Professional Web Applications Themes

Re : [PATCH TO TEST] VESA [1024x768] mode support for FreeBSD-CURRENT - FreeBSD

Hello, Thank you very much for replying.   I'm using the RELENG_5 sources from today. The syscons.diff.20050215 works but the vidcontrol.diff.20050215 gives some errors. |Index: vidcontrol.c |================================================= ================== |RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/usr.sbin/vidcontrol/vidcontrol.c,v |retrieving revision 1.48 |diff -u -r1.48 vidcontrol.c |--- vidcontrol.c 13 Jan 2005 03:59:44 -0000 1.48 |+++ vidcontrol.c 17 Jan 2005 05:27:25 -0000 -------------------------- Patching file vidcontrol.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 24. Hunk #2 succeeded at 48. Hunk #3 succeeded at 66 with fuzz 1. Hunk #4 failed at 187. Hunk #5 succeeded at 223. Hunk #6 failed at 239. Hunk #7 failed at 257. Hunk #8 ...

  1. #1

    Default Re : Re: [PATCH TO TEST] VESA [1024x768] mode support for FreeBSD-CURRENT

    Hello,
    Thank you very much for replying.
     

    I'm using the RELENG_5 sources from today.
    The syscons.diff.20050215 works but the vidcontrol.diff.20050215 gives some errors.

    |Index: vidcontrol.c

    |================================================= ==================

    |RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/usr.sbin/vidcontrol/vidcontrol.c,v

    |retrieving revision 1.48

    |diff -u -r1.48 vidcontrol.c

    |--- vidcontrol.c 13 Jan 2005 03:59:44 -0000 1.48

    |+++ vidcontrol.c 17 Jan 2005 05:27:25 -0000

    --------------------------

    Patching file vidcontrol.c using Plan A...

    Hunk #1 succeeded at 24.

    Hunk #2 succeeded at 48.

    Hunk #3 succeeded at 66 with fuzz 1.

    Hunk #4 failed at 187.

    Hunk #5 succeeded at 223.

    Hunk #6 failed at 239.

    Hunk #7 failed at 257.

    Hunk #8 failed at 297.

    Hunk #9 failed at 332.

    Hunk #10 succeeded at 348 with fuzz 2.

    Hunk #11 failed at 377.

    Hunk #12 failed at 419.

    Hunk #13 failed at 507.

    Hunk #14 failed at 572.

    Hunk #15 failed at 669.

    Hunk #16 failed at 722.

    Hunk #17 failed at 743.

    Hunk #18 failed at 806.

    Hunk #19 succeeded at 891.

    Hunk #20 failed at 900.

    Hunk #21 failed at 933.

    Hunk #22 succeeded at 950 with fuzz 2.

    Hunk #23 failed at 962.

    Hunk #24 failed at 985.

    Hunk #25 failed at 1035.

    Hunk #26 failed at 1050.

    Hunk #27 succeeded at 1148.

    Hunk #28 succeeded at 1173.

    Hunk #29 succeeded at 1217.

    Hunk #30 succeeded at 1234.

    19 out of 30 hunks failed--saving rejects to vidcontrol.c.rej

    done


    Didier Guest

  2. #2

    Default Re: Re : Re: [PATCH TO TEST] VESA [1024x768] mode support for FreeBSD-CURRENT

    Didier Wiroth wrote: 
    >
    > I'm using the RELENG_5 sources from today.[/ref]
     

    The diff is against the sources from -CURRENT where it applies and
    compiles cleanly. You should be ok using the current vidcontrol sources
    on -STABLE. The only difference is just some code purity fixes by Xin Li
    - probably in preparation for integrating the changes we speak about.

    Michal

    Michal Guest

  3. #3

    Default Re: Re : Re: [PATCH TO TEST] VESA [1024x768] mode support for FreeBSD-CURRENT

    Hi, Michal,

    在 2005-04-05二的 22:07 +0200,Michal Mertl写道: 
    > >
    > > I'm using the RELENG_5 sources from today.[/ref]
    >  
    >
    > The diff is against the sources from -CURRENT where it applies and
    > compiles cleanly. You should be ok using the current vidcontrol sources
    > on -STABLE. The only difference is just some code purity fixes by Xin Li
    > - probably in preparation for integrating the changes we speak about.[/ref]

    I went into some problem when using the patch on my own laptop, which
    indicates that USB based mouse can play something nasty with the
    patchset :-( It does not affect the functionality seriously, but is
    really annoying. I would appreciate if someone can fix the issue.

    Cheers,
    --
    Xin LI <delphij delphij net> http://www.delphij.net/

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD)

    iD8DBQBCVTpS/cVsHxFZiIoRAsJyAJ9tX7DWabRFOYFdZFX3SMDDdIroJwCcDY0 U
    jcaURBbg2hDioqJr1j04NvI=
    =+85u
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    Xin Guest

Similar Threads

  1. Support for FreeBSD?
    By little-devil in forum Macromedia Flash Flashcom
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: September 19th, 04:27 PM
  2. Replies: 10
    Last Post: April 11th, 07:50 AM
  3. Replies: 8
    Last Post: April 8th, 12:50 PM
  4. What is Freebsd 5.3 safe mode ?
    By John Palmer in forum FreeBSD
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: February 22nd, 10:55 AM
  5. Informix support on freeBSD for PHP
    By Geoff Geertsen in forum PHP Development
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: August 15th, 11:05 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139