SCO file system mounting

Ask a Question related to FreeBSD, Design and Development.

  1. #1

    Default Re: SCO file system mounting

    In the last episode (Feb 23), Aftab Jahan Subedar said:
    > Would 'mount' mount the SCO file system ? Does any body know ? I
    > presume the SCO system as partition type 2 or partition type 3 or
    > partition type 0x63.
    Sorry; no-one has written drivers for any of SCO's filesystem types
    (htfs is probably what you have).

    --
    Dan Nelson
    [email]dnelson@allantgroup.com[/email]
    Dan Nelson Guest

  2. Similar Questions and Discussions

    1. Writing a text file to the file system
      Using Visual Studio C# When I ran the following code: System.IO; private void Button1_Click(object sender, System.EventArgs e) {...
    2. How to delete a file from the file system
      Hi, Is there any module which has methods that can be used to delete a file from the filesystem in the windows NT environment. Thanks in...
    3. mounting cdrom and dvd
      I have a dvd-rom and read write CD in my Red Hat 8 box. When mounting mount /dev/cdrom /mnt/cdrom only the dvd-rom is mounted. How can I...
    4. System.IO.IOException: Cannot create a file when that file already exists.
      Getting the following error on my production server whether the file exists or not: "System.IO.IOException: Cannot create a file when that file...
    5. mounting cdrom
      ok, i have determined how to mount my win32 patitions as well as mounting the cdrom. how do i mount a regular audio disc on my cdrom? thanks long...
  3. #2

    Default Re: SCO file system mounting

    In the last episode (Feb 23), Aftab Jahan Subedar said:
    > Dan Nelson wrote:
    > >In the last episode (Feb 23), Aftab Jahan Subedar said:
    > >>Would 'mount' mount the SCO file system ? Does any body know ? I
    > >>presume the SCO system as partition type 2 or partition type 3 or
    > >>partition type 0x63.
    > >
    > >Sorry; no-one has written drivers for any of SCO's filesystem types
    > >(htfs is probably what you have).
    >
    > Legal issue? If not I will try one.
    More likely that either a) the format isn't documented anywhere, or b)
    there hasn't really been anyone asking for one :)

    --
    Dan Nelson
    [email]dnelson@allantgroup.com[/email]
    Dan Nelson Guest

  4. #3

    Default RE: SCO file system mounting

    -----Original Message-----
    > From: Aftab Jahan Subedar [mailto:jahan@bol-online.com]
    > Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 2:45 AM
    > To: [email]questions@freebsd.org[/email]
    > Subject: SCO file system mounting
    >
    >
    > Hello to all.
    >
    > Would 'mount' mount the SCO file system ? Does any body know
    > ? I presume the SCO system as partition type 2 or partition type 3 or
    > partition type 0x63.
    If SCO is running...
    How about mount -t nfs?

    I used to do this all the time six/seven
    years ago with 3.2-RELEASE, I think
    that's what it was.

    dave

    Hauan David A Guest

  5. #4

    Default SCO file system mounting

    Hello to all.

    Would 'mount' mount the SCO file system ? Does any body know ?
    I presume the SCO system as partition type 2 or partition type 3 or
    partition type 0x63.

    Thank you.
    -Jahan
    Aftab Jahan Subedar Guest

  6. #5

    Default Re: SCO file system mounting

    Dan Nelson wrote:
    >In the last episode (Feb 23), Aftab Jahan Subedar said:
    >
    >
    >>Would 'mount' mount the SCO file system ? Does any body know ? I
    >>presume the SCO system as partition type 2 or partition type 3 or
    >>partition type 0x63.
    >>
    >>
    >
    >Sorry; no-one has written drivers for any of SCO's filesystem types
    >(htfs is probably what you have).
    >
    >
    >
    Legal issue? If not I will try one.
    Aftab Jahan Subedar Guest

  7. #6

    Default Re: SCO file system mounting

    Dan Nelson wrote:
    >In the last episode (Feb 23), Aftab Jahan Subedar said:
    >
    >
    >>Dan Nelson wrote:
    >>
    >>
    >>>In the last episode (Feb 23), Aftab Jahan Subedar said:
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>>Would 'mount' mount the SCO file system ? Does any body know ? I
    >>>>presume the SCO system as partition type 2 or partition type 3 or
    >>>>partition type 0x63.
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>Sorry; no-one has written drivers for any of SCO's filesystem types
    >>>(htfs is probably what you have).
    >>>
    >>>
    >>Legal issue? If not I will try one.
    >>
    >>
    >
    >More likely that either a) the format isn't documented anywhere, or b)
    >there hasn't really been anyone asking for one :)
    >
    >
    >
    gotcha.
    I will try diggin.
    Thanks.

    Aftab Jahan Subedar
    [url]http://www.tucows.com/preview/379868.html[/url] - Kayoty ,my Spyware detector

    Aftab Jahan Subedar Guest

  8. #7

    Default Re: SCO file system mounting

    Hauan David A wrote:
    > -----Original Message-----
    >
    >
    >>From: Aftab Jahan Subedar [mailto:jahan@bol-online.com]
    >>Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 2:45 AM
    >>To: [email]questions@freebsd.org[/email]
    >>Subject: SCO file system mounting
    >>
    >>
    >>Hello to all.
    >>
    >>Would 'mount' mount the SCO file system ? Does any body know
    >>? I presume the SCO system as partition type 2 or partition type 3 or
    >>partition type 0x63.
    >>
    >>
    >
    >If SCO is running...
    >How about mount -t nfs?
    >
    >I used to do this all the time six/seven
    >years ago with 3.2-RELEASE, I think
    >that's what it was.
    >
    >dave
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    Good idea .
    but the bad thing is its only running the serial terminals.
    no nic !!!!!

    Thanks Dave.
    Thanks.

    Aftab Jahan Subedar
    [url]http://www.tucows.com/preview/379868.html[/url] - Kayoty ,my Spyware detector
    Aftab Jahan Subedar Guest

  9. #8

    Default Re: SCO file system mounting

    On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 01:13:06AM -0600, Aftab Jahan Subedar typed:
    > Hauan David A wrote:
    >
    > >-----Original Message-----
    > >
    > >>From: Aftab Jahan Subedar [mailto:jahan@bol-online.com]
    > >>Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 2:45 AM
    > >>To: [email]questions@freebsd.org[/email]
    > >>Subject: SCO file system mounting
    > >>
    > >>Hello to all.
    > >>
    > >>Would 'mount' mount the SCO file system ? Does any body know
    > >>? I presume the SCO system as partition type 2 or partition type 3 or
    > >>partition type 0x63.
    > >
    > >If SCO is running...
    > >How about mount -t nfs?
    > >
    > >I used to do this all the time six/seven
    > >years ago with 3.2-RELEASE, I think
    > >that's what it was.
    > >
    > >dave
    >
    > Good idea .
    > but the bad thing is its only running the serial terminals.
    > no nic !!!!!
    No problem. Use SLIP or PPP.

    Ruben
    Ruben de Groot Guest

  10. #9

    Default Re: SCO file system mounting

    [email]freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org[/email] skrev:
    >>>>Hello to all.
    >>>>
    >>>>Would 'mount' mount the SCO file system ? Does any body know
    >>>>? I presume the SCO system as partition type 2 or partition type 3 or
    >>>>partition type 0x63.
    >>>
    >>>If SCO is running...
    >>>How about mount -t nfs?
    >>>
    >>Good idea .
    >>but the bad thing is its only running the serial terminals.
    >>no nic !!!!!
    >
    > No problem. Use SLIP or PPP.
    As far as I remember some SCO versions have no networking support at all
    - you had to pay extra for that.

    Best regards,

    Mikkel C. Simonsen


    Mikkel C. Simonsen Guest

  11. #10

    Default Re: SCO file system mounting

    David Bear wrote:
    >On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 01:13:06AM -0600, Aftab Jahan Subedar wrote:
    >
    >
    >>Hauan David A wrote:
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>>-----Original Message-----
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>>From: Aftab Jahan Subedar [mailto:jahan@bol-online.com]
    >>>>Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 2:45 AM
    >>>>To: [email]questions@freebsd.org[/email]
    >>>>Subject: SCO file system mounting
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>Hello to all.
    >>>>
    >>>>Would 'mount' mount the SCO file system ? Does any body know
    >>>>? I presume the SCO system as partition type 2 or partition type 3 or
    >>>>partition type 0x63.
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>If SCO is running...
    >>>How about mount -t nfs?
    >>>
    >>>I used to do this all the time six/seven
    >>>years ago with 3.2-RELEASE, I think
    >>>that's what it was.
    >>>
    >>>dave
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>Good idea .
    >>but the bad thing is its only running the serial terminals.
    >>no nic !!!!!
    >>
    >>
    >
    >well, there's ckermit.. it works fine over serial lines since thats
    >when it was designed. kermit file transfer may be what you want.
    >
    >
    >
    >>Thanks Dave.
    >>Thanks.
    >>
    >>Aftab Jahan Subedar
    >>[url]http://www.tucows.com/preview/379868.html[/url] - Kayoty ,my Spyware detector
    >>______________________________________________ _
    >>freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
    >>[url]http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions[/url]
    >>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
    >>
    >>
    >
    >
    >
    Thank you very much.
    I will do that.
    Aftab Jahan Subedar Guest

  12. #11

    Default Re: SCO file system mounting

    Ruben de Groot wrote:
    >On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 01:13:06AM -0600, Aftab Jahan Subedar typed:
    >
    >
    >>Hauan David A wrote:
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>>-----Original Message-----
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>>From: Aftab Jahan Subedar [mailto:jahan@bol-online.com]
    >>>>Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 2:45 AM
    >>>>To: [email]questions@freebsd.org[/email]
    >>>>Subject: SCO file system mounting
    >>>>
    >>>>Hello to all.
    >>>>
    >>>>Would 'mount' mount the SCO file system ? Does any body know
    >>>>? I presume the SCO system as partition type 2 or partition type 3 or
    >>>>partition type 0x63.
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>If SCO is running...
    >>>How about mount -t nfs?
    >>>
    >>>I used to do this all the time six/seven
    >>>years ago with 3.2-RELEASE, I think
    >>>that's what it was.
    >>>
    >>>dave
    >>>
    >>>
    >>Good idea .
    >>but the bad thing is its only running the serial terminals.
    >>no nic !!!!!
    >>
    >>
    >
    >No problem. Use SLIP or PPP.
    >
    >Ruben
    >
    >
    >
    >
    Thanks I will try that too. along with ckermit.
    Aftab Jahan Subedar Guest

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139