>From: [email]bostjantsc-laba.si[/email] (Bostjan)>Newsgroups: rec.photo.digitalThe 5050m takes great pictures--the 5mp's really show their worth when you make>I have c-2100 for almost two years now.
>I'm thinking of buying c-5050 or c-750. It's not a necessity but I'm
>considering it. The best would be a combination of c-2100 (zoom + IS +
>electronic viewfinder) and c-5050 (5 MP, small, Mg-alloy, functions).
>What do you think? Should I go for c-5050 or c-750? Did anyone compare
>photos, is there really a big difference and 5 mp shows it's strength
>over 2.1 mp?
>Or should I just stay on C-2100?
>Help me with this one, I'm really in perception?
big pix--with the 5050 and the Epson 1270, i mostly crank out 11x17's or 13x20
with a few 8 1/2x11's--of course if you only take snapshots not worthy of
upsizing then you don't need a camera like the 5050. Apart from the 5mp the
5050 is a very versatile camera--fast f1.8 lens--smart media, compact flash and
xd capability, lots of bells and whistles and adjustments--if you are serious
about taking pictures you won't go wrong with the m5050.>