign has two strategies to keep your file small. Don't tell me you do not like that.
    Whichever strategy is chosen you get a correct status report. InDesign does not show you the resolution of the file on your harddisk but the information about the *placed* instance is correct.

    What is it that you want or need?
    Every image in 72ppi?
    What on earth for (this is just curiosity)?
    What is supposed to happen to these images that cannot be done with the current state of affairs?
    Gerald_Singelmann@adobeforums.com Guest

  2. Similar Questions and Discussions

    1. JPEG, PNG and Webpage Size
      I recently upgraded from Publisher 2000 to Publisher 2003. When I updated my webpages it converted by JPEGs to PNGs which created file sizes about...
    2. jpeg to pdf size problems
      Hi and thanks to anyone who can help in advance. I'm trying to convert a 8.5 x 14 jpeg into pdf since that's what most local shops need to...
    3. Jpeg size parms
      Is there a nice way in actionscript to detect the size of a jpeg loaded into a movie clip? I need to be able to dynamically load thumbnails and then...
    4. jpeg size
      For web use (mod_ruby), I need a ruby script which can read gif and jpeg images and give me their pixel size (x,y). No other image processing...
    5. how to get the size of a jpeg image ?
      How can I get the height and width of a jpeg image ? Thank you for help me. Emmanuel
  3. #2

    Default Re: Jpeg size bug in ID 4.0.3?

    You need an extra Jpeg charge john, the baindead would then fix the files knowing it will cost them extra.

    $10 for every placed jpeg.
    Buko@adobeforums.com Guest

  4. #3

    Default Re: Jpeg size bug in ID 4.0.3?

    I have been thinking about suggesting this, but my company tends to accept just about anything without complaint on the basis of the competitiveness of the market and blah blah blah.

    I need to do some more testing on this issue.

    A lot of the problem I alluded to has to do with designers using older software, and maybe even opening digital camera shots in PS6 or earlier (which opens @72ppi) then saving out of PS still as Jpeg @72ppi and placing that.

    And I have questions about exif size tags in the metadata of digital camera shots:

    I presume older cameras did not do this, so that could be a factor if designers are being given pics from older cameras and are just placing them in ID.

    Photoshop started reading the size tag in v7, correct?

    ID started reading the tag in CS2?

    Opening in PS and saving as a jpeg locks the resolution of the file, and if the rez is different than the rez in the metadata, Photoshop's rez will prevail.

    A job I just worked on had a bunch of jpeg but most with user defined file names so I'm thinking that they were in the saved out of Photoshop variety in v6 or earlier. That based on the fact that they opened in PSCS2 @72ppi.

    I really should ask what versions the customer used, and how the jpegs came into being.
    John_Slate@adobeforums.com Guest

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139