Friday, November 7, 2003, 4:15:06 PM, you wrote:
> Hi Andi,
>> I've stated my opinion in the past (search the archives) and I don't think
>> it'd be feasible (nor critical) to implement this...
> Do you agree that if we don't have finally we should have a way to catch all exceptions ?
> Let me explain:
> If you have a library that can raise a huge number of different
> exceptions and you don't have finally, you should treat all exceptions at
> the same try/catch block, and rethrow the exceptions that should propagate.