Massive layoffs projected

[James smyth]

"The good news is that they're back to being sort of break even," Lehman's Niles
said, but he questioned whether Sun's revenues were enough to support its
35,000-strong employee base. "At a certain point, break even isn't going to cut
it. You need to either get the profitability up so you can support your employee
base or you need to go through further restructuring," he said.

[url]http://www.bio-itworld.com/news/072303_report2954.html[/url]

[Woody]

"James smyth" <starlink101@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:R6lXa.2027$gN2.21049463@news-text.cableinet.net...

> "The good news is that they're back to being sort of break even," Lehman's

Niles

> said, but he questioned whether Sun's revenues were enough to support its
> 35,000-strong employee base. "At a certain point, break even isn't going

to cut

> it. You need to either get the profitability up so you can support your

employee

> base or you need to go through further restructuring," he said.

And you think lots of people losing their jobs is a good thing to help your
advocacy? lets hope it happens to you if you when you leave school
Woody

[Chris Mattern]

CJT wrote:

> James smyth wrote:
>

>> "The good news is that they're back to being sort of break even,"
>> Lehman's Niles
>> said, but he questioned whether Sun's revenues were enough to support its
>> 35,000-strong employee base. "At a certain point, break even isn't
>> going to cut
>> it. You need to either get the profitability up so you can support
>> your employee
>> base or you need to go through further restructuring," he said.
>>
>> [url]http://www.bio-itworld.com/news/072303_report2954.html[/url]
>>

>
> Your subject line doesn't match what the article says.
>

Indeed. A subject line of "Massive profit increases projected"
would've been every bit as accurate.

Chris Mattern