Ask a Question related to Windows Vista, Design and Development.

  1. #1

    Default MDAC > 2.6

    I have an application that insists on running with MDAC 2.7 or better. I've
    tried the MDAC kits for 2.7, 2.8 and 2.8 SP1 and none seem to successfully
    install. Any recommendations?

    bri

    bri Guest

  2. Similar Questions and Discussions

    1. MDAC Version
      Does anyone happen to know what the MDAC version is that comes installed with the new Vista OS build? Service Pack 2 for XP came with version 2.81...
    2. MDAC 2.8 Access & ASP
      Hi All, I have one serious problem... I have a windows 2000 server, with IIS 5.0, dot net framework 1.1 installed. I have a few classic asp...
    3. ADO (MDAC) issue
      I have a problem lies with a meta tag. Below is my code: <!--METADATA TYPE="TypeLib" NAME="Microsoft ActiveX Data Objects 2.5 Library"...
    4. proper installation of asp.net and mdac
      I'm transitioning into asp.net developmnent and need to properly install asp.net and mdac... IIS is already installed on a server on the network....
    5. Strange security issue on XP Pro with MDAC 2.7
      Hi All, I have a very strange experience on subject after some desperate testing conditions. Firstly, the environment is as follows: XP Pro...
  3. #2

    Default Re: MDAC > 2.6

    Beta is a Beta

    --
    Peter

    Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
    Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.

    "bri" <BBOSTWIC@OMICRON.COM> wrote in message news:B3758B9B-D744-4936-9D9D-D250DD1E6F8C@microsoft.com...
    >I have an application that insists on running with MDAC 2.7 or better. I've
    > tried the MDAC kits for 2.7, 2.8 and 2.8 SP1 and none seem to successfully
    > install. Any recommendations?
    >
    > bri
    >
    Peter Foldes Guest

  4. #3

    Default Re: MDAC > 2.6

    Certainly is ;o)

    --
    Zack Whittaker
    Microsoft Beta (Windows Server R2 Beta Mentor)
    » ZackNET Enterprises: [url]www.zacknet.co.uk[/url]
    » MSBlog on ResDev: [url]http://msblog.resdev.net[/url]
    » ZackNET Forum: [url]www.zacknet.co.uk/forum[/url]
    » VistaBase: [url]www.zacknet.co.uk/vistabase[/url]
    » This mailing is provided "as is" with no warranties, and confers no
    rights. All opinions expressed are those of myself unless stated so, and not
    of my employer, best friend, mother or cat. Let's be clear on that one!


    --- Original message follows ---
    "Peter Foldes" <okf22@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:%234AHZGJRGHA.5900@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
    Beta is a Beta

    --
    Peter

    Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
    Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.

    "bri" <BBOSTWIC@OMICRON.COM> wrote in message
    news:B3758B9B-D744-4936-9D9D-D250DD1E6F8C@microsoft.com...
    >I have an application that insists on running with MDAC 2.7 or better.
    >I've
    > tried the MDAC kits for 2.7, 2.8 and 2.8 SP1 and none seem to successfully
    > install. Any recommendations?
    >
    > bri
    >

    Zack Whittaker \(R2 Mentor\) Guest

  5. #4

    Default Re: MDAC > 2.6

    Which version of MDAC does Vista have? Given that XP SP2 has 2.8 by default
    IIRC, I'd be surprised if it was anything lower.

    --
    </Slugsie>
    "bri" <BBOSTWIC@OMICRON.COM> wrote in message
    news:B3758B9B-D744-4936-9D9D-D250DD1E6F8C@microsoft.com...
    >I have an application that insists on running with MDAC 2.7 or better.
    >I've tried the MDAC kits for 2.7, 2.8 and 2.8 SP1 and none seem to
    >successfully install. Any recommendations?
    >
    > bri

    Slugsie Guest

  6. #5

    Default Re: MDAC > 2.6

    Its looks like its not even installed:
    F:\Program Files\Common Files\System\ado

    There is a HTML link here that links to downloading version 2.7
    --
    --
    Andre
    Windows Connect | [url]http://www.windowsconnected.com[/url]
    Extended64 | [url]http://www.extended64.com[/url]
    Blog | [url]http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre[/url]
    [url]http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta[/url]

    "Slugsie" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
    news:%23JTMsVJRGHA.4976@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
    > Which version of MDAC does Vista have? Given that XP SP2 has 2.8 by
    > default IIRC, I'd be surprised if it was anything lower.
    >
    > --
    > </Slugsie>
    > "bri" <BBOSTWIC@OMICRON.COM> wrote in message
    > news:B3758B9B-D744-4936-9D9D-D250DD1E6F8C@microsoft.com...
    >>I have an application that insists on running with MDAC 2.7 or better.
    >>I've tried the MDAC kits for 2.7, 2.8 and 2.8 SP1 and none seem to
    >>successfully install. Any recommendations?
    >>
    >> bri
    >
    >

    Andre Da Costa [Extended64] Guest

  7. #6

    Default Re: MDAC > 2.6

    It is not installed in Vista. At least not in this Beta. That was my answer above

    --
    Peter

    Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
    Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.

    "Andre Da Costa [Extended64]" <andred25@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:exfMctJRGHA.3916@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
    > Its looks like its not even installed:
    > F:\Program Files\Common Files\System\ado
    >
    > There is a HTML link here that links to downloading version 2.7
    > --
    > --
    > Andre
    > Windows Connect | [url]http://www.windowsconnected.com[/url]
    > Extended64 | [url]http://www.extended64.com[/url]
    > Blog | [url]http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre[/url]
    > [url]http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta[/url]
    >
    > "Slugsie" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
    > news:%23JTMsVJRGHA.4976@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
    >> Which version of MDAC does Vista have? Given that XP SP2 has 2.8 by
    >> default IIRC, I'd be surprised if it was anything lower.
    >>
    >> --
    >> </Slugsie>
    >> "bri" <BBOSTWIC@OMICRON.COM> wrote in message
    >> news:B3758B9B-D744-4936-9D9D-D250DD1E6F8C@microsoft.com...
    >>>I have an application that insists on running with MDAC 2.7 or better.
    >>>I've tried the MDAC kits for 2.7, 2.8 and 2.8 SP1 and none seem to
    >>>successfully install. Any recommendations?
    >>>
    >>> bri
    >>
    >>
    >
    >
    Peter Foldes Guest

  8. #7

    Default Re: MDAC > 2.6

    "Beta is a Beta"
    If you call that an answer, I have lost hope for you.
    --
    --
    Andre
    Windows Connect | [url]http://www.windowsconnected.com[/url]
    Extended64 | [url]http://www.extended64.com[/url]
    Blog | [url]http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre[/url]
    [url]http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta[/url]

    "Peter Foldes" <okf22@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:e3p5ilLRGHA.5296@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
    It is not installed in Vista. At least not in this Beta. That was my answer
    above

    --
    Peter

    Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
    Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.

    "Andre Da Costa [Extended64]" <andred25@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:exfMctJRGHA.3916@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
    > Its looks like its not even installed:
    > F:\Program Files\Common Files\System\ado
    >
    > There is a HTML link here that links to downloading version 2.7
    > --
    > --
    > Andre
    > Windows Connect | [url]http://www.windowsconnected.com[/url]
    > Extended64 | [url]http://www.extended64.com[/url]
    > Blog | [url]http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre[/url]
    > [url]http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta[/url]
    >
    > "Slugsie" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
    > news:%23JTMsVJRGHA.4976@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
    >> Which version of MDAC does Vista have? Given that XP SP2 has 2.8 by
    >> default IIRC, I'd be surprised if it was anything lower.
    >>
    >> --
    >> </Slugsie>
    >> "bri" <BBOSTWIC@OMICRON.COM> wrote in message
    >> news:B3758B9B-D744-4936-9D9D-D250DD1E6F8C@microsoft.com...
    >>>I have an application that insists on running with MDAC 2.7 or better.
    >>>I've tried the MDAC kits for 2.7, 2.8 and 2.8 SP1 and none seem to
    >>>successfully install. Any recommendations?
    >>>
    >>> bri
    >>
    >>
    >
    >

    Andre Da Costa [Extended64] Guest

  9. #8

    Default Re: MDAC > 2.6

    LOL.

    --
    Peter

    Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
    Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.

    "Andre Da Costa [Extended64]" <andred25@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:OfqxD6LRGHA.1608@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
    > "Beta is a Beta"
    > If you call that an answer, I have lost hope for you.
    > --
    > --
    > Andre
    > Windows Connect | [url]http://www.windowsconnected.com[/url]
    > Extended64 | [url]http://www.extended64.com[/url]
    > Blog | [url]http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre[/url]
    > [url]http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta[/url]
    >
    > "Peter Foldes" <okf22@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    > news:e3p5ilLRGHA.5296@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
    > It is not installed in Vista. At least not in this Beta. That was my answer
    > above
    >
    > --
    > Peter
    >
    > Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
    > Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.
    >
    > "Andre Da Costa [Extended64]" <andred25@hotmail.com> wrote in message
    > news:exfMctJRGHA.3916@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
    >> Its looks like its not even installed:
    >> F:\Program Files\Common Files\System\ado
    >>
    >> There is a HTML link here that links to downloading version 2.7
    >> --
    >> --
    >> Andre
    >> Windows Connect | [url]http://www.windowsconnected.com[/url]
    >> Extended64 | [url]http://www.extended64.com[/url]
    >> Blog | [url]http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre[/url]
    >> [url]http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta[/url]
    >>
    >> "Slugsie" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
    >> news:%23JTMsVJRGHA.4976@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
    >>> Which version of MDAC does Vista have? Given that XP SP2 has 2.8 by
    >>> default IIRC, I'd be surprised if it was anything lower.
    >>>
    >>> --
    >>> </Slugsie>
    >>> "bri" <BBOSTWIC@OMICRON.COM> wrote in message
    >>> news:B3758B9B-D744-4936-9D9D-D250DD1E6F8C@microsoft.com...
    >>>>I have an application that insists on running with MDAC 2.7 or better.
    >>>>I've tried the MDAC kits for 2.7, 2.8 and 2.8 SP1 and none seem to
    >>>>successfully install. Any recommendations?
    >>>>
    >>>> bri
    >>>
    >>>
    >>
    >>
    >
    >
    Peter Foldes Guest

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139