"Tim O'Connor" <tbospams.bigpond.net.au> wrote:
>Hi all :-)
>I used to own the original 24-120, and didnt think it was bad at all, even
>at 120 - Im wondering if this new version a complete departure in optical
>design, or more of an update?
Obviously the new lens has significantly altered optics due to the
need to incorporate the VR elements and mechanism. Until actual
production samples are in the hands of honest reviewers (and that cuts
out a great many magazines and web sites) we can only speculate.