Professional Web Applications Themes

redhat 9.0 segmentatiion fault - Linux Setup, Configuration & Administration

After upgrading to RD 9.0 I could not run filepro database programs, I get "segmentation fault" with all executables. It ran find under 7.3 and 8.0 all versions but it won't run under 9.0. LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1 OR 2.2.5 has not helped. Any ideas, anyone? Alex...

  1. #1

    Default redhat 9.0 segmentatiion fault

    After upgrading to RD 9.0 I could not run filepro database programs, I get
    "segmentation fault" with all executables. It ran find under 7.3 and 8.0
    all versions but it won't run under 9.0. LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1 OR 2.2.5
    has not helped. Any ideas, anyone?


    Alex



    alex Guest

  2. #2

    Default Re: redhat 9.0 segmentatiion fault

    thanks, I'll attempt the crossposting.

    Alex
    "Vwakes" <vwakeNOSPAM100softhome.net> wrote in message
    news:Pine.CYG.4.55.0307232032450.3588ivirx...
    > On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 alex wrote:
    >
    > Pls Don't multipost and repost. Crosspost, like I am doing now. There
    > are several follow-ups to your post already that I am consolidating
    > here. Try them all out and tell us if it works or not. And set the
    > followup appropriately. You might want to read this
    >
    > [url]http://www.uwasa.fi/~ts/http/crospost.html[/url]
    >
    > >After upgrading to RD 9.0 I could not run filepro database programs, I
    > >get "segmentation fault" with all executables. It ran find under 7.3
    > >and 8.0 all versions but it won't run under 9.0.
    > >LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1 OR 2.2.5 has not helped. Any ideas, anyone?
    >
    > From: Ian Hilliard
    > Newsgroups: linux.redhat
    >
    > It's been a while, but last time I looked, filePro was designed for SCO
    > and required iBCS to run. I just checked my RH9 system, it doesn't seem
    > to be there, by default. Do you have iBCS running?
    >
    > Ian
    >
    > From: Vwakes
    > Newsgroups: alt.os.linux.redhat
    >
    > If you have the source files you can compile and see.
    >
    > You can 'strace' to see where it gets the signal and that might give
    > some clues.
    >
    > I saw this bugreport someone submitted sometime back without any
    > resolution, maybe you should add your comments too there.
    >
    > [url]http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90245[/url]
    >
    > GL
    > V.

    alex Guest

  3. #3

    Default Re: redhat 9.0 segmentatiion fault

    The version I have was compiled for Linux. Or so I understand, it is
    similar to the program run under sco but developed and compiled for linux as
    a port. I will however download iBCS and try it.

    Thanks
    Alex
    "Vwakes" <vwakeNOSPAM100softhome.net> wrote in message
    news:Pine.CYG.4.55.0307232032450.3588ivirx...
    > On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 alex wrote:
    >
    > Pls Don't multipost and repost. Crosspost, like I am doing now. There
    > are several follow-ups to your post already that I am consolidating
    > here. Try them all out and tell us if it works or not. And set the
    > followup appropriately. You might want to read this
    >
    > [url]http://www.uwasa.fi/~ts/http/crospost.html[/url]
    >
    > >After upgrading to RD 9.0 I could not run filepro database programs, I
    > >get "segmentation fault" with all executables. It ran find under 7.3
    > >and 8.0 all versions but it won't run under 9.0.
    > >LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1 OR 2.2.5 has not helped. Any ideas, anyone?
    >
    > From: Ian Hilliard
    > Newsgroups: linux.redhat
    >
    > It's been a while, but last time I looked, filePro was designed for SCO
    > and required iBCS to run. I just checked my RH9 system, it doesn't seem
    > to be there, by default. Do you have iBCS running?
    >
    > Ian
    >
    > From: Vwakes
    > Newsgroups: alt.os.linux.redhat
    >
    > If you have the source files you can compile and see.
    >
    > You can 'strace' to see where it gets the signal and that might give
    > some clues.
    >
    > I saw this bugreport someone submitted sometime back without any
    > resolution, maybe you should add your comments too there.
    >
    > [url]http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90245[/url]
    >
    > GL
    > V.

    alex Guest

  4. #4

    Default Re: redhat 9.0 segmentatiion fault

    On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 15:51:15 +0000, alex wrote:
    > thanks, I'll attempt the crossposting.
    Okay. While you're at it, please don't top-post. The recommended
    format for a followup is as follows.
    > First excerpt from quoted material
    > First excerpt from quoted material
    Reply to first excerpt
    Reply to first excerpt
    > Second excerpt from quoted material
    > Second excerpt from quoted material
    Reply to second excerpt
    Reply to second excerpt

    Ed Murphy Guest

Similar Threads

  1. redhat 5.3 :) ssh
    By murph in forum Linux / Unix Administration
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: January 16th, 08:18 AM
  2. RedHat 7.2 on 250 GB HD
    By Helge Preuss in forum Linux Setup, Configuration & Administration
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: August 23rd, 04:56 PM
  3. sco / redhat
    By lallous in forum SCO
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: August 14th, 06:34 PM
  4. static vs dynamic compiled versions of programs redhat 9.0 segmentation fault
    By alex in forum Linux Setup, Configuration & Administration
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: July 26th, 07:31 AM
  5. Using RPM with RedHat 9.0
    By Doru-Catalin Togea in forum Linux Setup, Configuration & Administration
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: July 7th, 11:49 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139