Ask a Question related to Windows Vista, Design and Development.
-
bri #1
MDAC > 2.6
I have an application that insists on running with MDAC 2.7 or better. I've
tried the MDAC kits for 2.7, 2.8 and 2.8 SP1 and none seem to successfully
install. Any recommendations?
bri
bri Guest
-
MDAC Version
Does anyone happen to know what the MDAC version is that comes installed with the new Vista OS build? Service Pack 2 for XP came with version 2.81... -
MDAC 2.8 Access & ASP
Hi All, I have one serious problem... I have a windows 2000 server, with IIS 5.0, dot net framework 1.1 installed. I have a few classic asp... -
ADO (MDAC) issue
I have a problem lies with a meta tag. Below is my code: <!--METADATA TYPE="TypeLib" NAME="Microsoft ActiveX Data Objects 2.5 Library"... -
proper installation of asp.net and mdac
I'm transitioning into asp.net developmnent and need to properly install asp.net and mdac... IIS is already installed on a server on the network.... -
Strange security issue on XP Pro with MDAC 2.7
Hi All, I have a very strange experience on subject after some desperate testing conditions. Firstly, the environment is as follows: XP Pro... -
Peter Foldes #2
Re: MDAC > 2.6
Beta is a Beta
--
Peter
Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.
"bri" <BBOSTWIC@OMICRON.COM> wrote in message news:B3758B9B-D744-4936-9D9D-D250DD1E6F8C@microsoft.com...>I have an application that insists on running with MDAC 2.7 or better. I've
> tried the MDAC kits for 2.7, 2.8 and 2.8 SP1 and none seem to successfully
> install. Any recommendations?
>
> bri
>Peter Foldes Guest
-
Zack Whittaker \(R2 Mentor\) #3
Re: MDAC > 2.6
Certainly is ;o)
--
Zack Whittaker
Microsoft Beta (Windows Server R2 Beta Mentor)
» ZackNET Enterprises: [url]www.zacknet.co.uk[/url]
» MSBlog on ResDev: [url]http://msblog.resdev.net[/url]
» ZackNET Forum: [url]www.zacknet.co.uk/forum[/url]
» VistaBase: [url]www.zacknet.co.uk/vistabase[/url]
» This mailing is provided "as is" with no warranties, and confers no
rights. All opinions expressed are those of myself unless stated so, and not
of my employer, best friend, mother or cat. Let's be clear on that one!
--- Original message follows ---
"Peter Foldes" <okf22@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:%234AHZGJRGHA.5900@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
Beta is a Beta
--
Peter
Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.
"bri" <BBOSTWIC@OMICRON.COM> wrote in message
news:B3758B9B-D744-4936-9D9D-D250DD1E6F8C@microsoft.com...>I have an application that insists on running with MDAC 2.7 or better.
>I've
> tried the MDAC kits for 2.7, 2.8 and 2.8 SP1 and none seem to successfully
> install. Any recommendations?
>
> bri
>
Zack Whittaker \(R2 Mentor\) Guest
-
Slugsie #4
Re: MDAC > 2.6
Which version of MDAC does Vista have? Given that XP SP2 has 2.8 by default
IIRC, I'd be surprised if it was anything lower.
--
</Slugsie>
"bri" <BBOSTWIC@OMICRON.COM> wrote in message
news:B3758B9B-D744-4936-9D9D-D250DD1E6F8C@microsoft.com...>I have an application that insists on running with MDAC 2.7 or better.
>I've tried the MDAC kits for 2.7, 2.8 and 2.8 SP1 and none seem to
>successfully install. Any recommendations?
>
> bri
Slugsie Guest
-
Andre Da Costa [Extended64] #5
Re: MDAC > 2.6
Its looks like its not even installed:
F:\Program Files\Common Files\System\ado
There is a HTML link here that links to downloading version 2.7
--
--
Andre
Windows Connect | [url]http://www.windowsconnected.com[/url]
Extended64 | [url]http://www.extended64.com[/url]
Blog | [url]http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre[/url]
[url]http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta[/url]
"Slugsie" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:%23JTMsVJRGHA.4976@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...> Which version of MDAC does Vista have? Given that XP SP2 has 2.8 by
> default IIRC, I'd be surprised if it was anything lower.
>
> --
> </Slugsie>
> "bri" <BBOSTWIC@OMICRON.COM> wrote in message
> news:B3758B9B-D744-4936-9D9D-D250DD1E6F8C@microsoft.com...>>>I have an application that insists on running with MDAC 2.7 or better.
>>I've tried the MDAC kits for 2.7, 2.8 and 2.8 SP1 and none seem to
>>successfully install. Any recommendations?
>>
>> bri
>
Andre Da Costa [Extended64] Guest
-
Peter Foldes #6
Re: MDAC > 2.6
It is not installed in Vista. At least not in this Beta. That was my answer above
--
Peter
Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.
"Andre Da Costa [Extended64]" <andred25@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:exfMctJRGHA.3916@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...> Its looks like its not even installed:
> F:\Program Files\Common Files\System\ado
>
> There is a HTML link here that links to downloading version 2.7
> --
> --
> Andre
> Windows Connect | [url]http://www.windowsconnected.com[/url]
> Extended64 | [url]http://www.extended64.com[/url]
> Blog | [url]http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre[/url]
> [url]http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta[/url]
>
> "Slugsie" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
> news:%23JTMsVJRGHA.4976@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...>>> Which version of MDAC does Vista have? Given that XP SP2 has 2.8 by
>> default IIRC, I'd be surprised if it was anything lower.
>>
>> --
>> </Slugsie>
>> "bri" <BBOSTWIC@OMICRON.COM> wrote in message
>> news:B3758B9B-D744-4936-9D9D-D250DD1E6F8C@microsoft.com...>>>>>I have an application that insists on running with MDAC 2.7 or better.
>>>I've tried the MDAC kits for 2.7, 2.8 and 2.8 SP1 and none seem to
>>>successfully install. Any recommendations?
>>>
>>> bri
>>
>Peter Foldes Guest
-
Andre Da Costa [Extended64] #7
Re: MDAC > 2.6
"Beta is a Beta"
If you call that an answer, I have lost hope for you.
--
--
Andre
Windows Connect | [url]http://www.windowsconnected.com[/url]
Extended64 | [url]http://www.extended64.com[/url]
Blog | [url]http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre[/url]
[url]http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta[/url]
"Peter Foldes" <okf22@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:e3p5ilLRGHA.5296@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
It is not installed in Vista. At least not in this Beta. That was my answer
above
--
Peter
Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.
"Andre Da Costa [Extended64]" <andred25@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:exfMctJRGHA.3916@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...> Its looks like its not even installed:
> F:\Program Files\Common Files\System\ado
>
> There is a HTML link here that links to downloading version 2.7
> --
> --
> Andre
> Windows Connect | [url]http://www.windowsconnected.com[/url]
> Extended64 | [url]http://www.extended64.com[/url]
> Blog | [url]http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre[/url]
> [url]http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta[/url]
>
> "Slugsie" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
> news:%23JTMsVJRGHA.4976@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...>>> Which version of MDAC does Vista have? Given that XP SP2 has 2.8 by
>> default IIRC, I'd be surprised if it was anything lower.
>>
>> --
>> </Slugsie>
>> "bri" <BBOSTWIC@OMICRON.COM> wrote in message
>> news:B3758B9B-D744-4936-9D9D-D250DD1E6F8C@microsoft.com...>>>>>I have an application that insists on running with MDAC 2.7 or better.
>>>I've tried the MDAC kits for 2.7, 2.8 and 2.8 SP1 and none seem to
>>>successfully install. Any recommendations?
>>>
>>> bri
>>
>
Andre Da Costa [Extended64] Guest
-
Peter Foldes #8
Re: MDAC > 2.6
LOL.
--
Peter
Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.
"Andre Da Costa [Extended64]" <andred25@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:OfqxD6LRGHA.1608@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...> "Beta is a Beta"
> If you call that an answer, I have lost hope for you.
> --
> --
> Andre
> Windows Connect | [url]http://www.windowsconnected.com[/url]
> Extended64 | [url]http://www.extended64.com[/url]
> Blog | [url]http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre[/url]
> [url]http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta[/url]
>
> "Peter Foldes" <okf22@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:e3p5ilLRGHA.5296@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> It is not installed in Vista. At least not in this Beta. That was my answer
> above
>
> --
> Peter
>
> Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
> Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.
>
> "Andre Da Costa [Extended64]" <andred25@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:exfMctJRGHA.3916@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...>>> Its looks like its not even installed:
>> F:\Program Files\Common Files\System\ado
>>
>> There is a HTML link here that links to downloading version 2.7
>> --
>> --
>> Andre
>> Windows Connect | [url]http://www.windowsconnected.com[/url]
>> Extended64 | [url]http://www.extended64.com[/url]
>> Blog | [url]http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre[/url]
>> [url]http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta[/url]
>>
>> "Slugsie" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
>> news:%23JTMsVJRGHA.4976@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...>>>>> Which version of MDAC does Vista have? Given that XP SP2 has 2.8 by
>>> default IIRC, I'd be surprised if it was anything lower.
>>>
>>> --
>>> </Slugsie>
>>> "bri" <BBOSTWIC@OMICRON.COM> wrote in message
>>> news:B3758B9B-D744-4936-9D9D-D250DD1E6F8C@microsoft.com...
>>>>I have an application that insists on running with MDAC 2.7 or better.
>>>>I've tried the MDAC kits for 2.7, 2.8 and 2.8 SP1 and none seem to
>>>>successfully install. Any recommendations?
>>>>
>>>> bri
>>>
>>>
>>
>Peter Foldes Guest



Reply With Quote

