Professional Web Applications Themes

MI5 Persecution: their methods and tactics - MySQL

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= -= MI5: methods and tactics -= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= They deliberately set out to harass in a way that would resemble the symptoms of schizophrenia, so that any report of the harassment would be taken as indicating mental illness and "treated" accordingly. They never show their own faces; they only work through proxies, in the media, among the public, and by manipulating people in the workplace. Since they do not declare their identity there is no evidence to initiate legal action against the security services or anyone else. The only people you can prosecute are the proxies and they will deny ...

  1. #1

    Default MI5 Persecution: their methods and tactics

    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    -= MI5: methods and tactics -=
    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

    They deliberately set out to harass in a way that would resemble the
    symptoms of schizophrenia, so that any report of the harassment would be
    taken as indicating mental illness and "treated" accordingly. They never
    show their own faces; they only work through proxies, in the media, among
    the public, and by manipulating people in the workplace. Since they do not
    declare their identity there is no evidence to initiate legal action
    against the security services or anyone else. The only people you can
    prosecute are the proxies and they will deny knowledge of any conspiracy.

    By repeatedly humiliating and abusing the victim, they induced mental
    illness. This is the worst form of human rights violation: making any
    statement of the harassment appear to be symptomatic of the illness which
    they cause through the harassment. That this can happen, and people collude
    by silence, is absolutely horrifying.

    From the beginning in June 1990 they set a pattern of harassment which they
    have followed without change for the last six years. They paint me as a
    "threat" to which people must "react" (shades of Nazi persecution methods),
    while simultaneously portraying their hate campaign on which they have
    spent over a million pounds of taxpayers’ money as a "joke".

    The MI5 that breaks the law with the silent complicity of the police is the
    same agency that is now seeking a role in the fight against crime. Perhaps
    the real joke is the proposed involvement in the implementation of justice
    of an organisation which commits criminal acts with secrecy and disinterest
    for the legal process.

    289


    --
    Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

    MI5-Victim@mi5.gov.uk Guest

  2. #2

    Default MI5 Persecution: their methods and tactics

    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    -= why the security services? -=
    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

    You may ask, why do I think the "they" referred to are the security
    services? Is there any evidence that there is a single source, as opposed
    to a loosely based "whispering campaign" amongst many people? Even if there
    is a single source, is there any evidence that "they" are professional
    "buggers" as opposed to amateurs, or perhaps people working for a privately
    funded organization?

    a) As to the question of a single source versus something more fragmented;
    it is quite obvious that there is a single source from the way the campaign
    has been carried out. Since things have been repeated verbatim which were
    said in my home, there must be one group which does the watching and
    listening. Since on several occasions (mainly during travel) people have
    been planted in close proximity and rehed in what they were to say, it
    follows that someone must have done the planning for that, and again a
    single source is indicated.

    b) So why couldn't it be amateurs? Why couldn't it be a private
    organisation, for example a private detective agency paid to manage the
    campaign and undertake the technical aspects? Some detective agencies are
    unscrupulous as has been proved on the occasions in the past when they've
    been exposed or caught; they too can have access to the bugging technology
    deployed; and there are reported cases of MI5 paying private eyes to do
    their dirty work (against peace campaigners and similar enemies of the
    state) on the understanding that if they were caught then they could deny
    all knowledge. Why couldn't that be the case?

    The main factor pointing to direct security service involvement (as opposed
    to amateurs or MI5 proxies) is the breadth of their access to the media in
    particular, and the fact that the television companies are so involved in
    the campaign. The BBC would not directly invade someone's home themselves,
    since it would not be within their remit to allocate personnel or financial
    resources to do so. An organisation of their stature would not take part in
    a campaign set up by private sources. The only people they would take
    material from would be the security services, presumably on the assumption
    that if the cat ever flew out of the bag yowling it would be MI5 who would
    take the consequences.

    State sponsorship for these acts of psychological terrorism is also
    indicated by duration; support for over six years for a team of three or
    four people would be beyond the means and will of most private sources.
    The viciousness of the slanders and personal denigration also points to
    MI5; they traditionally "protect" the British state from politicians of the
    wrong hue by character assassination, and in this case are using their
    tried and tested methods to murder with words an enemy they have invented
    for themselves.

    And there are precedents. Diana and Hewitt were alleged to have been filmed
    "at it" by an Army intelligence team which had operated in Northern
    Ireland, these allegations were made by someone called Jones who had been
    on the team. His statements were denied by the defence establishment who
    tried to character-assassinate by describing him as the "Jones twins".
    Funny how if you tell the truth, then you must be ill, isn't it? Thought
    only communists behaved like that?

    Hewitt later said that he'd been spoken to by someone in the army who
    revealed the existence of videotapes of him and Diana, and that the tapes
    would be published if any attempt was made by them to resume their
    association.

    289


    --
    Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

    MI5-Victim@mi5.gov.uk Guest

  3. #3

    Default MI5 Persecution: their methods and tactics

    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    -= MI5: methods and tactics -=
    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

    They deliberately set out to harass in a way that would resemble the
    symptoms of schizophrenia, so that any report of the harassment would be
    taken as indicating mental illness and "treated" accordingly. They never
    show their own faces; they only work through proxies, in the media, among
    the public, and by manipulating people in the workplace. Since they do not
    declare their identity there is no evidence to initiate legal action
    against the security services or anyone else. The only people you can
    prosecute are the proxies and they will deny knowledge of any conspiracy.

    By repeatedly humiliating and abusing the victim, they induced mental
    illness. This is the worst form of human rights violation: making any
    statement of the harassment appear to be symptomatic of the illness which
    they cause through the harassment. That this can happen, and people collude
    by silence, is absolutely horrifying.

    From the beginning in June 1990 they set a pattern of harassment which they
    have followed without change for the last six years. They paint me as a
    "threat" to which people must "react" (shades of Nazi persecution methods),
    while simultaneously portraying their hate campaign on which they have
    spent over a million pounds of taxpayers’ money as a "joke".

    The MI5 that breaks the law with the silent complicity of the police is the
    same agency that is now seeking a role in the fight against crime. Perhaps
    the real joke is the proposed involvement in the implementation of justice
    of an organisation which commits criminal acts with secrecy and disinterest
    for the legal process.

    583


    --
    Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

    MI5Victim@mi5.gov.uk Guest

Similar Threads

  1. MI5 Persecution: their methods and tactics
    By MI5-Victim@mi5.gov.uk in forum Adobe Indesign Macintosh
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: December 27th, 06:19 AM
  2. MI5 Persecution: their methods and tactics
    By MI5-Victim@mi5.gov.uk in forum Coldfusion Database Access
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: December 27th, 06:06 AM
  3. #26350 [NEW]: Inherited methods can't access private methods
    By forseti at oak dot rpg dot pl in forum PHP Development
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: November 21st, 02:31 PM
  4. Replies: 8
    Last Post: July 18th, 04:34 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139