I have not done any NS checking with 2003 yet.
But with each release it does get harder to support NS.

I did do testing of the master page(s) in web sites in 2003. As with version
2002 I recommend "against" the use of a master page in web sites. Master
page is meant for print docs not web docs, the input I've had from MS does
not dispute that.

--
David Bartosik - Microsoft MVP
Visit [url]www.davidbartosik.com[/url]
for Publisher and Web Design
Tips and How-to's.

"edb" <edb@ejbell.com> wrote in message
news:040e01c34bda$63d9fcd0$a301280a@phx.gbl...
> David, thanks for helping us all out. Your comments and
> website are great.
>
> My site, [url]www.arpc.com[/url], uses a Master Page for some common
> graphics, but it chokes in NS 7.1. Is it better to have
> the graphics on every page. Also, what else can I do to
> simplify the site so there are fewer compatibility
> issues? Should I revert back and publish it with Pub
> 2002?