OT - SQL Server 2005 Express

[Lionstone]

[url]http://searchsqlserver.techtarget.com/tip/1,289483,sid87_gci1082707,00.html[/url]

Seems it will be a large step above Access despite some similar limitations
(4GB max database size, for example), and probably quite good for most
data-driven websites. And free is a lot cheaper than a full version of SQL
Server.

[middletree]

Perhaps a better analogy would be to compare it to MSDE, not to Access. But
yes, it is going to better than Access.


"Lionstone" <HIDElionstoneHIDE@HIDEhush.com> wrote in message
news:d4lmfa$rrb$1@forums.macromedia.com...

>

[url]http://searchsqlserver.techtarget.com/tip/1,289483,sid87_gci1082707,00.html[/url]

>
> Seems it will be a large step above Access despite some similar

limitations

> (4GB max database size, for example), and probably quite good for most
> data-driven websites. And free is a lot cheaper than a full version of

SQL

> Server.
>
>

[Lionstone]

Good point. Even mentioned MSDE in the article. :)

"middletree" <middletree@verywarmmail.com> wrote in message
news:d4lub0$ah9$1@forums.macromedia.com...

> Perhaps a better analogy would be to compare it to MSDE, not to Access.
> But
> yes, it is going to better than Access.
>
>
> "Lionstone" <HIDElionstoneHIDE@HIDEhush.com> wrote in message
> news:d4lmfa$rrb$1@forums.macromedia.com...

>>

> [url]http://searchsqlserver.techtarget.com/tip/1,289483,sid87_gci1082707,00.html[/url]

>>
>> Seems it will be a large step above Access despite some similar

> limitations

>> (4GB max database size, for example), and probably quite good for most
>> data-driven websites. And free is a lot cheaper than a full version of

> SQL

>> Server.
>>
>>

>
>