Sort Array Question...

Maybe you could have a second array, initially unpopulated, whose upper
bound increments as you add elements to it. Then you don't have an array
peppered with meaningless elements consisting of empty strings.

And please learn how to reply to the correct post using devbuilder, or use a
real newsreader that knows how to thread a conversation correctly.




"Andrew Durstewitz" <adurstew@devbuilder.org> wrote in message
news:3f15a308$0$205$75868355@news.frii.net...

> To return with an array that doesn't have empty items in it. After the
> array is populated I reference 2 previously created arrays to insure
> proper information. If items aren't needed they are removed (arrItem =
> "") from the array.
>
> However, I think this is causing some system degridation when still
> having to loop through the empty items later...
>
> -Andrew
>
> * * * Sent via DevBuilder http://www.devbuilder.org * * *
> Developer Resources for High End Developers.

>Maybe you could have a second array, initially >unpopulated, whose
upper

>bound increments as you add elements to it. Then >you don't have an

array

>peppered with meaningless elements consisting of >empty strings.

>And please learn how to reply to the correct post >using devbuilder, or

use a

>real newsreader that knows how to thread a >conversation correctly.

I have sent a message to the people who provide my connection to USENET
(I own DevBuilder.org) to add this feature. Sorry for the confusion on
posts.

-Andrew

* * * Sent via DevBuilder http://www.devbuilder.org * * *
Developer Resources for High End Developers.