Ask a Question related to Ruby, Design and Development.
-
David A. Black #1
Re: "stereotyping" (was: Re: Strong Typing (Re: Managing metadataabout attribute types) )
Hi --
On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
I'm not trying to persuade you not to do it -- just pointing out that> Interesting logic. But it's not good enough to persuade Sean (and me).
the fact that some people claim to need it does not mean discussion
and evaluation should end. (Not that this discussion is in danger of
ending too early :-) But actually it may get more interesting as we
move away from kind_of? and friends.)
David
--
David A. Black
[email]dblack@wobblini.net[/email]
David A. Black Guest
-
"stereotyping" (was: Strong Typing (Managing metadataabout attribute types) )
> In sean's case, class and/or module were sufficient to define To be fair, he goes beyond class/module model. The reason we tend to object to... -
"stereotyping" (was: Strong Typing (Managing metadataabout attribute types)
Simon, there is another way, the classes can be substantiated only on the remote end and all messages are routed to the remote object. the local... -
"stereotyping" (was: Strong Typing (Managing metadataabout attribute types)
Simon, yes, i understood that the first time. (sorry, i just spent a couple of hours reading through hugely verbose posts that tended toward... -
"stereotyping" (was: Strong Typing (Managing metadataabout attribute types)
On Thu, 2003-11-20 at 11:33, Weirich, James wrote: Well, you certainly captured my thoughts. That's exactly what I was suggesting with the... -
"stereotyping" (was: Strong Typing (Managing metadataabout attribute types)
Sean O'Dell writes: know it they Charles Hixson writes: Several people have said this, and although true, this is not my main concern...
Reply With QuoteSimilar Questions and Discussions
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
