metattach: /dev/md/rdsk/d10: No Such device or address

Ask a Question related to Sun Solaris, Design and Development.

  1. #1

    Default Re: metattach: /dev/md/rdsk/d10: No Such device or address

    Need to add one more detail.....

    ->$ metareplace -e d0 c0t0d0s0
    metareplace: drew: d0: c0t0d0s0: can't find component in unit

    and dito for all other slices.

    Rocke Robertson Guest

  2. Similar Questions and Discussions

    1. Device name changes.
      On 2006-02-10, Richard <rgriley@gmail.com> wrote: A similar thing happened to me recently. I went to great lengths to get my girlfriend's ipod to...
    2. usb device problem
      I have 2 usb 3com webcams and trying to get them both to work with 2.4.21. On boot i get the folowing messages. hub.c: new USB device 00:0b.0-1,...
    3. Which USB Flash device?
      What USB solid-state memory devices can I expect to use under Solaris 8? Sun's hardware compatibility list...
    4. local device name already in use
      I've had this XP PRO box several weeks. After working just fine, it now looses its connection to its mapped network drives and gives the 'An error...
    5. The local device is already in use!
      Hi, I changed the DNS servers IP addresses (Primary and Secondary)in the Windows 2000 server. Since then my Windows 2000 Professional and Windows...
  3. #2

    Default Re: metattach: /dev/md/rdsk/d10: No Such device or address

    [Rocke Robertson]:
    >
    > I had a failed disk, (root), I dettached all submirrors, did a
    > metadb -d c0t0d0s0 to remove db's then removed the HDD live. I
    > couldn't get luxadm to remove the wwn's, so I removed the device
    > nodes for c0t0d0sX's. Added new hdd, I then did a luxadm insert,
    > it saw the new drive and created the new devices. (It's an FCAL
    > drive).
    isn't this unnecessarily complex? I'd just replace the drive,
    possibly run drvconfig, and then fix metadb and run metareplace -e on
    the affected mirrors. has worked fine for me.

    --
    Kjetil T. | read and make up your own mind
    | [url]http://www.cactus48.com/truth.html[/url]
    Kjetil Torgrim Homme Guest

  4. #3

    Default Re: metattach: /dev/md/rdsk/d10: No Such device or address



    Kjetil Torgrim Homme wrote:
    > [Rocke Robertson]:
    > >
    > > I had a failed disk, (root), I dettached all submirrors, did a
    > > metadb -d c0t0d0s0 to remove db's then removed the HDD live. I
    > > couldn't get luxadm to remove the wwn's, so I removed the device
    > > nodes for c0t0d0sX's. Added new hdd, I then did a luxadm insert,
    > > it saw the new drive and created the new devices. (It's an FCAL
    > > drive).
    >
    > isn't this unnecessarily complex? I'd just replace the drive,
    > possibly run drvconfig, and then fix metadb and run metareplace -e on
    > the affected mirrors. has worked fine for me.
    >
    > --
    > Kjetil T. | read and make up your own mind
    > | [url]http://www.cactus48.com/truth.html[/url]
    In retrospect, you are absolutely right.

    ~rocker


    Rocke Robertson Guest

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139