Little survey for Unix users

[Steve Hémond]

I'm not willing to start a religious war, but, what is your prefered editor
for works such as Perl programming? (Vi(m) or Emacs?)

[Tad McClellan]

Steve Hémond <shemond@hotmail.com> wrote:

> what is your prefered editor
> for works such as Perl programming? (Vi(m) or Emacs?)

Yes.


--
Tad McClellan SGML consulting
[email]tadmc@augustmail.com[/email] Perl programming
Fort Worth, Texas

[David H. Adler]

In article <slrnbml6hi.efm.tadmc@magna.augustmail.com>, Tad McClellan wrote:

> Steve Hémond <shemond@hotmail.com> wrote:
>

>> what is your prefered editor
>> for works such as Perl programming? (Vi(m) or Emacs?)

>
>
> Yes.

First of all, I'm with Tad on this one.

Secondly, this isn't on topic.

Let's not start yet another huge thread on preferred editors, ok?

Thanks

dha

--
David H. Adler - <dha@panix.com> - [url]http://www.panix.com/~dha/[/url]
Although, of course, it will be $ME in line with the usual practice of
SHOUTING OUT MAGIC VARIABLES. - Damian Conway

[Abigail]

Steve Hémond (shemond@hotmail.com) wrote on MMMDCLXX September MCMXCIII
in <URL:news:_muab.9341$hF3.1237617@news20.bellglobal .com>:
-- I'm not willing to start a religious war, but, what is your prefered editor
-- for works such as Perl programming? (Vi(m) or Emacs?)


Real (wo)men use 'cat'. Wussies use 'ed'. Vi and Emacs are for poofs.



Abigail
--
perl -wle 'print prototype sub "Just another Perl Hacker" {};'

[Tom]

xemacs

"Tad McClellan" <tadmc@augustmail.com> wrote in message
news:slrnbml6hi.efm.tadmc@magna.augustmail.com...

> Steve Hémond <shemond@hotmail.com> wrote:
>

> > what is your prefered editor
> > for works such as Perl programming? (Vi(m) or Emacs?)

>
>
> Yes.
>
>
> --
> Tad McClellan SGML consulting
> [email]tadmc@augustmail.com[/email] Perl programming
> Fort Worth, Texas

[Steve Hémond]

David H. Adler wrote:

> In article <slrnbml6hi.efm.tadmc@magna.augustmail.com>, Tad McClellan
> wrote:

>> Steve Hémond <shemond@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>

>>> what is your prefered editor
>>> for works such as Perl programming? (Vi(m) or Emacs?)

>>
>>
>> Yes.

>
> First of all, I'm with Tad on this one.
>
> Secondly, this isn't on topic.
>
> Let's not start yet another huge thread on preferred editors, ok?
>
> Thanks
>
> dha
>

lol, that's what I thought, sorry!! :-)

[Alan J. Flavell]

On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Steve Hémond wrote:

> I'm not willing to start a religious war

That's nice, 'cause I'm not willing to participate in one.

Anyway, I'm kind'a allergic to the word "survey" in a Subject line.

[Terry L. Ridder]

Steve Hémond wrote:

> I'm not willing to start a religious war, but, what is your prefered editor
> for works such as Perl programming? (Vi(m) or Emacs?)
>
>

.:\:/:.
+-------------------+ .:\:\:/:/:.
| PLEASE DO NOT | :.:\:\:/:/:.:
| FEED THE TROLLS | :=.' - - '.=:
| | '=(\ 9 9 /)='
| Thank you, | ( (_) )
| Management | /`-vvv-'\
+-------------------+ / \
| | @@@ / /|,,,,,|\ \
| | @@@ /_// /^\ \\_\
@x@@x@ | | |/ WW( ( ) )WW
\||||/ | | \| __\,,\ /,,/__
\||/ | | | jgs (______Y______)
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\//\/\\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\


--
terry l. ridder ><>
postmaster at blauedonau.com

[Chris Marshall]

Abigail <abigail@abigail.nl> wrote in message news:<slrnbmlaea.esh.abigail@alexandra.abigail.nl> ...

> Steve Hémond (shemond@hotmail.com) wrote on MMMDCLXX September MCMXCIII
> in <URL:news:_muab.9341$hF3.1237617@news20.bellglobal .com>:
> -- I'm not willing to start a religious war, but, what is your prefered editor
> -- for works such as Perl programming? (Vi(m) or Emacs?)
>
>
> Real (wo)men use 'cat'. Wussies use 'ed'. Vi and Emacs are for poofs.
>
>
>

Reminds me of a userfriendly strip:
[url]http://ars.userfriendly.org/cartoons/?id=19990508[/url]

[Eric Schwartz]

[email]tadmc@augustmail.com[/email] (Tad McClellan) writes:

> Steve Hémond <shemond@hotmail.com> wrote:

>> what is your prefered editor
>> for works such as Perl programming? (Vi(m) or Emacs?)

>
> Yes.

Only sometimes.

-=Eric (ed is the STANDARD EDITOR!!!!!)
--
Come to think of it, there are already a million monkeys on a million
typewriters, and Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare.
-- Blair Houghton.

[Eric Schwartz]

Abigail <abigail@abigail.nl> writes:

> Real (wo)men use 'cat'. Wussies use 'ed'. Vi and Emacs are for poofs.

Luuuxury! Real (Wo)Men use 'dd'. l4m3rz use 'cat'. The rest
continues as you say.

-=Eric
--
Come to think of it, there are already a million monkeys on a million
typewriters, and Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare.
-- Blair Houghton.

[Alan J. Flavell]

On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, Eric Schwartz wrote:

> -=Eric (ed is the STANDARD EDITOR!!!!!)

We have a user who still uses EDT, or rather, an emulation of EDT in
vi which he got from somewhere to ease the transition from VAX/VMS to
Ultrix, and that was about 2 OSes back. Which only goes to prove the
point that editors are a very personal thing and not worth
flamefesting over.

ttfn