In article <bfj4hf$b3r$1$8300dec7news.demon.co.uk>, kevin bailey
>SCO's lawyers have dismayed most unix developers/sysadmins
>SCOworldwide and will now go under but what i want to know is...
>is it just a complete up by SCO in allowing their lawyers to
>try to make money from nothing instead of creating good product?
>is the hand of MS behind this somehow - certainly smacks of FUD
The interview that Darl has on Zdnet explains the SCO side fairly
well - even though some of Farber's question seem to be slighty
And I remember email exchanges from a couple of ...