Ask a Question related to ASP, Design and Development.
-
Andrew Durstewitz #1
OT: Another reason to NOT use .NET
Read this article, it's great. Seeing a number of these across the
internet I have been very hesitant in moving my design platform. Any
opions?
[url]http://books.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/05/20/1640225&mode=nested[/url]
-Andrew
* * * Sent via DevBuilder [url]http://www.devbuilder.org[/url] * * *
Developer Resources for High End Developers.
Andrew Durstewitz Guest
-
CFQUERY not working for some reason
I have the following code to authenticate a password, and it is successful, complete the <CFIF> Statement: <cfquery name="checkpass"... -
Duplicate files without any reason
:( Without any reason contribute has created multiple copies of files. All the files have the same content The filesare different in the file... -
No components working for no reason!
Oh my god! For some reason every single page that relies on a component, doesn't work! This is horrible! I always get this. The system has... -
Is there some reason why warn and die would be very very slow?
I have some not-unusual warn and die statements in my perlcode. Im using 5.8 on a linux RH8 box. The code runs fine, and even the warn and die... -
Any reason why....
That's just the way they created the application. Some (but not all) effects that aren't available to the full CMYK image CAN be used if you apply... -
Aaron Bertrand - MVP #2
Re: Another reason to NOT use .NET
I don't think that's a reason to fear .NET. I just think it's another
reminder that no platform or language is going to allow us to be lazy... we
need to continue being diligent and always considering security issues when
writing applications, period.
"Andrew Durstewitz" <adurstew@devbuilder.org> wrote in message
news:3f0eed22$0$206$75868355@news.frii.net...> Read this article, it's great. Seeing a number of these across the
> internet I have been very hesitant in moving my design platform. Any
> opions?
>
> [url]http://books.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/05/20/1640225&mode=nested[/url]
>
> -Andrew
>
> * * * Sent via DevBuilder [url]http://www.devbuilder.org[/url] * * *
> Developer Resources for High End Developers.
Aaron Bertrand - MVP Guest
-
Aaron Bertrand - MVP #3
Re: Another reason to NOT use .NET
> As far as I know ASP doesn't have much in the way of "programming"
Anything Microsoft produces is at least twice as likely to be hacked because> holes. However, I know IIS does. But IIS still serves .NET! So does
> this mean that .NET is 2 times as chance to be hacked?
they are a popular target. The question is, twice as likely compared to
what? Anything is likely to be hacked... you can leave the "most secure"
system in the world wide open, it's all about laziness.
If you're that paranoid about using a particular technology that the threat
of being hacked exceeds your willingness to make your systems secure, maybe
you should be in another business...
Aaron Bertrand - MVP Guest
-
Andrew Durstewitz #4
Re: Another reason to NOT use .NET
I am talking compared to some Open Source products, such as Apache. I
primarily develope application in ASP and .NET on Linux to insure the
highest protection. Just by that fact proves that I am not "LAZY" in my
security efforts.
I do understand the "visability" of MS being a factor of the security.
But I am less than thrilled on the "overall" developer communities
adoption of .NET. Even MS it's self has droped the name .NET from it's
vocabulary.
-Andrew
* * * Sent via DevBuilder [url]http://www.devbuilder.org[/url] * * *
Developer Resources for High End Developers.
Andrew Durstewitz Guest
-
Aaron Bertrand - MVP #5
Re: Another reason to NOT use .NET
> But I am less than thrilled on the "overall" developer communities
*sigh*> adoption of .NET. Even MS it's self has droped the name .NET from it's
> vocabulary.
A name is just a name. Which version of Visual Studio are you using? Is
anyone at your company using VB.Net or C#?
Don't reply to your original post. Follow the thread, then we know who
you're replying to.
Aaron Bertrand - MVP Guest
-
Andrew Durstewitz #6
Re: Another reason to NOT use .NET
>*sigh*
Is>
>A name is just a name. Which version of Visual >Studio are you using?I am using VB.NET and have been thinking about using ASP.NET in place of>anyone at your company using VB.Net or C#?
>
>Don't reply to your original post. Follow the >thread, then we know who
>you're replying to.
traditional ASP, but have found ASP.NET lacking.
-Andrew
* * * Sent via DevBuilder [url]http://www.devbuilder.org[/url] * * *
Developer Resources for High End Developers.
Andrew Durstewitz Guest
-
Tom Kaminski [MVP] #7
Re: Another reason to NOT use .NET
"Andrew Durstewitz" <adurstew@devbuilder.org> wrote in message
news:3f0f0393$0$201$75868355@news.frii.net...If you "primarily develope application in ASP and .NET on Linux to insure> Is> >*sigh*
> >
> >A name is just a name. Which version of Visual >Studio are you using?>> >anyone at your company using VB.Net or C#?
> >
> >Don't reply to your original post. Follow the >thread, then we know who
> >you're replying to.
> I am using VB.NET and have been thinking about using ASP.NET in place of
> traditional ASP, but have found ASP.NET lacking.
the highest protection", then that's quite understandable ..
--
Tom Kaminski IIS MVP
[url]http://www.iistoolshed.com/[/url] - tools, scripts, and utilities for running IIS
[url]http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/[/url]
[url]http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/community/centers/iis/[/url]
Tom Kaminski [MVP] Guest
-
Andrew Durstewitz #8
Re: Another reason to NOT use .NET
>If you "primarily develope application in ASP >and .NET on Linux to
insureOk...>the highest protection", then that's quite >understandable ..
However my orgional post was to get some discussion around the use of
NET over the use of traditional ASP and VB applications. Any thoughts?
Do you use .NET over traditional ASP?
-Andrew
* * * Sent via DevBuilder [url]http://www.devbuilder.org[/url] * * *
Developer Resources for High End Developers.
Andrew Durstewitz Guest
-
Ray at #9
Re: Another reason to NOT use .NET
My first impression of ASP.NET is that it's designed for people who want
auto-pilot. Datagrids seem totally bogus. All it's doing is writing your
HTML for you. I prefer to write my own. But, I can see myself going all
..NET but only taking advantage of a few of the features. I can't see myself
using datagrids or anything like that. I will continue to just code
everything and write my own HTML in Textpad. ([url]www.textpad.com[/url] - buy it
now!)
Ray at home
"Andrew Durstewitz" <adurstew@devbuilder.org> wrote in message
news:3f0f14eb$0$204$75868355@news.frii.net...> insure> >If you "primarily develope application in ASP >and .NET on Linux to>> >the highest protection", then that's quite >understandable ..
> Ok...
>
> However my orgional post was to get some discussion around the use of
> NET over the use of traditional ASP and VB applications. Any thoughts?
> Do you use .NET over traditional ASP?
>
> -Andrew
>
> * * * Sent via DevBuilder [url]http://www.devbuilder.org[/url] * * *
> Developer Resources for High End Developers.
Ray at Guest
-
Andrew Durstewitz #10
Re: Another reason to NOT use .NET
May the force be with you! :o) I like to hear that other coders do
everything by hand. To much GUI is bad for the brain. Mountan Dew on
the other hand is good for the brain!
-Andrew
* * * Sent via DevBuilder [url]http://www.devbuilder.org[/url] * * *
Developer Resources for High End Developers.
Andrew Durstewitz Guest
-
Ray at #11
Re: [OT] Re: Another reason to NOT use .NET
He he. Textpad rules.
Ray at work
"Don Verhagen" <news@southeast-florida.com> wrote in message
news:ben7ti$75p8b$1@ID-181477.news.uni-berlin.de...
>
> I already have it. Do I Need to buy another copy for .NET, ie Textpad.NET?
>
> Can you tell it's Friday?
>
> Don Verhagen
Ray at Guest
-
frank #12
Re: [OT] Re: Another reason to NOT use .NET
"Ray at <%=sLocation%>" <ray@ajf8jalskdfna.sefrhja7yasdf.com> wrote in
message news:e99ACA$RDHA.2056@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...Textpad.NET?> "Don Verhagen" <news@southeast-florida.com> wrote in message
> news:ben7ti$75p8b$1@ID-181477.news.uni-berlin.de...
>> >
> > I already have it. Do I Need to buy another copy for .NET, ieIt does. I write ASP and ASP.NET applications with Textpad.> He he. Textpad rules.> >
> > Can you tell it's Friday?
> >
frank Guest
-
Don Verhagen #13
Re: [OT] Re: Another reason to NOT use .NET
In news:eIL41KaSDHA.1684@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl,
frank <frankie@frankie.com> typed:
: "Ray at <%=sLocation%>" <ray@ajf8jalskdfna.sefrhja7yasdf.com> wrote in
: message news:e99ACA$RDHA.2056@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
:: "Don Verhagen" <news@southeast-florida.com> wrote in message
:: news:ben7ti$75p8b$1@ID-181477.news.uni-berlin.de...
::
:::
::: I already have it. Do I Need to buy another copy for .NET, ie
::: Textpad.NET?
:::
::: Can you tell it's Friday?
:::
:: He he. Textpad rules.
:
: It does. I write ASP and ASP.NET applications with Textpad.
Thanks, but I guess I should have put [sacarasm] tags around my post.
Don Verhagen
Don Verhagen Guest
-
Andrew Durstewitz #14
Re: [OT] Re: Another reason to NOT use .NET
Eh, text pad is ok. I tend to use code editors with text highlighting.
Makes it easier to read.
-Andrew
* * * Sent via DevBuilder [url]http://www.devbuilder.org[/url] * * *
Developer Resources for High End Developers.
Andrew Durstewitz Guest



Reply With Quote

