Mapping a folder or drive

Ask a Question related to Windows Networking, Design and Development.

  1. #1

    Default Mapping a folder or drive

    I mapped a folder from one PC to the other on a two PC
    network. The folder contains 12,000 photo files. It
    takes less than a second to load on the PC the folder is
    on. But it takes 40 to 50 seconds to load from the other
    PC on the network. This can't be right. Both PC's are
    using Win-XP. The first has a 1.8 ghrz processor and
    512mb memory. The linked PC has a 2.2 ghrz processor and
    256 mb memory. Why is it taking so long to load on the
    other PC. What's rong.
    Donne Lail Guest

  2. Similar Questions and Discussions

    1. Mapping wwwroot to another drive for testing
      Am I correct in understanding that there is no way to map the C:\CFusionMX7\wwwroot folder to another folder, such as d:\clients\web for testing...
    2. Mapping a folder as a network drive
      Hi Facing this problem when I am trying to map a drive to to one of my local folders in one of the partitions, Whereas I am able to do this as...
    3. Mapping a Network Drive
      Im using a VPN connection. I have verfied that the VPN is connecting to the server. I then proceed to map a drive. The mapping seems to work...
    4. Mapping networked shared folder to local folder
      Hello. I am setting-up a "cad server" (basically a shared folder located, \\cad\eoi\) for my draftspeople. The problem lies within the cad...
    5. mapping network drive
      For some reason only with Win XP computers windows cannot reconnect a mapped drive at login. I am running a wireless network with 15 comps...
  3. #2

    Default Re: Mapping a folder or drive

    Donne Lail wrote:
    > I mapped a folder from one PC to the other on a two PC
    > network. The folder contains 12,000 photo files. It
    > takes less than a second to load on the PC the folder is
    > on. But it takes 40 to 50 seconds to load from the other
    > PC on the network. This can't be right. Both PC's are
    > using Win-XP. The first has a 1.8 ghrz processor and
    > 512mb memory. The linked PC has a 2.2 ghrz processor and
    > 256 mb memory. Why is it taking so long to load on the
    > other PC. What's rong.
    Your network connection to a remote HD is much slower than
    than your direct connection to a local HD. That is normal.

    There is room for improvement in M$'s implementation of network
    protocols, but some difference between local- and remote-access
    will always be there. In you case, the inherent difference is
    multiplied by 12,000,

    If you want to spend money and/or time on reducing the
    remote-access time, then you may try these:

    1. Replace the 10/100 Mb/s NICs with GbE NICs, and replace your
    10/100 Mb/s hub/switch/router with a GbE switch/router.

    2. Replace the commodity 10/100 Mb/s NICs with some that are
    optimized for performance instead of optimized for cost.
    Look for NICs that are designed for servers, although that
    designation does not always mean much.

    3. You aren't really using a hub, are you? Gag.

    4. Make sure you are getting FDX and 100 Mb/s on your NICs.
    Sometimes, auto-select doesn't work.

    5. Check and experiment with network params, including MTU and
    RWIN. Tuning can make a big difference. For starters, look
    for DrTCP.exe on the web.

    6. If all else fails, lower your expectations; you are, after all,
    running commodity software on commodity hardware, with (I assume)
    amateur network management.
    --
    Cheers, Bob

    Bob Willard Guest

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139