Ask a Question related to Sun Solaris, Design and Development.
-
Rocke Robertson #1
Re: metattach: /dev/md/rdsk/d10: No Such device or address
Need to add one more detail.....
->$ metareplace -e d0 c0t0d0s0
metareplace: drew: d0: c0t0d0s0: can't find component in unit
and dito for all other slices.
Rocke Robertson Guest
-
Device name changes.
On 2006-02-10, Richard <rgriley@gmail.com> wrote: A similar thing happened to me recently. I went to great lengths to get my girlfriend's ipod to... -
usb device problem
I have 2 usb 3com webcams and trying to get them both to work with 2.4.21. On boot i get the folowing messages. hub.c: new USB device 00:0b.0-1,... -
Which USB Flash device?
What USB solid-state memory devices can I expect to use under Solaris 8? Sun's hardware compatibility list... -
local device name already in use
I've had this XP PRO box several weeks. After working just fine, it now looses its connection to its mapped network drives and gives the 'An error... -
The local device is already in use!
Hi, I changed the DNS servers IP addresses (Primary and Secondary)in the Windows 2000 server. Since then my Windows 2000 Professional and Windows... -
Kjetil Torgrim Homme #2
Re: metattach: /dev/md/rdsk/d10: No Such device or address
[Rocke Robertson]:
isn't this unnecessarily complex? I'd just replace the drive,>
> I had a failed disk, (root), I dettached all submirrors, did a
> metadb -d c0t0d0s0 to remove db's then removed the HDD live. I
> couldn't get luxadm to remove the wwn's, so I removed the device
> nodes for c0t0d0sX's. Added new hdd, I then did a luxadm insert,
> it saw the new drive and created the new devices. (It's an FCAL
> drive).
possibly run drvconfig, and then fix metadb and run metareplace -e on
the affected mirrors. has worked fine for me.
--
Kjetil T. | read and make up your own mind
| [url]http://www.cactus48.com/truth.html[/url]
Kjetil Torgrim Homme Guest
-
Rocke Robertson #3
Re: metattach: /dev/md/rdsk/d10: No Such device or address
Kjetil Torgrim Homme wrote:
In retrospect, you are absolutely right.> [Rocke Robertson]:>> >
> > I had a failed disk, (root), I dettached all submirrors, did a
> > metadb -d c0t0d0s0 to remove db's then removed the HDD live. I
> > couldn't get luxadm to remove the wwn's, so I removed the device
> > nodes for c0t0d0sX's. Added new hdd, I then did a luxadm insert,
> > it saw the new drive and created the new devices. (It's an FCAL
> > drive).
> isn't this unnecessarily complex? I'd just replace the drive,
> possibly run drvconfig, and then fix metadb and run metareplace -e on
> the affected mirrors. has worked fine for me.
>
> --
> Kjetil T. | read and make up your own mind
> | [url]http://www.cactus48.com/truth.html[/url]
~rocker
Rocke Robertson Guest



Reply With Quote

