More efficient RFC 1867 uploads?

Ask a Question related to ASP.NET General, Design and Development.

  1. #1

    Default Re: More efficient RFC 1867 uploads?

    The uoload limits is adjustable in machine.config if you have access to it,
    yiu can probably override it in local web.config too, though I've never
    tried it.

    Incidentally, theres a huge thread on uploading huge files at [url]www.asp.net[/url] in
    the HTTPModules discussion section

    --
    Regards

    John Timney (Microsoft ASP.NET MVP)
    ----------------------------------------------
    <shameless_author_plug>
    Professional .NET for Java Developers with C#
    ISBN:1-861007-91-4
    Professional Windows Forms
    ISBN: 1861005547
    Professional JSP 2nd Edition
    ISBN: 1861004958
    Professional JSP
    ISBN: 1861003625
    Beginning JSP Web Development
    ISBN: 1861002092
    </shameless_author_plug>
    ----------------------------------------------

    "Richard K Bethell" <cj434@freenet.carleton.ca> wrote in message
    news:O2Fn1M6RDHA.2188@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
    > Hi,
    >
    > Is there a more efficient way to handle RFC 1867 uploads then simply
    setting
    > a file input to runat=server? The problem I am facing is that, with
    > asp.net's security limits on memory use, it isn't too hard to tap out a
    > server's abilities with a handful of large file uploads.
    >
    > Is there a way to pace the Request object and extract binary data a few
    > bytes at a time, so that I am not maxing out asp.net? I don't mind if it
    is
    > a little harder to implement, but I need to find a way to gain a bit of
    > robustness.
    >
    > Richard
    >
    >

    John Timney \(Microsoft MVP\) Guest

  2. Similar Questions and Discussions

    1. Working Efficient with ID CS
      Hello, A couple of weeks ago I went to a seminar of ID CS Page maker edition. I saw that ID has much more possibilities than Page maker 6.5 which...
    2. What is more efficient (*.a or *.so) libraries?
      Hi, Recently I developed a series of static libraries (*.a files) for performing various different operations. I used these libraries to create...
    3. Looking for the most EFFICIENT way to do the following...
      I have a table that has links in it. Columns: id, item, link_name, url. I want to run through the recordset of this table and so something like...
    4. Efficient structure
      I have multiple types of information to associate to one object. I have data structures that store data structures. What is the best/most...
    5. Efficient query without using NOT IN clause
      Hi all, I have got two tables:- a) students ======== std_id Numeric std_name Varchar(50) std_grade Varchar(10)
  3. #2

    Default Re: More efficient RFC 1867 uploads?

    I can confirm that Web.Config will override the Machine.Config setting.

    but that's not what he's asking here...

    "John Timney (Microsoft MVP)" <xyztimneyj@btinternet.com> wrote in message
    news:e4y6me9RDHA.2144@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
    > The uoload limits is adjustable in machine.config if you have access to
    it,
    > yiu can probably override it in local web.config too, though I've never
    > tried it.
    >
    > Incidentally, theres a huge thread on uploading huge files at [url]www.asp.net[/url]
    in
    > the HTTPModules discussion section
    >
    > --
    > Regards
    >
    > John Timney (Microsoft ASP.NET MVP)
    > ----------------------------------------------
    > <shameless_author_plug>
    > Professional .NET for Java Developers with C#
    > ISBN:1-861007-91-4
    > Professional Windows Forms
    > ISBN: 1861005547
    > Professional JSP 2nd Edition
    > ISBN: 1861004958
    > Professional JSP
    > ISBN: 1861003625
    > Beginning JSP Web Development
    > ISBN: 1861002092
    > </shameless_author_plug>
    > ----------------------------------------------
    >
    > "Richard K Bethell" <cj434@freenet.carleton.ca> wrote in message
    > news:O2Fn1M6RDHA.2188@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
    > > Hi,
    > >
    > > Is there a more efficient way to handle RFC 1867 uploads then simply
    > setting
    > > a file input to runat=server? The problem I am facing is that, with
    > > asp.net's security limits on memory use, it isn't too hard to tap out a
    > > server's abilities with a handful of large file uploads.
    > >
    > > Is there a way to pace the Request object and extract binary data a few
    > > bytes at a time, so that I am not maxing out asp.net? I don't mind if it
    > is
    > > a little harder to implement, but I need to find a way to gain a bit of
    > > robustness.
    > >
    > > Richard
    > >
    > >
    >
    >

    David Waz... Guest

  4. #3

    Default Re: More efficient RFC 1867 uploads?

    "Richard K Bethell" <cj434@freenet.carleton.ca> wrote in message
    news:O2Fn1M6RDHA.2188@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
    > Hi,
    >
    > Is there a more efficient way to handle RFC 1867 uploads then simply
    setting
    > a file input to runat=server? The problem I am facing is that, with
    > asp.net's security limits on memory use, it isn't too hard to tap out a
    > server's abilities with a handful of large file uploads.
    >
    > Is there a way to pace the Request object and extract binary data a few
    > bytes at a time, so that I am not maxing out asp.net? I don't mind if it
    is
    > a little harder to implement, but I need to find a way to gain a bit of
    > robustness.
    Has noone any ideas on how to pace incoming post data for a binary upload?

    R.


    Richard K Bethell Guest

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139