Keeping up to date with patches

Ask a Question related to Sun Solaris, Design and Development.

  1. #1

    Default Keeping up to date with patches

    Hi all,

    I have a couple of quick questions in order to clarify my thoughts on
    Sun security and bug-fix patches.

    Firstly, am I right in thinking that if I installed a fresh Solaris
    system, and then applied the current "Recommended" patch cluster, I
    would be up-to-date on all currently known security patches ? IE:-
    does the cluster get updated when a new security patch or critical
    bug-fix is released ?

    Secondly, what mailing list provides notification of new
    security/bug-fix patches being released when they happen ? I subscribe
    to the patch club report which comes out once a week, but I'd like to
    get this information as soon as possible. I have subscribed to the
    "security-alert@sun.com" list which provides "security bulletins" -
    however, checking sunsolve for security bulletins reveals a somewhat
    short list of articles, the last one being released in 2002 (Bulletin
    #00220).

    On the same SunSolve site, there are separate "Security Alerts" (the
    difference between a 'bulletin' and an 'alert' doesn't seem to be
    defined anywhere...), which appear to be what I am interested in - but
    I can only find a way to subscribe to this on a weekly basis. Is there
    something else I have overlooked ?

    Thanks in advance,

    -Mark
    Mark Round Guest

  2. Similar Questions and Discussions

    1. Patches for MX 7?
      Have any patches been released yet for MX 7?
    2. Method for keeping SSH up to date?
      Hi all, I am responsible for 13+ Solaris servers, some running 8 and some running 9. What is the best way to keep Open SSH up to date? I need...
    3. patches
      Hi All, Say i give one of my application to a customer. The customer runs it and finds a bug in there. I don't want to give a fixed application...
    4. XP Patches and more...
      From all the patches, updates and whatnote, how can any one determine which one is essential and which one is not. I just installed XP and visited...
    5. AIX patches
      On Sun, 29 Dec 2002 15:56:22 +0200, "Pons" <pons@gmx.li> wrote: Please read the installation docs. You need to read them anyway. Sybrand...
  3. #2

    Default Re: Keeping up to date with patches

    Mark Round wrote:
    >
    >Firstly, am I right in thinking that if I installed a fresh Solaris
    >system, and then applied the current "Recommended" patch cluster, I
    >would be up-to-date on all currently known security patches ? IE:-
    >
    >
    I do not think so. I would expect , cluster are always a little bit
    delayed. Single patches can be made available faster , just to solve
    urgent problem. It is not only common sense. It is confirmed by my
    recent experience. Patching with cluster did not solve one of my
    problems. After applying cluster, then all other recommended and
    security patches the application I was interested in began to work. Most
    of the extra patches were already applied by the cluster but some of
    them not.

    Andrzej

    Andrzej Popielewicz Guest

  4. #3

    Default Re: Keeping up to date with patches

    > After applying cluster, then all other recommended and
    > security patches the application I was interested in began to work. Most
    > of the extra patches were already applied by the cluster but some of
    > them not.
    Thanks for the advice. Where would I find a list of all recommended
    and security patches for a given Solaris release ? I know about the
    "Recommended and security" cluster, I take it this is not what you
    mean... Basically, if I install this cluster, how can I find out what
    security patches or bug fixes I may be missing ?

    Thanks,

    -Mark
    Mark Round Guest

  5. #4

    Default Re: Keeping up to date with patches

    Uz.ytkownik Mark Round napisa?:
    > I take it this is not what you
    > mean... Basically, if I install this cluster, how can I find out what
    > security patches or bug fixes I may be missing ?
    >
    > Thanks,
    >
    > -Mark
    Go to
    [url]http://www.sun.com/software/download[/url]
    and
    choose patches .
    You will be presented with list of recommended patches on the right
    hand side. At the moment , there are three categories of them.
    I have meant the first two.

    Andrzej

    Andrzej Popielewicz Guest

  6. #5

    Default Re: Keeping up to date with patches

    [email]mark.round7@ntlworld.com[/email] (Mark Round) writes in comp.unix.solaris:
    |Thanks for the advice. Where would I find a list of all recommended
    |and security patches for a given Solaris release ? I know about the
    |"Recommended and security" cluster, I take it this is not what you
    |mean... Basically, if I install this cluster, how can I find out what
    |security patches or bug fixes I may be missing ?

    PatchPro or patchdiag can check and report for you.
    [url]http://sunsolve.sun.com/pub-cgi/show.pl?target=patchpage[/url]

    --
    __________________________________________________ ______________________
    Alan Coopersmith [email]alanc@alum.calberkeley.org[/email]
    [url]http://www.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU/~alanc/[/url] aka: [email]Alan.Coopersmith@Sun.COM[/email]
    Working for, but definitely not speaking for, Sun Microsystems, Inc.
    Alan Coopersmith Guest

  7. #6

    Default Re: Keeping up to date with patches

    Alan Coopersmith <alanc@alum.calberkeley.org> wrote:
    > [email]mark.round7@ntlworld.com[/email] (Mark Round) writes in comp.unix.solaris:
    > |mean... Basically, if I install this cluster, how can I find out what
    > |security patches or bug fixes I may be missing ?
    >
    > PatchPro or patchdiag can check and report for you.
    > [url]http://sunsolve.sun.com/pub-cgi/show.pl?target=patchpage[/url]
    A good time to bring up the previously discussed issue about the
    deficiency of Sun's scheme of marking patches as "Recommended" (R)
    and "Security" (S) again. One should be aware that it's always
    patches being marked as R and/or S, not patch revisions, as it should
    be. When e.g. patch 123456-10 is marked "S" this does not tell you
    if fixes for security problems were in rev. 10, or 01, or 01 and 10.
    If you have 123456-05 installed, it would be vital to know if security
    fixes came in after this revision. Once a patch revision is marked
    "S" it's your best bet to keep up with all newer revisions of such
    patches.

    patchcheck (haven't tried the other tools recently) in the above case
    would not show 123456-10 in its "UNINSTALLED RECOMMENDED PATCHES" or
    "UNINSTALLED SECURITY PATCHES" section. It hides it in the list of
    "INSTALLED PATCHES" under a heap of other, non-R/S patches. I've
    modified patchk.pl to add a R/S/* column to the list of "INSTALLED
    PATCHES", so I can identify them more easily.

    Still, the real problem is that the patch database obviously just
    doesn't contain the R/S marks on certain revisions. I'd really like
    to see that added.

    mp.
    --
    Martin Paul | Systems Administrator
    Institute for Software Science | [email]martin@par.univie.ac.at[/email]
    University of Vienna, Austria | [url]http://www.par.univie.ac.at/[/url]
    Martin Paul Guest

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139