Please don't yell at me.

Ask a Question related to Ubuntu, Design and Development.

  1. #1

    Default Please don't yell at me.


    Last week I installed Ubuntu 5.10 on the second hard drive of my spare
    PC. It installed perfectly and even set up dual booting; with WinXP on
    the primary. I've been playing around with it and have to say that
    Ubutnu is the slickest of all the Linux distros I've tried.

    But, I would like to un install it and return the second hard drive to
    Windows. Could anyone please tell me how to go about this?

    Your first question probably is, "Why would anyone want to go back to
    Windows?" Without going into a big song and dance the main reasons are
    that Open Office Ver 2 still doesn't measure up to MS Office for my
    purposes and The Gimp is no substitute for Paint Shop Pro.

    As an Oldie, my learning curve has pretty well flattened out and I
    need to stick to what's familiar. Can anyone please help?

    Harassed in Hastings


    Richard Birkbeck Guest

  2. #2

    Default Re: Please don't yell at me.

    2 things:

    1. Use your XP cd to boot into recovery mode and type : fixmbr
    This will remove the grub bootloader and allow u to boot into just XP.

    2. Once #1 is done, you need to reformat the 2nd drive into NTFS and
    make it useable by XP.

    "Richard Birkbeck" <finty01@btinternet.com> wrote in message
    news:f7ug72dp51l5jjl0ffvkr529iqbsmnlh0b@4ax.com...
    >
    > Last week I installed Ubuntu 5.10 on the second hard drive of my spare
    > PC. It installed perfectly and even set up dual booting; with WinXP on
    > the primary. I've been playing around with it and have to say that
    > Ubutnu is the slickest of all the Linux distros I've tried.
    >
    > But, I would like to un install it and return the second hard drive to
    > Windows. Could anyone please tell me how to go about this?
    >
    > Your first question probably is, "Why would anyone want to go back to
    > Windows?" Without going into a big song and dance the main reasons are
    > that Open Office Ver 2 still doesn't measure up to MS Office for my
    > purposes and The Gimp is no substitute for Paint Shop Pro.
    >
    > As an Oldie, my learning curve has pretty well flattened out and I
    > need to stick to what's familiar. Can anyone please help?
    >
    > Harassed in Hastings
    >
    >

    RaidenSix Guest

  3. #3

    Default Re: Please don't yell at me.

    Dear wannes and Raiden Six,

    Thank you very much for your instant help. I will get on it right
    away. And especially thank you for not yelling at me.

    Cheers,
    Rich
    Richard Birkbeck Guest

  4. #4

    Default Re: Please don't yell at me.

    "Richard Birkbeck" <finty01@btinternet.com> wrote in message
    news:f7ug72dp51l5jjl0ffvkr529iqbsmnlh0b@4ax.com...
    >
    > Your first question probably is, "Why would anyone want to go back to
    > Windows?" Without going into a big song and dance the main reasons are
    > that Open Office Ver 2 still doesn't measure up to MS Office for my
    > purposes

    just out of interest, can I ask what functions you have in MS Office that
    don't appear in OO 2.02 ? As an advanced Excel user I find that OO does
    EVERYTHING I ever did with Excel.


    Gordon Guest

  5. #5

    Default Re: Please don't yell at me.

    On Mon, 29 May 2006 07:44:05 +0100, Gordon mumbled:
    > "Richard Birkbeck" <finty01@btinternet.com> wrote in message
    > news:f7ug72dp51l5jjl0ffvkr529iqbsmnlh0b@4ax.com...
    >>
    >
    >> Your first question probably is, "Why would anyone want to go back to
    >> Windows?" Without going into a big song and dance the main reasons are
    >> that Open Office Ver 2 still doesn't measure up to MS Office for my
    >> purposes
    >
    >
    > just out of interest, can I ask what functions you have in MS Office that
    > don't appear in OO 2.02 ? As an advanced Excel user I find that OO does
    > EVERYTHING I ever did with Excel.
    >
    >
    There's lots of formatting gets lost, or altered. It may well be that OO is
    doing it correctly and we expect the broken version.

    OO2 is much closer and 99% of the time is fine, but it's not interchangeable
    for MS office... yet! ;-)
    --
    Simon.
    ================================================== ===================
    "Back up my hard disk ? I can't find the reverse switch !"
    ================================================== ===================
    Simon Jones Guest

  6. #6

    Default Re: Please don't yell at me.

    "Simon Jones" <tux@iinet.net.au> wrote in message
    news:447a9f26$0$7837$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
    >
    > There's lots of formatting gets lost, or altered.
    but that's an interoperability function, not an internal function of OO


    It may well be that OO is
    > doing it correctly and we expect the broken version.
    >
    > OO2 is much closer and 99% of the time is fine, but it's not
    > interchangeable
    > for MS office... yet! ;-)

    Not true. If you change a whole organisation to OO so that everyone is using
    it, then OO IS ready for the enterprise. As Isaid, as an Advanced Excel user
    (management accounting) I find that OO Calc does everything I used to do
    with Excel. OK, the macros don't convert well, but that's again that's an
    interoperability question, not a problem with the functionality of OO.

    > --
    > Simon.
    > ================================================== ===================
    > "Back up my hard disk ? I can't find the reverse switch !"
    > ================================================== ===================


    Gordon Guest

  7. #7

    Default Re: Please don't yell at me.

    On Mon, 29 May 2006 08:23:08 +0100, Gordon mumbled:
    > "Simon Jones" <tux@iinet.net.au> wrote in message
    > news:447a9f26$0$7837$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
    >>
    >> There's lots of formatting gets lost, or altered.
    >
    > but that's an interoperability function, not an internal function of OO
    >
    >
    > It may well be that OO is
    >> doing it correctly and we expect the broken version.
    >>
    >> OO2 is much closer and 99% of the time is fine, but it's not
    >> interchangeable
    >> for MS office... yet! ;-)
    >
    >
    > Not true. If you change a whole organisation to OO so that everyone is using
    > it, then OO IS ready for the enterprise. As Isaid, as an Advanced Excel user
    > (management accounting) I find that OO Calc does everything I used to do
    > with Excel. OK, the macros don't convert well, but that's again that's an
    > interoperability question, not a problem with the functionality of OO.
    That's fine if you never deal with external documents. Being a small
    business means about half are from external sources.

    --
    Simon.
    ================================================== ===================
    "Back up my hard disk ? I can't find the reverse switch !"
    ================================================== ===================
    Simon Jones Guest

  8. #8

    Default Re: Please don't yell at me.

    In article
    <447ada5a$0$7876$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au>,
    Simon Jones <tux@iinet.net.au> wrote:
    > On Mon, 29 May 2006 08:23:08 +0100, Gordon mumbled:
    > > "Simon Jones" <tux@iinet.net.au> wrote in message
    > > news:447a9f26$0$7837$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
    > >>
    > >> There's lots of formatting gets lost, or altered.
    > >
    > > but that's an interoperability function, not an internal function of OO
    > >
    > >
    > > It may well be that OO is
    > >> doing it correctly and we expect the broken version.
    > >>
    > >> OO2 is much closer and 99% of the time is fine, but it's not
    > >> interchangeable
    > >> for MS office... yet! ;-)
    > >
    > >
    > > Not true. If you change a whole organisation to OO so that everyone is
    > > using
    > > it, then OO IS ready for the enterprise. As Isaid, as an Advanced Excel
    > > user
    > > (management accounting) I find that OO Calc does everything I used to do
    > > with Excel. OK, the macros don't convert well, but that's again that's an
    > > interoperability question, not a problem with the functionality of OO.
    > That's fine if you never deal with external documents. Being a small
    > business means about half are from external sources.

    The trivial amount of lost formatting has not bothered me in the least.

    Al
    Al Guest

  9. #9

    Default Re: Please don't yell at me.

    On Mon, 29 May 2006 07:44:05 +0100, "Gordon"
    <gordon@lgbpcomputing.co.uk.invalid> wrote:
    >just out of interest, can I ask what functions you have in MS Office that
    >don't appear in OO 2.02 ? As an advanced Excel user I find that OO does
    >EVERYTHING I ever did with Excel.
    >
    Gordon,

    The main application in MS Office I use is Winword. I am converting
    some ancient files that I did back in an old DOS program called
    Secretary Bird. We are talking some ten years of research here which
    amounts to a lot of text. A lot of them are in all capital letters
    because in those days I was a lazy typist and it was easier to do it
    that way. So now, after converting the text to a more modern program,
    I'm having to convert them to properly constructed sentences. In the
    Change Case function, Winword has a Sentence Case choice which will
    capitalize the first letter after a period. I sat up a macro so I can
    convert whole paragraphs with a key press combination. This has saved
    me a lot of screwing around. So that is primarily the reason I didn't
    like using Open Office. On my computer Open Office seems to be quite a
    bit slower, too.

    My main reason for backing out of Linux, though, was that I just
    couldn't get it to recognize my bloody Winmodems. I downloaded
    instructions on how to go about setting that up, but, as I said
    before, my learning curve is pretty well flattened out and learning
    new things just doesn't bring as much joy as it used to.

    Thanks for your interest.

    Rich
    Richard Birkbeck Guest

  10. #10

    Default Re: Please don't yell at me.

    "Richard Birkbeck" <finty01@btinternet.com> wrote in message
    news:miul72dlcvjj5iqfhe0gfq7r8clmi0bd3h@4ax.com...
    >
    > My main reason for backing out of Linux, though, was that I just
    > couldn't get it to recognize my bloody Winmodems.
    Ah. the final killer. I sympathise with that! Can you not get broadband?


    Gordon Guest

  11. #11

    Default Re: Please don't yell at me.

    In article <4e0ep5F1c4fkaU1@individual.net>, Gordon says...
    > "Richard Birkbeck" <finty01@btinternet.com> wrote in message
    > news:miul72dlcvjj5iqfhe0gfq7r8clmi0bd3h@4ax.com...
    > >
    > > My main reason for backing out of Linux, though, was that I just
    > > couldn't get it to recognize my bloody Winmodems.
    >
    > Ah. the final killer. I sympathise with that! Can you not get broadband?
    >
    Or just buy a winmodem with a HCF or Lucent chipset.


    --
    Conor,
    Grumpy Old Man.
    Same shit, different day.
    Conor Guest

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139