Sun 280R Server Performance Problem

Ask a Question related to Sun Solaris, Design and Development.

  1. #1

    Default Sun 280R Server Performance Problem


    We ran simulate on SunFire 280R server with SCSI 10000rpm harddisk,
    however the performance is even slower than an IBM notebook?

    After some benchmark testing, I found that is a problem of the hard disk
    performance. The section below is the result of bonnie++ test

    Version 1.03 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
    Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP
    WL280-2 2G 13138 62 32880 15 12175 11 19697 99 64476 25 294.5 1
    ------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create--------
    -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete--
    files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP
    16 101 0 +++++ +++ 166 0 101 0 +++++ +++ 212 1

    You may notice that the file creation is just 101/second, which compares
    to the standard linux machine with 980/second.

    Is there any way to tune this performance?

    Regards,
    Germen

    --
    Posted via [url]http://dbforums.com[/url]
    germen Guest

  2. Similar Questions and Discussions

    1. CFFORM Server Performance
      Hi Friends I have a serious issue with my cfforms, I've designed a very , very nice form using cfform and cfgride and I link them together so I...
    2. Help with MX7 server settings/performance
      We put a very simple new application out the other day and it completely took down the server. Our CPU was 0% idled for a few seconds remaining...
    3. Cyclic Restart on SunFire 280R
      Hi all! I'm quite a newbie in administration tasks, so maybe this is a trivial question ;-) The fact is that I boot from cdrom to install an...
    4. SQL Server Performance & ASP
      Hi Everyone, I'm working on a web project that will potentially have many thousands of users hit IIS during the course of any given day. So, with...
    5. Performance tunning in SQL Server 7.0
      Hello, In SQL Server 7.0, we are having a stored procedure to select the records and insert into another temporary table. In SQL server, there...
  3. #2

    Default Re: Sun 280R Server Performance Problem

    germen wrote:
    > We ran simulate on SunFire 280R server with SCSI 10000rpm harddisk,
    > however the performance is even slower than an IBM notebook?
    <snip>
    > You may notice that the file creation is just 101/second, which compares
    > to the standard linux machine with 980/second.
    >
    > Is there any way to tune this performance?
    There is (tunefs command), but you should check you're running the
    latest patches in case its a software issue, like:
    [url]http://sunsolve.sun.com/pub-cgi/findPatch.pl?patchId=113454&rev=04[/url]

    Also try experimenting with mounting the disk with the logging option.

    Rgs,
    Kot


    MrKotter Guest

  4. #3

    Default Re: Sun 280R Server Performance Problem


    Thank you for your helps!

    After I have enabled the logging the performance came back.

    Version 1.03 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential
    Input- --Random-
    -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr-
    --Block-- --Seeks--
    Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec
    %CP /sec %CP
    2G 12104 57 24599 12 11358 11 19732 99 65624
    25 286.7 2
    ------Sequential Create------ --------Random
    Create--------
    -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create--
    --Read--- -Delete--
    files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec
    %CP /sec %CP
    16 2786 16 +++++ +++ 4110 20 4004 21 +++++
    +++ 347 1


    2786 files per second right now!!!


    Many Thanks!
    Germen

    --
    Posted via [url]http://dbforums.com[/url]
    germen Guest

  5. #4

    Default Re: Sun 280R Server Performance Problem

    germen wrote:
    > We ran simulate on SunFire 280R server with SCSI 10000rpm harddisk,
    > however the performance is even slower than an IBM notebook?
    >
    > After some benchmark testing, I found that is a problem of the hard disk
    > performance. The section below is the result of bonnie++ test
    >
    > Version 1.03 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
    > Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP
    > WL280-2 2G 13138 62 32880 15 12175 11 19697 99 64476 25 294.5 1
    > ------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create--------
    > -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete--
    > files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP
    > 16 101 0 +++++ +++ 166 0 101 0 +++++ +++ 212 1
    >
    > You may notice that the file creation is just 101/second, which compares
    > to the standard linux machine with 980/second.
    >
    > Is there any way to tune this performance?
    >
    > Regards,
    > Germen
    >
    > --
    > Posted via [url]http://dbforums.com[/url]

    If you are doing a lot of file-I/O and is not interested
    in the access times on the file-inodes, you can turn off
    access time stamping.

    This is done with the flag "noatime".

    so in addition to using the "logging" mount option use
    "noatime" as well.

    Also be aware that UFS performance increses alot if you
    run Solaris 9 12/02 or later.

    Regards
    //Lars


    --
    ================================================== ======
    Lars Tunkrans
    smtp: lars dot tunkrans at bredband dot net
    --------------------------------------------------------

    Lars Tunkrans Guest

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139