Ask a Question related to Sun Solaris, Design and Development.
-
germen #1
Sun 280R Server Performance Problem
We ran simulate on SunFire 280R server with SCSI 10000rpm harddisk,
however the performance is even slower than an IBM notebook?
After some benchmark testing, I found that is a problem of the hard disk
performance. The section below is the result of bonnie++ test
Version 1.03 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP
WL280-2 2G 13138 62 32880 15 12175 11 19697 99 64476 25 294.5 1
------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create--------
-Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete--
files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP
16 101 0 +++++ +++ 166 0 101 0 +++++ +++ 212 1
You may notice that the file creation is just 101/second, which compares
to the standard linux machine with 980/second.
Is there any way to tune this performance?
Regards,
Germen
--
Posted via [url]http://dbforums.com[/url]
germen Guest
-
CFFORM Server Performance
Hi Friends I have a serious issue with my cfforms, I've designed a very , very nice form using cfform and cfgride and I link them together so I... -
Help with MX7 server settings/performance
We put a very simple new application out the other day and it completely took down the server. Our CPU was 0% idled for a few seconds remaining... -
Cyclic Restart on SunFire 280R
Hi all! I'm quite a newbie in administration tasks, so maybe this is a trivial question ;-) The fact is that I boot from cdrom to install an... -
SQL Server Performance & ASP
Hi Everyone, I'm working on a web project that will potentially have many thousands of users hit IIS during the course of any given day. So, with... -
Performance tunning in SQL Server 7.0
Hello, In SQL Server 7.0, we are having a stored procedure to select the records and insert into another temporary table. In SQL server, there... -
MrKotter #2
Re: Sun 280R Server Performance Problem
germen wrote:
<snip>> We ran simulate on SunFire 280R server with SCSI 10000rpm harddisk,
> however the performance is even slower than an IBM notebook?There is (tunefs command), but you should check you're running the> You may notice that the file creation is just 101/second, which compares
> to the standard linux machine with 980/second.
>
> Is there any way to tune this performance?
latest patches in case its a software issue, like:
[url]http://sunsolve.sun.com/pub-cgi/findPatch.pl?patchId=113454&rev=04[/url]
Also try experimenting with mounting the disk with the logging option.
Rgs,
Kot
MrKotter Guest
-
germen #3
Re: Sun 280R Server Performance Problem
Thank you for your helps!
After I have enabled the logging the performance came back.
Version 1.03 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential
Input- --Random-
-Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr-
--Block-- --Seeks--
Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec
%CP /sec %CP
2G 12104 57 24599 12 11358 11 19732 99 65624
25 286.7 2
------Sequential Create------ --------Random
Create--------
-Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create--
--Read--- -Delete--
files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec
%CP /sec %CP
16 2786 16 +++++ +++ 4110 20 4004 21 +++++
+++ 347 1
2786 files per second right now!!!
Many Thanks!
Germen
--
Posted via [url]http://dbforums.com[/url]
germen Guest
-
Lars Tunkrans #4
Re: Sun 280R Server Performance Problem
germen wrote:
> We ran simulate on SunFire 280R server with SCSI 10000rpm harddisk,
> however the performance is even slower than an IBM notebook?
>
> After some benchmark testing, I found that is a problem of the hard disk
> performance. The section below is the result of bonnie++ test
>
> Version 1.03 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
> Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP
> WL280-2 2G 13138 62 32880 15 12175 11 19697 99 64476 25 294.5 1
> ------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create--------
> -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete--
> files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP
> 16 101 0 +++++ +++ 166 0 101 0 +++++ +++ 212 1
>
> You may notice that the file creation is just 101/second, which compares
> to the standard linux machine with 980/second.
>
> Is there any way to tune this performance?
>
> Regards,
> Germen
>
> --
> Posted via [url]http://dbforums.com[/url]
If you are doing a lot of file-I/O and is not interested
in the access times on the file-inodes, you can turn off
access time stamping.
This is done with the flag "noatime".
so in addition to using the "logging" mount option use
"noatime" as well.
Also be aware that UFS performance increses alot if you
run Solaris 9 12/02 or later.
Regards
//Lars
--
================================================== ======
Lars Tunkrans
smtp: lars dot tunkrans at bredband dot net
--------------------------------------------------------
Lars Tunkrans Guest



Reply With Quote

