Ask a Question related to Dreamweaver AppDev, Design and Development.
-
xcoldnet #1
MS Access vs MySQL
I am using MS Access 2002. One of the field of my table in the database require
to store images. I am realizing, please correct me if I am wrong, that I can
use only .btm or .psd (photoshop) files as the sources for the images.
Basically if I pass a .jpg or .gif image I am going to get an error, as it
happens using <CFINSERT> at the moment. So the question is: Will MySQL a
better choice than MS Acess 2002 in order to store and retreive images like
..jpg and .gif? Thank you, Dario
xcoldnet Guest
-
Access does not like Mysql
I am having a problem creating Access tables linked to a Mysql database. I get the widow to select a Data Source, click on the (system) DSN I... -
Access to mySQL db
How can I export my access db structure (and query/procedure), and import them to mySQL db? In SQL Server, it has function to 'Generate SQL'. In... -
MySQL to Access!
I now have to change my database from my MySQL to Access. Does it mean a lot? Do I have to do a lot? Can anyone throw light on this issue? ... -
ms access to MYSQL
i have developed a web site in ASP with backend msaccess. now i have to shift existing data to MYSQL Database, and use MYSQL database instead of... -
MySQL vs. Access
Which should I use? And is MySQL free? Does it need special software to run? Advantages/disadvantages? And how difficult is it to move everything... -
xcoldnet #2
MS Access vs MySQL
I am using MS Access 2002. One of the field of my table in the database require
to store images. I am realizing, please correct me if I am wrong, that I can
use only .btm or .psd (photoshop) files as the sources for the images.
Basically if I pass a .jpg or .gif image I am going to get an error, as it
happens using <CFINSERT> at the moment. So the question is: MySQL will be a
better choice than MS Acess 2002, in order to store and retreive images like
..jpg and .gif? or not. Thank you, Dario
xcoldnet Guest
-
CMBergin #3
Re: MS Access vs MySQL
You are incorrect. A binary file is a binary file, and Access should store
jpeg, gif, pdf, or anything else you put into a binary field. The problem
is making sure it's read correctly when it's pulled out. Since I never
store files and only store the file paths in my database, I can't be of any
other help than to say you can certainly store what you want. It must be
some other problem.
"xcoldnet" <webforumsuser@macromedia.com> wrote in message
news:cvl1cp$31k$1@forums.macromedia.com...require> I am using MS Access 2002. One of the field of my table in the databasecan> to store images. I am realizing, please correct me if I am wrong, that Ilike> use only .btm or .psd (photoshop) files as the sources for the images.
> Basically if I pass a .jpg or .gif image I am going to get an error, as it
> happens using <CFINSERT> at the moment. So the question is: Will MySQL a
> better choice than MS Acess 2002 in order to store and retreive images> .jpg and .gif? Thank you, Dario
>
CMBergin Guest
-
Manuel Socarras #4
Re: MS Access vs MySQL
sorry, not an answer just to ask, why do you store the images in the DB?
I think the best approach is to store just the file names in the DB
& the images in a folder
manuel
xcoldnet wrote:> I am using MS Access 2002. One of the field of my table in the database require
> to store images. I am realizing, please correct me if I am wrong, that I can
> use only .btm or .psd (photoshop) files as the sources for the images.
> Basically if I pass a .jpg or .gif image I am going to get an error, as it
> happens using <CFINSERT> at the moment. So the question is: Will MySQL a
> better choice than MS Acess 2002 in order to store and retreive images like
> .jpg and .gif? Thank you, Dario
>Manuel Socarras Guest



Reply With Quote

