Need help with something really basic!!

[friscuolo]

Hi,

I have a very annoying problem, I am trying to create a site that is contained
within a table that is 100% W by 100% H, so that if the user resizes their
browser window, the site will resize along with it. The only trouble is, if
there is not enough content in the table, in Safari the table height will only
be as deep as the content, not the depth of the browser window, for example if
there is no contant in the table, it will just be a bar across the top of the
page about 10pixels deep when I want it to be the full depth. It works fine in
Explorer, but not in Safari. I am just setting the table width and height to
100%. Is there a better way to achieve this?

Any help is greatly appreciated!!

[Murray *ACE*]

[url]http://www.apptools.com/examples/tableheight.php[/url]

--
Murray --- ICQ 71997575
Adobe Community Expert
(If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
==================
[url]http://www.dreamweavermx-templates.com[/url] - Template Triage!
[url]http://www.projectseven.com/go[/url] - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
[url]http://www.dwfaq.com[/url] - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
[url]http://www.macromedia.com/support/search/[/url] - Macromedia (MM) Technotes
==================


"friscuolo" <webforumsuser@macromedia.com> wrote in message
news:e8ls03$as$1@forums.macromedia.com...

> Hi,
>
> I have a very annoying problem, I am trying to create a site that is
> contained
> within a table that is 100% W by 100% H, so that if the user resizes their
> browser window, the site will resize along with it. The only trouble is,
> if
> there is not enough content in the table, in Safari the table height will
> only
> be as deep as the content, not the depth of the browser window, for
> example if
> there is no contant in the table, it will just be a bar across the top of
> the
> page about 10pixels deep when I want it to be the full depth. It works
> fine in
> Explorer, but not in Safari. I am just setting the table width and height
> to
> 100%. Is there a better way to achieve this?
>
> Any help is greatly appreciated!!
>