Ask a Question related to Windows Server, Design and Development.
-
Bill #1
Re-routing print jobs
We have a print server here, with many jobs queued to a
non-existent printer. Is there any way to re-route those
print jobs to a different printer?
Thanks!
Bill Guest
-
Can't print some jobs at some times
I have problems to get some PDFs printed out of Acrobat 6. Those files DO always print well on another computer. Those files only sometimes print on... -
Centering print jobs
Dear all, I'm sure I could probably and will probably figure this out sometime: I need to know how to center something automatically on the... -
Slow spooling print jobs
I have one 2003 print server which only has IBM Network 17 printers on it. As far as I know this is the only site having a problem where the print... -
Collating print jobs in Acrobat 5.05
I have A.Reader v5.0 and printing on a Xerox Phaser 6200DP. As above, I too am having the same (disappointing) outcome attempting to do this. ... -
Fireworks MX and Print Jobs?
Hello: Fireworks is NOT the app of choice for hi resolution graphics. It was designed by MM as a web graphics app, and can choke quite handily on... -
Kevin Longley #2
Re: Re-routing print jobs
Yes - point it to a different port that is attached to a compatible printer.
"Bill" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:1746101c448e0$6d6200f0$a301280a@phx.gbl...> We have a print server here, with many jobs queued to a
> non-existent printer. Is there any way to re-route those
> print jobs to a different printer?
>
> Thanks!
Kevin Longley Guest
-
Re: Re-routing print jobs
yeah that and delete that friggin non existent printer-doh!
compatible printer.>-----Original Message-----
>Yes - point it to a different port that is attached to amessage>
>"Bill" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in>news:1746101c448e0$6d6200f0$a301280a@phx.gbl...>>> We have a print server here, with many jobs queued to a
>> non-existent printer. Is there any way to re-route those
>> print jobs to a different printer?
>>
>> Thanks!
>
>.
>Guest



Reply With Quote

