Oracle configuration on Enterprise E450

[damorgan]

grjohnson wrote:

> Do you mean your redo logs groups have only one member and then mirror
> your redo groups at an os level (instead of multiplexing them via
> oracle, i.e. groups have multiple members on separate disks.) If so,
> then you have Single point of failure. Because if a redo log becomes
> corrupt, that corruption is mirrored also.

<snipped>

I highly doubt it. Doing so would bring a database to its knees with every checkpoint.

Daniel Morgan

[damorgan]

grjohnson wrote:

> Do you mean your redo logs groups have only one member and then mirror
> your redo groups at an os level (instead of multiplexing them via
> oracle, i.e. groups have multiple members on separate disks.) If so,
> then you have Single point of failure. Because if a redo log becomes
> corrupt, that corruption is mirrored also.

<snipped>

I highly doubt it. Doing so would bring a database to its knees with every checkpoint.

Daniel Morgan